Geometric, kinetic-kinematic, and intentional constraints influence willingness to pass under a barrier.

Completing a goal directed behavior in a safe and efficient manner requires that a perceiver-actor is sensitive to the various constraints on performing that behavior and adjust his or her movements accordingly. When attempting to pass under a barrier, people adjust their ducking behavior based on the likelihood and potential costs of a collision (van der Meer, 1997). In three experiments, we investigated whether participants are sensitive to geometric (standing height), kinetic-kinematic (anticipated movement speed), and intentional (material properties of the barrier) constraints on passing under a barrier even before attempting to perform this behavior. Although Experiment 1 failed to show that anticipated movement speed influenced perception of whether a barrier could be passed under, Experiment 2 found that this factor influences willingness to attempt the behavior. Experiments 3a and 3b found that the material properties of the barrier itself also influence willingness to attempt the behavior. Together, the results highlight the contribution of geometric, kinetic-kinematic, and intentional constraints to perception.

[1]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.

[2]  Franz Mechsner,et al.  A Psychological Approach to Human Voluntary Movements , 2004 .

[3]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Jeffrey B. Wagman,et al.  Perception of affordances for standing on an inclined surface depends on height of center of mass , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Audrey L. H. van der Meer,et al.  Visual guidance of passing under a barrier , 1997 .

[8]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[9]  J. Konczak,et al.  Changing affordances in stair climbing: the perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Rapid recalibration based on optic flow in visually guided action , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  M. Turvey Space (and Its Perception): The First and Final Frontier , 2004 .

[13]  M. Turvey Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology , 1992 .

[14]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Jeffrey B. Wagman,et al.  Perception of Affordances for Walking Under a Barrier From Proximal and Distal Points of Observation , 2008 .

[16]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Ecological foundations of cognition. II: Degrees of freedom and conserved quantities in animal-environment systems , 1999 .

[17]  J. Wagman,et al.  Perception of whether an object can be carried through an aperture depends on anticipated speed. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[19]  Alva Noë,et al.  Action in Perception , 2006, Representation and Mind.

[20]  Jeffrey B Wagman,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Kinetic Potential Influences Visual and Remote Haptic Perception of Affordances for Standing on an Inclined Surface , 2022 .

[21]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[22]  Michael E. Cinelli,et al.  Locomotion through apertures when wider space for locomotion is necessary: adaptation to artificially altered bodily states , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Determinants of the center of mass trajectory in human walking and running. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  D. Proffitt Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[27]  A. Clark Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[28]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perceiving Distance: A Role of Effort and Intent , 2004, Perception.

[29]  Robert E. Shaw,et al.  Ecological mechanics: A physical geometry for intentional constraints , 1988 .