Adapting Visual Response System Teaching Technology to the Conventional Classroom

The Visual Response System (VRS) is a specially constructed resource room in which high rates of active student response and virtually immediate feedback for those responses can be achieved. Eight to ten student desks are arranged in a horseshoe configuration with the teacher's desk at the open end. Each student responds to every Instructional item (by writing, placing an object, pointing, etc.) directly on the stage of an overhead projector built into the desk. Research has shown the VRS to be an effective instructional technology for teaching a wide range of skills to various student populations. The three most powerful instructional features of the VRS are active student response, immediate feedback, and student-student interaction. Since the implementation of a full-scale VRS classroom with its hardware and space requirements may be too costly for many schools, and since an operating VRS classroom would still be able to serve only a portion of the many students needing more effective instruction each day, this article describes a number of inexpensive, practical techniques for adapting the instructional features of the VRS to the conventional classroom.

[1]  William L. Heward Applied Technology: Visual Response System: A Mediated Resource Room for Children with Learning Problems , 1978 .

[2]  P. Weisberg,et al.  EFFECTS OF DIRECT, INTERMITTENT, AND VICARIOUS REINFORCEMENT PROCEDURES ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF INSTRUCTION‐FOLLOWING BEHAVIORS IN A GROUP OF YOUNG CHILDREN1 , 1977 .

[3]  W. L. Heward,et al.  Acquisition of adjectives and adverbs in sentences written by hearing impaired and aphasic children. , 1979, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[4]  R. Van Houten,et al.  The effects of explicit timing and feedback on compositional response rate in elementary school children. , 1974, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[5]  R. Koegel,et al.  Normal peer models and autistic children's learning. , 1981, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[6]  W. L. Heward,et al.  Tutor Huddle: Key Element in a Classwide Peer Tutoring System , 1982, The Elementary School Journal.

[7]  A Practical Procedure to Maintain Pupils' Accurate Self-Rating in a Classroom Token Program , 1978 .

[8]  T. McLaughlin,et al.  Intrinsic reinforcers in a classroom token economy. , 1972, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  C. Madsen,et al.  Differential effects of fixed- and variable-time feedback on production rates of elementary school children. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[10]  R. Drabman,et al.  Self-control training in the classroom: a review and critique. , 1979, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  W. L. Heward,et al.  Teaching Self-Management to Incarcerated Youth , 1979 .