Reconfiguring Scale and Power: The Khong-Chi-Mun Project in Northeast Thailand

This paper uses the case of the Khong-Chi-Mun (KCM) interbasin transfer project in northeast Thailand to explore questions of power and scale in the context of state intervention in river basins. The KCM project figures strongly in the Thai state's long-term aim of transforming its water-poor northeast region through large-scale irrigation works and agroindustrial development. The project has also become a key element in interstate negotiations over coordinated development of the Lower Mekong Basin. The early stages of the project have met with resistance in the form of both national and local Thai social movements arguing against it on social justice and ecological grounds. Proponents of the project in the Thai government are employing different scalar narratives to justify and legitimate implementation of the scheme. Scale and power are intimately related within complex environmental conflicts, and tracing their linkages through an array of actors and across a variety of scales, the approach associated with actor-network methodologies, can reveal a great deal about how power and scale are co-created.

[1]  Noel Castree,et al.  The construction of nature and the nature of construction: analytical and political tools for building survivable futures: Nature at the Millennium , 1998 .

[2]  David Slater.  Spatialities of Power and Postmodern Ethics—Rethinking Geopolitical Encounters , 1997 .

[3]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  The Spatialization of Politics: Local and National Actor-Spaces in Environmental Conflict , 1995 .

[4]  S. Marston.  The social construction of scale , 2000 .

[5]  C. Sneddon.  Water Conflicts and River Basins: The Contradictions of Comanagement and Scale in Northeast Thailand , 2002 .

[6]  Chris Philo,et al.  Entanglements of Power: Geographies of Domination/Resistance , 2000 .

[7]  T. Luke.  Sustainable development as a power/knowledge system: the problem of ‘governmentality’ , 1995 .

[8]  Eric Darier.  Discourses of the environment , 1999 .

[9]  E. Swyngedouw.  Power, Nature, and the City. The Conquest of Water and the Political Ecology of Urbanization in Guayaquil, Ecuador: 1880–1990 , 1997 .

[10]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[11]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Powers of Association , 1984 .

[12]  B. Latour,et al.  Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? , 1986 .

[13]  Kate Jones.  Scale as epistemology , 1998 .

[14]  N. Smith,et al.  Spaces of Vulnerability , 1996 .

[15]  Kevin R. Cox,et al.  Representation and power in the politics of scale , 1998 .

[16]  Mitch Rose.  The Seductions of Resistance: Power, Politics, and a Performative Style of Systems , 2002 .

[17]  E. Swyngedouw.  Authoritarian Governance, Power, and the Politics of Rescaling , 2000 .

[18]  H. Leitner,et al.  The political construction of scale , 1997 .

[19]  J. Murdoch.  The spaces of actor-network theory , 1998 .

[20]  Leila M. Harris,et al.  Contested Waters: Conflict, Scale, and Sustainability in Aquatic Socioecological Systems , 2002 .

[21]  N. Brenner.  The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration , 2001 .

[22]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme. , 2000 .

[23]  Michel Callon,et al.  Agency and the Hybrid Collectif , 1995, Mathematics, Science, and Postclassical Theory.

[24]  S. Tunstall,et al.  Translating nature: river restoration as nature – culture , 2000 .

[25]  A. Amin.  Spatialities of Globalisation , 2002 .

[26]  J. Glassman.  From Seattle (and Ubon) to Bangkok: The Scales of Resistance to Corporate Globalization , 2002 .

[27]  A. Rambo.  The human ecology of rural resource management in northeast Thailand , 1991 .

[28]  R. Howitt.  Scale and the other: Levinas and geography , 2002 .

[29]  David Slater.  Other Domains of Democratic Theory: Space, Power, and the Politics of Democratization , 2002 .

[30]  B. Hindess.  Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault , 1996 .

[31]  Noel Castree,et al.  he construction of nature and the nature of construction: analytical and political tools for building survivable futures , 2005 .

[32]  Neil Smith,et al.  States, scales and households: limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner , 2001 .

[33]  S. Wongsomsak.  Salinization in Northeast Thailand , 1986 .

[34]  B. Latour.  On Recalling Ant , 1999 .

[35]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[36]  Jarmo Kortelainen,et al.  The river as an actor-network: the Finnish forest industry utilization of lake and river systems , 1999 .

[37]  B. Jessop.  The Crisis of the National Spatio-Temporal Fix and the Tendential Ecological Dominance of Globalizing Capitalism , 2000 .

[38]  Martin Jones.  The Rise of the Regional State in Economic Governance: ‘Partnerships for Prosperity’ Or New Scales of State Power? , 2001 .

[39]  Sarah Whatmore,et al.  Nourishing Networks: Alternative Geographies of Food , 1997 .

[40]  S. Levin.  THE PROBLEM OF PATTERN AND SCALE IN ECOLOGY , 1992 .

[41]  S. Tunstall,et al.  Translating nature: river restoration as nature-culture , 2000 .

[42]  E. Swyngedouw,et al.  Neither Global Nor Local: ?Glocalization' and the Politics of Scale , 2001 .

[43]  M. Dean,et al.  Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society , 1999 .

[44]  Roger Lee.  Radical and Postmodern? Power, Social Relations, and Regimes of Truth in the Social Construction of Alternative Economic Geographies , 2000 .