Estimating Vector Fields from Noisy Time Series

While there has been a surge of recent interest in learning differential equation models from time series, methods in this area typically cannot cope with highly noisy data. We break this problem into two parts: (i) approximating the unknown vector field (or right-hand side) of the differential equation, and (ii) dealing with noise. To deal with (i), we describe a neural network architecture consisting of tensor products of one-dimensional neural shape functions. For (ii), we propose an alternating minimization scheme that switches between vector field training and filtering steps, together with multiple trajectories of training data. We find that the neural shape function architecture retains the approximation properties of dense neural networks, enables effective computation of vector field error, and allows for graphical interpretability, all for data/systems in any finite dimension $d$. We also study the combination of either our neural shape function method or existing differential equation learning methods with alternating minimization and multiple trajectories. We find that retrofitting any learning method in this way boosts the method's robustness to noise. While in their raw form the methods struggle with 1% Gaussian noise, after retrofitting, they learn accurate vector fields from data with 10% Gaussian noise.

[1]  Steven L. Brunton,et al.  Deep learning of dynamics and signal-noise decomposition with time-stepping constraints , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  Giang Tran,et al.  Exact Recovery of Chaotic Systems from Highly Corrupted Data , 2016, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[3]  Linan Zhang,et al.  On the Convergence of the SINDy Algorithm , 2018, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[4]  Samuel Rudy,et al.  Smoothing and parameter estimation by soft-adherence to governing equations , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  Paris Perdikaris,et al.  Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part II): Data-driven Discovery of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations , 2017, ArXiv.

[6]  E. Stewart,et al.  Fingerprint Discovery for Transformer Health Prognostics from Micro-Phasor Measurements , 2019 .

[7]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Proximal Algorithms , 2013, Found. Trends Optim..

[8]  Paris Perdikaris,et al.  Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations , 2017, ArXiv.

[9]  H. Schaeffer,et al.  Learning partial differential equations via data discovery and sparse optimization , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  S. Brunton,et al.  Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Harish S. Bhat,et al.  A Block Coordinate Descent Proximal Method for Simultaneous Filtering and Parameter Estimation , 2018, ICML.

[12]  Helmut Bölcskei,et al.  Optimal Approximation with Sparsely Connected Deep Neural Networks , 2017, SIAM J. Math. Data Sci..

[13]  J. Ramsay,et al.  Dynamic Data Analysis: Modeling Data with Differential Equations , 2017 .