Understanding and Misunderstanding

According to the classical view on language, language is a code and speakers encode meanings and listeners decode meanings using the same rules of grammar. This view is contrasted with an alternative view of language as a signaling system. This alternative language-as-signal view posits a distinction between the perspective of the speaker and the perspective of the listener, which aligns well with observed differences between language production and comprehension. A linguistic framework that formalizes the distinction between the speaker’s perspective and the listener’s perspective is Optimality Theory. It is shown how this constraint-based framework can account for mismatches between production and comprehension.

[1]  Chien Yu-Chin,et al.  Children's Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics , 1990 .

[2]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of give in New Zealand and American English , 2008 .

[3]  H. de Hoop,et al.  Asymmetries in language use reveal asymmetries in the grammar , 2005 .

[4]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Chapter 7 – Sentence Comprehension , 1995 .

[5]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[6]  Prashant Parikh,et al.  Language and Equilibrium , 2010 .

[7]  T. Reinhart,et al.  The innateness of binding and coreference , 1993 .

[8]  R. May Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation , 1985 .

[9]  Jennifer Spenader,et al.  Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[10]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Variability in early communicative development. , 1994, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[11]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Books Recieved , 2022, CL.

[12]  Helen de Hoop,et al.  Language acquisition in optimality theory , 2009 .

[13]  David Lodge,et al.  Small World: An Academic Romance , 1984 .

[14]  David Lewis Convention: A Philosophical Study , 1986 .

[15]  B. Tversky,et al.  Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking , 2009, Cognition.

[16]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Disfluency effects in comprehension: How new information can become accessible , 2011 .

[17]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production , 1963 .

[18]  H. Benedict,et al.  Early lexical development: comprehension and production , 1979, Journal of Child Language.

[19]  J. Katz The philosophy of language , 1967 .

[20]  Rick Dale,et al.  Listeners invest in an assumed other’s perspective despite cognitive cost , 2011, Cognition.

[21]  A. Gnanadesikan Constraints in Phonological Acquisition: Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology , 2004 .

[22]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[23]  P. Smolensky On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language , 1996 .

[24]  G. Nunberg The pragmatics of reference , 1978 .

[25]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Lexical semantics and compositionality. , 1995 .

[26]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition , 2010 .

[27]  Katherine Demuth,et al.  Markedness and the Development of Prosodic Structure , 1995 .

[28]  D. Hofstadter Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought, Douglas Hofstadter. 1994. Basic Books, New York, NY. 512 pages. ISBN: 0-465-05154-5. $30.00 , 1995 .

[29]  Reinhard Blutner,et al.  Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation , 2000, J. Semant..

[30]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[31]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[32]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[33]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  Learning phonotactic distributions , 2004 .

[34]  Michael Franke,et al.  Signal to act : game theory in pragmatics , 2009 .

[35]  R. Jakobson Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics , 2006 .

[36]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[37]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .

[38]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Pronoun co-referencing errors: Challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts , 2009 .

[39]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[40]  Michael Franke,et al.  Bidirectional Optimization from Reasoning and Learning in Games , 2012, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[41]  Joe Pater,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Receptive and Productive Development with Minimally Violable Constraints , 2004 .

[42]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[43]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Knowledge and Obedience: The Developmental Status of the Binding Theory , 1990 .

[44]  Joseph Weizenbaum,et al.  and Machine , 1977 .

[45]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Disfluency Effects in Comprehension , 2011 .

[46]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  One Frog, Two Frog, Red Frog, Blue Frog: Factors Affecting Children's Syntactic Choices in Production and Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[47]  Robert van Rooy,et al.  SIGNALLING GAMES SELECT HORN STRATEGIES , 2004 .

[48]  Neilson V. Smith,et al.  The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study , 2010 .

[49]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[50]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[51]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[52]  Anton Benz,et al.  Errors in Pragmatics , 2012, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[53]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  The Lexicon in Acquisition , 1996 .

[54]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  Jane Grimsahw Knwoledge and obedience: the developmental status of the binding theory , 1990 .

[56]  K. Lovell,et al.  The growth of the control of grammar in imitation, comphrehension, and production. , 1967, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[57]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Perspective taking and ellipsis in spatial descriptions , 1996 .

[58]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Comprehending spoken language: A blueprint of the listener , 1999 .

[59]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  Comprehension, Production, and Language Acquisition , 1983 .

[60]  R. May The grammar of quantification , 1978 .

[61]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[62]  M. Seligman,et al.  Language in the two-year old , 1976, Cognition.

[63]  J. Weizenbaum Computer Power And Human Reason: From Judgement To Calculation , 1978 .

[64]  V. Gathercole Some Myths You May Have Heard About First Language Acquisition , 1988 .

[65]  Bruce P. Hayes,et al.  Phonetically Driven Phonology: The Role of Optimality Theory and Inductive Grounding 1 , 2008 .

[66]  Kjell Johan Sæbø,et al.  A, The, Another: A Game of Same and Different , 2012, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[67]  L. Boroditsky Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors , 2000, Cognition.

[68]  P. Bloom,et al.  CHILDREN'S KNOWLEDGE OF BINDING AND COREFERENCE: EVIDENCE FROM SPONTANEOUS SPEECH , 1994 .