Comprehension and production of movement-derived sentences by Russian speakers with agrammatic aphasia

Abstract This study explored the way Russian speakers with agrammatism understand and repeat movement-derived sentences, and examined whether they use morpho-syntactic cues to assist comprehension. The comprehension of three Russian-speaking individuals with agrammatism was tested, and their performance was compared to 15 matched control participants. In addition, the repetition ability of one of the participants was assessed. The study included topicalization structures, relative clauses, and SVO sentences. The individuals with agrammatism performed at chance level on topicalization structures and object relative clauses, whereas their comprehension of SVO sentences and subject relatives was significantly better and above chance. Their comprehension of topicalization structures was poor although all sentences included morphological cues of case marking on the topicalized object and on the subject. Case and gender morphology on the relative pronoun did not lead to better comprehension of object relative clauses compared to relative clauses in which gender inflection could not be used as a cue for interpretation. The repetition task indicated a considerable difficulty in repetition of sentences that include syntactic movement to high nodes of the syntactic tree.

[1]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  The syntactic characterization of agrammatism , 1984, Cognition.

[2]  L. Haegeman Elements of Grammar , 1997 .

[3]  A. Damasio,et al.  Lesion analysis in neuropsychology , 1989 .

[4]  L. S. Tsvetkova,et al.  A NEUROLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF EXPRESSIVE AGRAMMATISM IN DIFFERENT FORMS OF APHASIA , 1975 .

[5]  D. Swinney,et al.  Syntactic Processing in Aphasia , 1995, Brain and Language.

[6]  Y. Grodzinsky,et al.  A blueprint for a brain map of syntax1 , 2004 .

[7]  V. Bianchi The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: A Reply to Borsley , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[8]  L. Rizzi The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[9]  Margrietha Esther Ruigendijk Case assignment in Agrammatism: a cross-linguistic study , 2001 .

[10]  T. Hendler,et al.  The Neural Reality of Syntactic Transformations , 2003, Psychological science.

[11]  L. Tan,et al.  Functional anatomy of syntactic and semantic processing in language comprehension , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[12]  D. Swinney,et al.  How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia , 2008, Brain and Language.

[13]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1991 .

[14]  Artemis Alexiadou,et al.  The syntax of relative clauses , 2000 .

[15]  Resumption in Slavic: Phases, Cyclicity, and Case , 2003 .

[16]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Accessibility of case and gender contrasts for agent-object assignment in Broca's aphasics and fluent anomics , 1987, Brain and Language.

[17]  Marjorie Lorch Agrammatic aphasia: A cross-language narrative sourcebook , 1992 .

[18]  Irina A. Sekerina The syntax and processing of scrambling constructions in Russian , 1997 .

[19]  Y. Grodzinsky Theoretical perspectives on language deficits , 1990 .

[20]  S. Milekić,et al.  Comprehension of nonlexical categories in agrammatism , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[21]  David Caplan,et al.  Effects of Syntactic Structure and Propositional Number on Patterns of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Richard S. Kayne The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[23]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  A redefinition of the syndrome of Broca's aphasia: Implications for a neuropsychological model of language , 1980, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[24]  Robert Freidin,et al.  The Subject of Defective T(ense) in Slavic , 2002 .

[25]  Greville G. Corbett,et al.  The Slavonic Languages , 1993 .

[26]  Valentina Bianchi,et al.  Some Issues in the Syntax of Relative Determiners , 2000 .

[27]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Question Production in Agrammatism: The Tree Pruning Hypothesis , 2002, Brain and Language.

[28]  M. Alexander,et al.  Broca's area aphasias , 1990, Neurology.

[29]  Y. Grodzinsky,et al.  The battle for Broca’s region , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Maria Teresa Guasti,et al.  Agrammatism, syntactic theory, and the lexicon: Broca's area and the development of linguistic ability in the human brain , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  J. A. Pruszynski,et al.  Neural correlates , 2023 .

[33]  N. Friedmann Traceless relatives: Agrammatic comprehension of relative clauses with resumptive pronouns , 2008, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[34]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism I. Comprehension , 1980, Brain and Language.

[35]  Jean-Roger Vergnaud French relative clauses. , 1974 .

[36]  K. Amunts,et al.  Broca's region , 2006 .

[37]  N. Alpert,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, Brain and Language.

[38]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Speech production in broca's agrammatic aphasia: Syntactic tree pruning , 2009 .

[39]  A. Luria TWO KINDS OF DISORDERS IN THE COMPREHENSION OF GRAMMATICAL CONSTRUCTIONS , 1975 .

[40]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Verb-Argument Structure Processing in Complex Sentences in Broca′s and Wernicke′s Aphasia , 1993, Brain and Language.

[41]  Tracy Holloway King Configuring topic and focus in Russian , 1995 .

[42]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Agrammatic comprehension of relative clauses , 1989, Brain and Language.

[43]  N. Friedmann,et al.  Morphology does not help comprehension in agrammatism: A study of German and Hebrew , 2003, Brain and Language.

[44]  Marguerite Ann Browning,et al.  Null operator constructions , 1987 .

[45]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[46]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments , 2004, NeuroImage.

[47]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Sentence comprehension and working memory limitation in aphasia: A dissociation between semantic-syntactic and phonological reactivation , 2003, Brain and Language.

[48]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[49]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Form and Content Dissociating Syntax and Semantics in Sentence Comprehension , 1999, Neuron.

[50]  Weijia Ni,et al.  Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[51]  Harry A. Whitaker,et al.  Studies in neurolinguistics , 1976 .

[52]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia , 1976, Brain and Language.

[53]  Cynthia K Thompson,et al.  The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: the complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE). , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[54]  Carlo Cecchetto,et al.  Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1996 .

[55]  W. O'grady,et al.  A mapping theory of agrammatic comprehension deficits , 2005, Brain and Language.

[56]  Y. Grodzinsky,et al.  Tense and Agreement in Agrammatic Production: Pruning the Syntactic Tree , 1997, Brain and Language.

[57]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  An fMRI study of syntactic layers: Sentential and lexical aspects of embedding , 2009, NeuroImage.

[58]  N Friedmann,et al.  Agrammatism and the Psychological Reality of the Syntactic Tree , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[59]  Naama Friedmann Generalizations on variations in comprehension and production: A further source of variation and a possible account , 2006, Brain and Language.

[60]  Y. Grodzinsky The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[61]  N. Friedmann,et al.  Do people with agrammatic aphasia understand verb movement? , 2006 .

[62]  N. Friedmann,et al.  Working memory and sentence comprehension 1 Is phonological working memory involved in sentence comprehension ? The difference between phonological and semantic reactivation , 2007 .

[63]  R. Borsley Remarks and replies , 1997 .

[64]  Noam Chomsky Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use , 1988 .

[65]  Daryl Spencer Aspects of the syntax of relative clauses in colloquial and standard Russian , 1993 .

[66]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Predication , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[67]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[68]  N. Friedmann,et al.  On the relation between structural case, determiners, and verbs in agrammatism: A study of Hebrew and Dutch , 2008 .

[69]  Adam Szczegielniak,et al.  Two Types of Relative Clauses in Slavic – Evidence from Reconstruction and Ellipsis , 2006 .

[70]  S. Crain,et al.  Syntactic Processing in Agrammatic Aphasia by Speakers of a Slavic Language , 1995, Brain and Language.

[71]  A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects , 2004, Brain and Language.

[72]  Barbara Citko,et al.  On Headed, Headless, and Light-Headed Relatives , 2004 .

[73]  F. Dick,et al.  Language deficits, localization, and grammar: evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. , 2001, Psychological review.

[74]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  An Invitation to cognitive science , 1997 .

[75]  M. Just,et al.  Aphasic Sentence Comprehension as a Resource Deficit: A Computational Approach , 1997, Brain and Language.

[76]  E. Zurif,et al.  The Critical Role of Group Studies in Neuropsychology: Comprehension Regularities in Broca's Aphasia , 1999, Brain and Language.

[77]  Lewis P. Shapiro,et al.  Treating Language Deficits in Broca's Aphasia , 2006 .

[78]  Ivo Mimica,et al.  Agrammatism in a case-inflected language: Comprehension of agent-object relations , 1984, Brain and Language.

[79]  Jason W. Brown MENN, LISE, AND OBLER, LORAINE, EDS. Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook , 1991 .

[80]  D. C. Howell,et al.  Comparing an Individual's Test Score Against Norms Derived from Small Samples , 1998 .

[81]  Anna Erechko,et al.  Subject-Verb Inversion in Russian , 2002 .

[82]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Question production in Dutch agrammatism , 2004, Brain and Language.

[83]  G. Hickok,et al.  Comprehension of Wh-Questions in Two Broca's Aphasics , 1996, Brain and Language.

[84]  S. Crain,et al.  Sensitivity to inflectional morphology in agrammatism: Investigation of a highly inflected language , 1988, Brain and Language.

[85]  Jean-Yves Pollock Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP , 1989 .

[86]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[87]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  A syntactic specialization for Broca's area. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[88]  G. Waters,et al.  PET Studies of Syntactic Processing with Auditory Sentence Presentation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[89]  D. Caplan,et al.  Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia , 1985, Cognition.

[90]  E. Bates,et al.  Processing of Grammatical Gender in Normal and Aphasic Speakers of Russian , 2001, Cortex.

[91]  John Frederick Bailyn,et al.  Generalized Inversion , 2004 .