A Comprehensive Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Sustainable Material Selection Considering Life Cycle Assessment Method

How to evaluate negative effects of automotive parts on environment in life cycle and select optimal sustainable material are intricate issues. A multi-criteria decision making model combining Techniques for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Information Entropy Method (IEM) for material selection considering life cycle assessment (LCA) method is proposed. This paper starts from establishing LCA technical framework and determining five environmental evaluation criteria. TOPSIS is utilized to rank materials and IEM is employed to assign criteria weights. Then, an automotive door outer panel is taken as an example to select the optimal material from 16 candidates utilizing proposed method. Here, the environmental equivalents of life cycle are calculated by GaBi software from acquisition of raw materials, manufacturing, using to end-of-life. In comparisons with the results of only considering environmental criteria and traditional evaluation criteria, it indicates that LCA is essential for material selection. Therefore, the environmental criteria, materials’ properties, manufacturing techniques, and durability properties are all considered to select the optimal candidate for obtaining parts with superior performance and less environmental impacts. Finally, the ranking results are obtained. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis is executed to prove that the IEM-TOPSIS method has outstanding robustness.

[1]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  On rank reversal and TOPSIS method , 2012, Math. Comput. Model..

[2]  Johan Springael,et al.  PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  I. Mazínová,et al.  Materials Selection in Mechanical Design , 2014 .

[4]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[5]  Wojciech Sałabun,et al.  The Characteristic Objects Method: A New Intelligent Decision Support Tool for Sustainable Manufacturing , 2016 .

[6]  S. M. Sapuan,et al.  Material screening and choosing methods: A review , 2010 .

[7]  Luis M. Camarinha-Matos,et al.  Data normalisation techniques in decision making: case study with TOPSIS method , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[8]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Sustainable material selection for construction industry – A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach , 2016 .

[9]  Dang Luo,et al.  The multi-attribute grey target decision method for attribute value within three-parameter interval grey number , 2012 .

[10]  Ying Luo,et al.  On rank reversal in decision analysis , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[11]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[12]  R. Khorshidi,et al.  Comparative analysis between TOPSIS and PSI methods of materials selection to achieve a desirable combination of strength and workability in Al/SiC composite , 2013 .

[13]  Geoffrey Davies,et al.  Materials For Automobile Bodies , 2003 .

[14]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Materials selection for nuclear applications: Challenges and opportunities , 2018 .

[15]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods , 2013 .

[16]  Sujit Das,et al.  The life-cycle impacts of aluminum body-in-white automotive material , 2000 .

[17]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[18]  Richard Jerz Combining the Resource Consumption Model (RCM) and the Cambridge Engineering Selector (CES) to Analyze Product Design , 2002 .

[19]  T. Gutowski,et al.  Material efficiency: providing material services with less material production , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Mahmoud Abdelhamid,et al.  Using Quality Function Deployment and Analytical Hierarchy Process for material selection of Body-In-White , 2011 .

[21]  Joseph R. Davis,et al.  Properties and selection : irons, steels, and high-performance alloys , 1995 .

[22]  Soheil Sadi-Nezhad,et al.  A new approach based on the level of reliability of information to determine the relative weights of criteria in fuzzy TOPSIS , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci..

[23]  Jagadish,et al.  Selection of Material for Optimal Design Using Multi-criteria Decision Making , 2014 .

[24]  John R. Doyle,et al.  A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best , 2001 .

[25]  Mohammed A. Omar The Automotive Body Manufacturing Systems and Processes , 2011 .

[26]  Ivan Tengbjerg Herrmann,et al.  Does it matter which Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tool you choose? – a comparative assessment of SimaPro and GaBi , 2015 .

[27]  Peng Wang,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[28]  Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari,et al.  A new multi-criteria decision making approach for sustainable material selection problem: A critical study on rank reversal problem , 2018 .

[29]  Alisa Mizikar,et al.  Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology , 2014 .

[30]  Sándor Imre,et al.  Eliminating Rank Reversal Phenomenon in GRA-Based Network Selection Method , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[31]  C. Yeh,et al.  A simulation comparison of normalization procedures for TOPSIS , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering.

[32]  Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari,et al.  A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems , 2017 .

[33]  R. Rao A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach , 2006 .

[34]  G. S. Daehn,et al.  Sustainable design and manufacture of lightweight vehicle structures , 2014 .

[35]  Anna Björklund,et al.  A material selection approach to evaluate material substitution for minimizing the life cycle environmental impact of vehicles , 2015 .