Uncertainty, Secrecy, and the Choice of Similar Others

The effects of uncertainty ofcriteria and secrecy in decision making on the tendency of subjects to choosejob applicants similar to themselves were examined. Uncertainty was operationalized as a choice among candidates approximately equally qualified as defined by a set of candidate attributes. Secrecy referred to two conditions: (1) whether or not the decision-maker's name was to be publicly identified with the recommendation; and (2) whether or not the information used by the subject to form his recommendation was to be released to others. Uncertainty tended to increase the use of social similarity as a criterion for choice, while the release of information relevant to the choice tended to decrease the subjects' choice of others similar to themselves in both uncertain and certain conditions. Identifying the subject with his choice tended to increase the use of social similarity when information was not released, but tended to decrease it when information was released. This interaction effect was less clear in reliability and interpretation.

[1]  John K. Maniha Universalism and Particularism in Bureaucratizing Organizations. , 1975 .

[2]  Glen D. Baskett,et al.  Interview decisions as determined by competency and attitude similarity. , 1973 .

[3]  Lowell L. Hargens,et al.  Patterns of Mobility of New Ph.D.'s among American Academic Institutions. , 1969 .

[4]  D. Byrne Attitudes and Attraction , 1969 .

[5]  W. Clay Hamner,et al.  Race and sex as determinants of ratings by potential employers in a simulated work-sampling task. , 1974 .

[6]  J. Hackman,et al.  Effects of interviewer-interviewee similarity on interviewer objectivity in college admissions interviews , 1975 .

[7]  C. Golightly,et al.  Liking and loaning. , 1972 .

[8]  W. Yoels The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Allocation of Editorships on Scientific Journals: Some Observations on the Politics of Knowledge* , 1974 .

[9]  D. Byrne,et al.  Effects of consensual validation and invalidation on attraction as a function of verifiability , 1966 .

[10]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[11]  Janice Beyer Lodahl,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments. , 1972 .

[12]  C. Perrow Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[13]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Race versus belief similarity as determinants of attraction: a search for a fair test. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  The semantics of asking a favor: How to succeed in getting help without really dying. , 1972 .

[15]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[16]  Stanley H. Udy,et al.  'Bureaucracy' and 'rationality' in Weber's organization theory , 1959 .