Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The use of "that" in the Production and Comprehension of Object Relative Clauses , 2003 .
[2] Tessa C. Warren,et al. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity , 2002, Cognition.
[3] Thomas Wasow,et al. Processing as a Source of Accessibility Effects on Variation , 2005 .
[4] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence , 2007 .
[5] M. Schwartz,et al. Impairments of sentence comprehension , 1994 .
[6] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Dynamical models of sentence processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..
[7] John Hale,et al. A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.
[8] J. V. Van Dyke. Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[9] David R. Dowty. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .
[10] John C. Trueswell,et al. Tense, Temporal Context, and Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. , 1991 .
[11] Herbert Schriefers,et al. Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush , 2006 .
[12] Mark Aronoff,et al. Contemporary linguistics: An introduction , 1989 .
[13] G. Waters,et al. Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences , 1996, Memory & cognition.
[14] J. A. Dyke. Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007 .
[15] 益子 真由美. Argument Structure , 1993, The Lexicon.
[16] Marily Ford,et al. A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences , 1983 .
[17] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[18] Brian MacWhinney,et al. The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian , 1988, Cognition.
[19] G. Waters,et al. Working memory and written sentence comprehension , 1987 .
[20] P. D. Eimas,et al. Speech, language, and communication , 1997 .
[21] Janet D. Fodor,et al. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.
[22] K. Bock,et al. From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992 .
[23] John Hale,et al. Uncertainty About the Rest of the Sentence , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[24] G. Waters,et al. The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter (1992) , 1996, Psychological review.
[25] K. Bock,et al. From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.
[26] John C. Trueswell,et al. The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. , 1989 .
[27] Lyn Frazier,et al. Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser , 1989 .
[28] K. McRae,et al. Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts , 2001 .
[29] G. Waters,et al. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[30] Linda Cupples,et al. The structural characteristics and on-line comprehension of experiencer-verb sentences , 2002 .
[31] Douglas Roland,et al. Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[32] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .
[33] Richard L. Lewis,et al. An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[34] C. Clifton,et al. Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies , 1989 .
[35] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.
[36] Christopher T. Kello,et al. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[37] Dan Jurafsky,et al. Probabilistic Modeling in Psycholinguistics: Linguistic Comprehension and Production , 2006 .
[38] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). , 2002, Psychological review.
[39] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Verb Argument Structure in Parsing and Interpretation: Evidence from wh-Questions , 1995 .
[40] K Christianson,et al. Misinterpretations of Garden-Path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[41] Kate Stewart,et al. Starting points , 2020, SIGP.
[42] H E Wanner,et al. An ATN approach to comprehension , 1978 .
[43] K. Rayner,et al. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[44] Robin K. Morris,et al. Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .
[45] G. Miller,et al. Linguistic theory and psychological reality , 1982 .
[46] Edward Gibson,et al. Syntactic Complexity in Ambiguity Resolution , 2002 .
[47] Herbert Schriefers,et al. The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing , 2002 .
[48] B. Levin,et al. The formation of adjectival passives , 1985 .
[49] Gennaro Chierchia,et al. Structured Meanings, Thematic Roles and Control , 1989 .
[50] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records , 1995 .
[51] M. Just,et al. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .
[52] M. Pickering,et al. Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies:An Eye-Tracking Study , 1996 .
[53] M. Just,et al. From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .
[54] M. MacDonald,et al. Individual Differences and Probabilistic Constraints in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1995 .
[55] Gennaro Chierchia,et al. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics , 1990 .
[56] C. Phillips,et al. Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .
[57] P. Gordon,et al. Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[58] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .
[59] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[60] P. Gordon,et al. Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity , 2004 .
[61] Edward Gibson,et al. Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[62] R Baird,et al. Recall of grammatical relations within clause-containing sentences , 1974, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[63] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[64] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .
[65] E. Gibson. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.
[66] David R. Dowty. On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’ , 1989 .
[67] M. MacDonald. The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity , 1993 .
[68] Dedre Gentner,et al. Relations, Objects, and the Composition of Analogies , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[69] Andy P. Field,et al. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .
[70] A. Sheldon. The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English , 1973 .
[71] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses , 2009, Cognition.
[72] Mark Steedman,et al. Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.
[73] F. Ferreira. Choice of Passive Voice is Affected by Verb Type and Animacy , 1994 .
[74] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993 .
[75] B. MacWhinney,et al. STARTING POINTS , 1977 .
[76] M. Pickering,et al. Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study , 1998 .
[77] Julie E. Boland. The Relationship Between Syntactic and Semantic Processes in Sentence Comprehension. , 1997 .
[78] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Linguistic Structure in Language Processing , 1988 .
[79] Liliane Haegeman,et al. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1991 .
[80] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities , 2003 .
[81] John C. Trueswell,et al. Chapter 7 – Sentence Comprehension , 1995 .
[82] John Whitman,et al. --; CHARLES CLIFTON; and JANET RANDALL. 1983. Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension. Cognition 13.187-222. , and JANET FODOR. 1978. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition , 1997 .
[83] A. Belletti,et al. Psych-verbs and θ-theory , 1988 .
[84] Brian MacWhinney,et al. The emergence of language. , 1999 .
[85] G. Altmann,et al. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.
[86] Brian MacWhinney,et al. Basic Syntactic Processes , 1982 .
[87] Robin K. Morris,et al. Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses , 2005 .
[88] Michael Tomasello,et al. Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses , 2007 .