Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded Objects

Image regions corresponding to partially hidden objects are enclosed by two types of bounding contour: those inherent to the object itself (intrinsic) and those defined by occlusion (extrinsic). Intrinsic contours provide useful information regarding object shape, whereas extrinsic contours vary arbitrarily depending on accidental spatial relationships in scenes. Because extrinsic contours can only degrade the process of surface description and object recognition, it is argued that they must be removed prior to a stage of template matching. This implies that the two types of contour must be distinguished relatively early in visual processing and we hypothesize that the encoding of depth is critical for this task. The common border is attached to and regarded as intrinsic to the closer region, and detached from and regarded as extrinsic to the farther region. We also suggest that intrinsic borders aid in the segmentation of image regions and thus prevent grouping, whereas extrinsic borders provide a linkage to other extrinsic borders and facilitate grouping. Support for these views is found in a series of demonstrations, and also in an experiment where the expected superiority of recognition was found when partially sampled faces were seen in a back rather than a front stereoscopic depth plane.

[1]  C. Gilbert Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  S Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Hans Wallach Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung , 1935 .

[4]  Na Na,et al.  Evolution of Binocular Vision , 1925 .

[5]  R. Lawson,et al.  Stereoscopic enhancement and erasure of subjective contours. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  G F Poggio,et al.  Depth sensitivity of binocular cortical neurons of behaving monkeys , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  R. L. Gregory,et al.  Illusory contours and stereo depth , 1974 .

[8]  John P. McDermott,et al.  Rule-Based Interpretation of Aerial Imagery , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Adolfo Guzmán-Arenas,et al.  Decomposition of a visual scene into three-dimensional bodies , 1968, AFIPS Fall Joint Computing Conference.

[10]  D. Ts'o,et al.  The organization of chromatic and spatial interactions in the primate striate cortex , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[12]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Vision: The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception , 1990 .

[13]  R Fox,et al.  Effect of depth separation on metacontrast masking. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  An Approach to Object Recognition: Aligning Pictorial Descriptions , 1986 .

[15]  C. Schor,et al.  Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis , 1984, Vision Research.

[16]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[17]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[18]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  R Fox,et al.  Depth separation and lateral interference , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Harry G. Barrow,et al.  Experiments in Interpretation-Guided Segmentation , 1977, Artificial Intelligence.

[21]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[22]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..