Optimised random structure vehicular sensor network

Providing proper coverage is one of the main applications of wireless sensor networks. In many working environments, it is necessary to take advantage of mobile sensor networks (MSNs), with the capability of having cooperation between sensor nodes and moving into appropriate positions, to provide the required coverage. However, in some applications such as intelligent transport system (ITS), where sensors are applied in complex dense urban environments, traditional MSN cannot properly cover the defined area. In this study, the authors study the use of a few unreserved selected cars as a vehicular sensor network (VSN) to cover a defined area and in this scenario, the sensors movements are assumed to be random from the network viewpoint. In the proposed random structure VSN, the coverage property is managed and controlled by introducing a suggested method for resource allocation and coverage control based on the real vehicle mobility model. Major advantages of this VSN are considering the real car mobility model, compatibility with the deployed infrastructure and processing simplicity and efficiency. The implementation results of suggested method verify the analytical results that are mentioned in the simulation section.

[1]  Sonia Martínez,et al.  Coverage control for mobile sensing networks , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  R. Bertini,et al.  Transit Buses as Traffic Probes: Use of Geolocation Data for Empirical Evaluation , 2004 .

[3]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[4]  Miodrag Potkonjak,et al.  Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[5]  Syed Masud Mahmud,et al.  Analysis of attacks against the security of keyless-entry systems for vehicles and suggestions for improved designs , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Kian Hsiang Low,et al.  Autonomic mobile sensor network with self-coordinated task allocation and execution , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[7]  Paolo Bellavista,et al.  Dissemination and Harvesting of Urban Data Using Vehicular Sensing Platforms , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[8]  Liang Zou,et al.  Arterial speed studies with taxi equipped with global positioning receivers as probe vehicle , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2005..

[9]  Christos G. Cassandras,et al.  Sensor Networks and Cooperative Control , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Paeiz Azmi,et al.  A stochastic vehicle mobility model with environmental condition adaptation capability , 2009 .

[11]  Peng-Jun Wan,et al.  Coverage by randomly deployed wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Thomas F. La Porta,et al.  Movement-Assisted Sensor Deployment , 2006, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[13]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  A game theoretical framework for dynamic pricing-based routing in self-organized MANETs , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Marco Ruffini,et al.  The application-based clustering concept and requirements for intervehicle networks , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  Li Zhao,et al.  Monitoring system of car-guardrail accident based on wireless sensor networks , 2008, 2008 8th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications.

[16]  Phillip R. Chandler,et al.  UAV cooperative control , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).