Anodal tDCS and High-Frequency tRNS Targeting the Occipitotemporal Cortex Do Not Always Enhance Face Perception
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Lövdén,et al. Direct-Current Stimulation Does Little to Improve the Outcome of Working Memory Training in Older Adults , 2017, Psychological science.
[2] C. Miniussi,et al. On the Functional Equivalence of Electrodes in Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation , 2016, Brain Stimulation.
[3] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[4] Kathleen Veizel,et al. Wechsler Memory Scale–Fourth Edition , 2014 .
[5] B. Duchaine,et al. High-Frequency Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Enhances Perception of Facial Identity , 2015, Cerebral cortex.
[6] M. Nitsche,et al. Anodal-tDCS over the human right occipital cortex enhances the perception and memory of both faces and objects , 2016, Neuropsychologia.
[7] Linda Jeffery,et al. How distinct is the coding of face identity and expression? Evidence for some common dimensions in face space , 2015, Cognition.
[8] A. Brunoni,et al. The effect of the interval-between-sessions on prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, Journal of Neural Transmission.
[9] M. Nitsche,et al. Effects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Cognition , 2012, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.
[10] A. Antal,et al. Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High-Frequency Random Noise Stimulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[11] David I. Perrett,et al. Facial expressions of emotion: Stimuli and tests (FEEST) , 2002 .
[12] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[13] A. Young,et al. Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[14] Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al. Not all brains are created equal: the relevance of individual differences in responsiveness to transcranial electrical stimulation , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..
[15] K. Nakayama,et al. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[16] Paul B. Fitzgerald,et al. Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Findings From Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Populations , 2016, Brain Stimulation.
[17] M. Nitsche,et al. Preliminary Evidence of “Other-Race Effect”-Like Behavior Induced by Cathodal-tDCS over the Right Occipital Cortex, in the Absence of Overall Effects on Face/Object Processing , 2017, Front. Neurosci..
[18] B. Gordon,et al. Reproducibility of tDCS Results in a Randomized Trial: Failure to Replicate Findings of tDCS-Induced Enhancement of Verbal Fluency , 2016, Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology.
[19] G. Yovel,et al. Diagnosing prosopagnosia: Effects of ageing, sex, and participant–stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Cambridge Face Perception Test , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[20] M. Coltheart,et al. Covert face recognition in congenital prosopagnosia: A group study , 2012, Cortex.
[21] A. Vercammen,et al. Anodal tDCS targeting the right orbitofrontal cortex enhances facial expression recognition. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[22] M. Behrmann,et al. Congenital prosopagnosia: face-blind from birth , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[23] Ludovica Labruna,et al. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Influence the Speed–Accuracy Tradeoff in Perceptual Decision-making: Evidence from Three Independent Studies , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[24] Sherryse L. Corrow,et al. Prosopagnosia: current perspectives , 2016, Eye and brain.
[25] M. Falkmer,et al. Face Recognition and Visual Search Strategies in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Amending and Extending a Recent Review by Weigelt et al. , 2015, PloS one.
[26] Tad T. Brunyé,et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation targeting the right fusiform gyrus selectively increases working memory for faces , 2017, Brain and Cognition.
[27] C. Miniussi,et al. Transcranial Electrical Stimulation , 2016, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.
[28] M. Koslowsky,et al. tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.
[29] Jared Medina,et al. No evidential value in samples of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies of cognition and working memory in healthy populations , 2017, Cortex.
[30] Michael Schneider,et al. Electrical brain stimulation (tES) improves learning more than performance: A meta-analysis , 2018, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[31] L. Schmalzl,et al. What is Overt and what is Covert in Congenital Prosopagnosia? , 2013, Neuropsychology Review.
[32] Jessica L. Irons,et al. New Tests to Measure Individual Differences in Matching and Labelling Facial Expressions of Emotion, and Their Association with Ability to Recognise Vocal Emotions and Facial Identity , 2013, PloS one.
[33] Richard N. A. Henson,et al. Perception and Conception: Temporal Lobe Activity during Complex Discriminations of Familiar and Novel Faces and Objects , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[34] Andrew W. Young,et al. Quaglino's 1867 Case of Prosopagnosia , 2003, Cortex.
[35] Ken Nakayama,et al. Psychosocial consequences of developmental prosopagnosia: a problem of recognition. , 2008, Journal of psychosomatic research.
[36] Michael F. Green,et al. Social cognition in schizophrenia , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[37] Jordan Grafman,et al. Bilateral frontal transcranial direct current stimulation: Failure to replicate classic findings in healthy subjects , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[38] Elinor McKone,et al. Impaired holistic coding of facial expression and facial identity in congenital prosopagnosia , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[39] J. Barton. Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.
[40] M. Nitsche,et al. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.
[41] Lucia M. Li,et al. The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies , 2015, Front. Cell. Neurosci..
[42] L. Cohen,et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.