Clinical use of indices determined non-invasively from the radial and carotid pressure waveforms

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical use of radial and carotid artery applanation tonometry as an independent supplement to cuff sphygmomanometry. MethodsIn 44 patients, radial and carotid tonometric pressure recordings were taken at short intervals apart by two persons who had prolonged experience with both. Comparisons were made between directly recorded radial and carotid waveforms and between aortic waves synthesized from both, using SphygmoCor. Focus was on waveform features: time intervals between wavefoot and incisura, denoting ejection duration, between wavefoot and first systolic peak or shoulder (T1), and augmentation index – the rise in pressure from this point to systolic peak divided by pulse pressure. ResultsNo patient had discomfort with radial tonometry, whereas many found carotid tonometry uncomfortable. Beat-to-beat variability was lower for the radial than carotid site. The device's operator ‘quality index’ was achieved for 78% of radial waveforms but just 20% of carotid waveforms (P<0.05). Interobserver variability was lower for all indices derived from radial, cf. carotid, waveforms. For the two observers combined, there was no difference between aortic indices determined from carotid and radial sites except for T1 (radial-derived 117±17 ms, cf. carotid-derived 103±17 ms, P<0.05), but this did not influence the value of augmentation index (radial-derived 26±13%, cf. carotid-derived 28±14%, P=NS). ConclusionThe present study conforms with most published results, and indicates superiority of radial to carotid tonometry in clinical practice.

[1]  C H Chen,et al.  Validation of carotid artery tonometry as a means of estimating augmentation index of ascending aortic pressure. , 1996, Hypertension.

[2]  D. Webb,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness and risk of atherosclerotic events. , 2003, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[3]  R. MacInnis,et al.  ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium blockers, and diuretics for the control of systolic hypertension. , 2001, American journal of hypertension.

[4]  Bryan Williams,et al.  Diabetes accentuates the differential impact of blood pressure lowering drugs on central aortic pressure: Principal results from cafe-diabetes; The diabetic cohort within the conduit artery functional evaluation (CAFE) study , 2007 .

[5]  J. Izzo,et al.  Changes in Aortic Stiffness and Augmentation Index After Acute Converting Enzyme or Vasopeptidase Inhibition , 2005, Hypertension.

[6]  Michael F O'Rourke,et al.  Augmentation of the aortic and central arterial pressure waveform , 2004, Blood pressure monitoring.

[7]  Thomas Weber,et al.  Arterial Stiffness, Wave Reflections, and the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease , 2004, Circulation.

[8]  C. Reid,et al.  Correction of carotid augmentation index for heart rate in elderly essential hypertensives. ANBP2 Investigators. Australian Comparative Outcome Trial of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor- and Diuretic-Based Treatment of Hypertension in the Elderly. , 2001, American journal of hypertension.

[9]  M. O'Rourke,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of a Method for Estimating Ascending Aortic Pressure From the Radial Artery Pressure Waveform , 2001, Hypertension.

[10]  N. Westerhof,et al.  Aortic Input Impedance in Normal Man: Relationship to Pressure Wave Forms , 1980, Circulation.

[11]  G. A. Gibson,et al.  The Study of the Pulse, Arterial, Venous, and Hepatic, and of the Movements of the Heart , 1903, Edinburgh Medical Journal.

[12]  M. Karamanoglu,et al.  An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man. , 1993, European heart journal.

[13]  C. Hayward,et al.  Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human arterial pulse. , 1989, Circulation.

[14]  D. Levy,et al.  Changes in Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflection With Advancing Age in Healthy Men and Women: The Framingham Heart Study , 2004, Hypertension.

[15]  C. H. Chen,et al.  Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Validation of generalized transfer function. , 1997, Circulation.

[16]  Alun D. Hughes,et al.  Differential Impact of Blood Pressure–Lowering Drugs on Central Aortic Pressure and Clinical Outcomes: Principal Results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) Study , 2006 .

[17]  Giuseppe Mancia,et al.  Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) , 2000, The Lancet.

[18]  E. Barin,et al.  Effects of Isosorbide Mononitrate and AII Inhibition on Pulse Wave Reflection in Hypertension , 2003, Hypertension.

[19]  A. Weissler,et al.  Systolic Time Intervals in Heart Failure in Man , 1968, Circulation.

[20]  Christopher M Reid,et al.  Brachial Blood Pressure But Not Carotid Arterial Waveforms Predict Cardiovascular Events in Elderly Female Hypertensives , 2006, Hypertension.

[21]  M F O'Rourke.  Frederick Akbar Mahomed. , 1992, Hypertension.

[22]  M. Safar,et al.  Mechanism(s) of selective systolic blood pressure reduction after a low-dose combination of perindopril/indapamide in hypertensive subjects: comparison with atenolol. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  L. Boxt.  McDonald's blood flow in arteries , 1991, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[24]  M. Safar,et al.  Selective reduction of cardiac mass and central blood pressure on low-dose combination perindopril/indapamide in hypertensive subjects , 2004, Journal of hypertension.

[25]  A. Weissler,et al.  LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION TIME INDEX IN MAN. , 1963, Journal of applied physiology.

[26]  Thomas Weber,et al.  Increased arterial wave reflections predict severe cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2005, European heart journal.