Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning

Abstract. The purpose of this study was to assess the radiation exposure of patients in several standard protocols in multi-slice CT (MSCT). Scanning protocols for neck, chest, abdomen, and spine were examined on a Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom MSCT (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with changing slice collimation (4×1, 4×2.5, and 4×5 mm), and pitch factors (1, 1.5, and 2). Effective doses were calculated from LiF–TLD measurements at several organ sites using an Alderson-Rando phantom and compared with calculations using the weighted CTDI. Effective dose for MSCT of the neck was 2.8 mSv. For different protocols for MSCT of the chest, 7.5–12.9 mSv were found. In abdominal MSCT protocols, effective dose varied between 12.4 and 16.1 mSv. The MSCT of the spine may lead to 12 mSv. An excellent correlation between the effective dose as determined by LiF–TLD and the calculated effective dose using the weighted CTDI could be demonstrated; however, a difference of up to 30% (mean 14.3%) was noted. Standard protocols for MSCT as measured in this study showed effective doses of up to16 mSv. Phantom measurement data show a good correlation to estimations using the weighted CTDI.

[1]  W A Kalender,et al.  Technical advances in multi-slice spiral CT. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[2]  K J Lehmann,et al.  Radiation dose and image quality in spiral computed tomography: multicentre evaluation at six institutions. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Horst Lenzen,et al.  Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT des Abdomens bei onkologischen Patienten: Einfluss von Tischvorschub und Detektorkonfiguration auf Bildqualität und Strahlenexposition , 2001 .

[4]  C H McCollough,et al.  CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. , 2001, Radiology.

[5]  B. Ghaye,et al.  Combined CT venography of the lower limbs and spiral CT angiography of pulmonary arteries in acute pulmonary embolism: preliminary results of a prospective study. , 2000, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[6]  U. Mödder,et al.  Radiation exposure in multi-slice CT of the heart. , 2001, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[7]  S Schaller,et al.  Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[8]  C H McCollough,et al.  Calculation of effective dose. , 2000, Medical physics.

[9]  W A Kalender,et al.  System performance of multislice spiral computed tomography. , 2000, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[10]  M Ashtari,et al.  Low-dose spiral computed tomography of the thorax: comparison with the standard-dose technique. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[11]  C H McCollough,et al.  Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. , 1999, Medical physics.

[12]  B. Schmidt,et al.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography , 1999, European Radiology.

[13]  W. Kalender,et al.  Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT. , 2001, Medical physics.

[14]  R. Felix,et al.  Berechnete organdosen und effektive Dosis für die computertomographische Untersuchung des Thorax und des Abdomens : Sind diese Dosen realistisch ? , 1996 .

[15]  T. Vogl,et al.  Radiation exposure in spiral computed tomography. Dose distribution and dose reduction. , 1999, Investigative radiology.

[16]  R Kötter,et al.  CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relationship between image quality and dose reduction. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  C. White,et al.  Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  Thomas Flohr.  Technische Grundlagen und Anwendungen der Mehrschicht-CT , 1999 .

[19]  D W McRobbie,et al.  Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, Influencing Parameters, Dose Assessment, Optimisation, Scanner Data, Terminology , 2001 .

[20]  W. Gilboy,et al.  The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  J. J. Broerse,et al.  Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  J. J. Broerse,et al.  Survey of CT techniques and absorbed dose in various Dutch hospitals. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[23]  K. Taguchi,et al.  Algorithm for image reconstruction in multi-slice helical CT. , 1998, Medical physics.

[24]  R. Felix,et al.  Relationships between physical dose quantities and patient dose in CT. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  U. Teichgräber,et al.  Survey of conventional and spiral ct doses. , 2001, Radiology.

[26]  M. Reiser,et al.  Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. , 2000, Radiology.

[27]  D. Nosske,et al.  Effective doses to members of the public from the diagnostic application of ionizing radiation in Germany , 1997, European Radiology.