Patch Configuration Non-linearly Affects Sediment Loss across Scales in a Grazed Catchment in North-east Australia

A bstractA principle of the cross-scale interaction (CSI) framework is that disturbance-induced landscape changes resulting in coarser-grained spatial structure may non-linearly amplify transfer processes across scales. We studied suspended sediment losses at two spatial scales (0.24 m2 plots and ca. 0.25 ha hillslopes of about 140 m in length) in a semiarid savanna landscape to determine whether the spatial structure of grassy and bare soil areas introduced a non-linear amplification of sediment loss. Sediment loss rates from 0.24 m2 bare plots averaged 1.527 t ha−1 y−1, which was 23 times the loss rate from nearby grassy plots (0.066 t ha−1 y−1). These rates were then extrapolated linearly to two hillslopes separated by only 200 m and having similar total grass cover, slope and soil type but differing in the spatial structure of bare soil patches. The coarse-grained hillslope had a large bare patch on its lower slope, whereas the fine-grained hillslope had no bare soil patches when quantified at a 4 m grid-cell resolution. Measured sediment loss from the fine-grained hillslope averaged 0.050 t ha−1 y−1, whereas the average sediment loss from the coarse-grained hillslope was 2.133 t ha−1 y−1. By linearly extrapolating from the plot scale, the expected sediment loss for the fine-grained hillslope was 0.066 t ha−1 y−1, which is similar to that observed. The expected sediment loss for the coarse-grained hillslope was 0.855 t ha−1 y−1, where linear extrapolation assumed a 46:54 ratio of bare to grassy plots and that the spatial arrangement of plots does not affect sediment loss processes. For the coarse-grained hillslope observed sediment loss is 2.5 times greater than that expected by linear extrapolation from the plot scale. This result indicates a cross-scale interaction related to spatial configuration of patches. We suggest that there were non-linearities in hillslope ecohydrological transfer processes (runoff, erosion) across scales due to a specific patch configuration that greatly amplified sediment loss because the pattern failed to slow runoff and retain sediment before it entered a creek. This example supports the CSI framework and indicates the importance of considering the effect of spatial structure when predicting system dynamics at different scales.

[1]  C. Allen,et al.  ECOHYDROLOGY OF A RESOURCE‐CONSERVING SEMIARID WOODLAND: EFFECTS OF SCALE AND DISTURBANCE , 2003 .

[2]  P. N. Nelson,et al.  Water and nutrient cycling processes , 2004 .

[3]  Juan Puigdefábregas,et al.  The role of vegetation patterns in structuring runoff and sediment fluxes in drylands , 2005 .

[4]  Kinsey-Henderson.  Modelling Spatial Patterns of Runoff on a Hillslope: Implications for Fine Sediment Delivery , 2005 .

[5]  D. Post,et al.  A sediment budget for a grazed semi-arid catchment in the Burdekin basin, Australia , 2007 .

[6]  D. Post,et al.  Sustainable grazing for a Healthy Burdekin Catchment , 2003 .

[7]  Matthias M. Boer,et al.  Effects of spatially structured vegetation patterns on hillslope erosion in a semiarid Mediterranean environment: a simulation study , 2005 .

[8]  Jerry C. Ritchie,et al.  Patterns of Soil Erosion and Redeposition on Lucky Hills Watershed, Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed, Arizona , 2005 .

[9]  A. Steegen,et al.  The influence of both process descriptions and runoff patterns on predictions from a spatially distributed soil erosion model , 2005, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.

[10]  Debra P. C. Peters,et al.  Strategies for ecological extrapolation , 2004 .

[11]  Hong S. He,et al.  An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  John Lathrop Mathews,et al.  Conservation of Water , 2008, Nature.

[13]  Jon Brodie,et al.  Sources of sediment to the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. , 2005, Marine pollution bulletin.

[14]  A. Covich,et al.  Cascading events in linked ecological and socioeconomic systems , 2007 .

[15]  D. Tongway,et al.  Landscape Ecology, Function and Management: Principles from Australia's Rangelands , 1996 .

[16]  John A. Ludwig,et al.  Runoff and erosion from Australia's tropical semi‐arid rangelands: influence of ground cover for differing space and time scales , 2006 .

[17]  Andrew Ash,et al.  Learning From History to Survive in the Future: Management Evolution on Trafalgar Station, North-East Queensland. , 1998 .

[18]  D. Tongway,et al.  VEGETATION PATCHES AND RUNOFF–EROSION AS INTERACTING ECOHYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES IN SEMIARID LANDSCAPES , 2005 .

[19]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Cross–Scale Interactions and Changing Pattern–Process Relationships: Consequences for System Dynamics , 2007, Ecosystems.