Performance tuning for robot manipulators using intelligent robust controller

This paper introduces a robust controller with performance tuning for robot manipulators. A new hybrid idea based on feedback linearization, Lyapunov’s second method and the genetic algorithm (GA) are applied for designing an intelligent robust controller. The inverse dynamic method is used to design a controller linearizing and decoupling the nonlinear manipulator dynamics. Because of the uncertainties in manipulator dynamics, the additional controller is used to achieve robustness designed by Lyapunov’s second method. Hence, robust stability is satisfied for manipulator dynamics. To attain robust performance, an uncertainty area is defined in an error phase portrait which must be minimized. In order to optimize this criterion, GA is employed to find the robust controller parameters. In fact, our criterion in designing the intelligent robust controller is both robust stability and robust performance simultaneously. Simulation and experimental results verify the proposed method through a four-bar linkage robot as a case study. The introduced theory might be considered as a promising way for the wide range class of nonlinear dynamic systems with uncertainties. Experiments are implemented on the robot using xPC target bearing the Hardware In the Loop property.

[1]  H. Sarimveis,et al.  Robust nonlinear H∞ control of hyperbolic distributed parameter systems , 2009 .

[2]  Haralambos Sarimveis,et al.  Nonlinear robust control of parabolic distributed parameter systems by means of radial basis function neural networks and singular value , 2009, 2009 European Control Conference (ECC).

[3]  Chang-Hua Lien,et al.  LMI optimization approach on robustness and H∞ control analysis for observer-based control of uncertain systems , 2008 .

[4]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  Modeling and Control of Robot Manipulators , 1995 .

[5]  P. Apkarian,et al.  Advanced gain-scheduling techniques for uncertain systems , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[6]  GZ Georgo Angelis,et al.  System analysis, modelling and control with polytopic linear models , 2001 .

[7]  Marco H. Terra,et al.  Fault-tolerant robot manipulators based on output-feedback Hinfinity controllers , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  A. Isidori,et al.  Disturbance attenuation and H/sub infinity /-control via measurement feedback in nonlinear systems , 1992 .

[9]  Ricardo C. L. F. Oliveira,et al.  LMI approach for H linear parameter-varying state feedback control , 2005 .

[10]  A. Schaft L/sub 2/-gain analysis of nonlinear systems and nonlinear state-feedback H/sub infinity / control , 1992 .

[11]  J. Park,et al.  Nonlinear H, Control of Robotic Manipulator , 2000 .

[12]  Akira Shimokohbe,et al.  Robustness evaluation of three friction compensation methods for point-to-point (PTP) positioning systems , 2005, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[13]  M. Spong,et al.  Robot Modeling and Control , 2005 .