Patterns of Growth—Biomimetics and Architectural Design

This paper discusses the approach of biomimetic design in architecture applied to the theme of growth in biology by taking two exemplary research projects at the intersection of arts and sciences. The first project, ‘Biornametics’, dealt with patterns from nature; the second project ‘Growing as Building (GrAB)’ took on biological growth as a specific theme for the transfer to architecture and the arts. Within a timeframe of five years (2011–2015), the research was conducted under the Program for Arts-based Research PEEK (Programm zur Entwicklung und Erschliessung der Kunste) of the Austrian Science Fund FWF (Fonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung). The underlying hypothesis was that growth processes in nature have not been studied for transfer into technology and architecture yet and that, with advanced software tools, promising applications could be found. To ensure a high degree of innovation, this research was done with an interdisciplinary team of architects, engineers, and scientists (mainly biologists) to lay the groundwork for future product-oriented technological solutions. Growth, as one of the important characteristics of living organisms, is used as a frame for research into systems and principles that shall deliver innovative and sustainable solutions in architecture and the arts. Biomimetics as a methodology was used to create and guide information transfer from the life sciences to innovative proto-architectural solutions. The research aimed at transferring qualities present in biological growth; for example, adaptiveness, exploration, or local resource harvesting into technical design and production processes. In contrast to our current building construction, implementing principles of growth could potentially transform building towards a more integrated and sustainable setting, a new living architecture. Tools and methods, especially Quality Function Deployment (QFD) for matching biological role models with growth principles and architecturally desired functions and a Biolab as an experimentation platform are presented. Three main experimental trajectories were explored that matched the objectives of the research: (1) Transfer from biology into architecture, namely self-growing structures (proto-steps in form of a mobile 3D printer working with local material); (2) Integration of biology into material systems, namely fragmented waste matter grown into one solid building material (mycelium); and (3) Interventions in existing architecture, namely optimization of 3D path-finding through a single cell organism (slime mold).

[1]  Biren Prasad,et al.  Review of QFD and related deployment techniques , 1998 .

[2]  T. Ueda,et al.  Interaction between cell shape and contraction pattern in the Physarum plasmodium. , 2000, Biophysical chemistry.

[3]  B. Y. Duan,et al.  The mechanical design and kinematics accuracy analysis of a fine tuning stable platform for the large spherical radio telescope , 2000 .

[4]  T. Nakagaki,et al.  Path finding by tube morphogenesis in an amoeboid organism. , 2001, Biophysical chemistry.

[5]  Sandra Häuplik,et al.  Deployable structures for a human lunar base , 2006 .

[6]  Barbara Imhof,et al.  Transformation: Structure/space studies in bionics and space design , 2007 .

[7]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Biomimetics: lessons from nature–an overview , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Nuria Forcada,et al.  A methodology for predicting the severity of environmental impacts related to the construction process of residential buildings , 2009 .

[9]  Petra Gruber Biomimetics in Architecture: Architecture of Life and Buildings , 2010 .

[10]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Amoeba-Based Emergent Computing: Combinatorial Optimization and Autonomous Meta-Problem Solving , 2010, Int. J. Unconv. Comput..

[11]  Robert Aunger,et al.  What's Special About Human Technology? , 2010 .

[12]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Biomimetics: Nature-Based Innovation , 2011 .

[13]  Dörte Kuhlmann,et al.  Biomorphism in Architecture: Speculations on Growth and Form , 2011 .

[14]  George Jeronimidis,et al.  Has biomimetics arrived in architecture? , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[15]  Barbara Imhof,et al.  What is the architect doing in the jungle? Biornametics. , 2013 .

[16]  Jens Badura Explorative Practices in Dialogue. Art-based Research at the Interface of Arts, Sciences and Design , 2013 .

[17]  Julian F. V. Vincent,et al.  An Ontology of Biomimetics , 2014 .

[18]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Biologically Inspired Design , 2014 .

[19]  Andrew Adamatzky,et al.  Routing of Physarum polycephalum “signals” using simple chemicals , 2013, Communicative & integrative biology.

[20]  Maibritt Pedersen Zari,et al.  Ecosystem processes for biomimetic architectural and urban design , 2015 .

[21]  Julian Vincent,et al.  Methods of Science in Art , 2016 .

[22]  David Speck,et al.  Biomimetic bio-inspired biomorph sustainable? An attempt to classify and clarify biology-derived technical developments , 2017, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.