Performance optimization of the Varian aS500 EPID system

Today, electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) are widely used as a replacement to portal films for patient position verification, but the image quality is not always optimal. The general aim of this study was to optimize the acquisition parameters of an amorphous silicon EPID commercially available for clinical use in radiation therapy with the view to avoid saturation of the system. Special attention was paid to selection of the parameter corresponding to the number of rows acquired between accelerator pulses (NRP) for various beam energies and dose rates. The image acquisition system (IAS2) has been studied, and portal image acquisition was found to be strongly dependent on the accelerator pulse frequency. This frequency is set for each “energy — dose rate” combination of the linear accelerator. For all combinations, the image acquisition parameters were systematically changed to determine their influence on the performances of the Varian aS500 EPID system. New parameters such as the maximum number of rows (MNR) and the number of pulses per frame (NPF) were introduced to explain portal image acquisition theory. Theoretical and experimental values of MNR and NPF were compared, and they were in good agreement. Other results showed that NRP had a major influence on detector saturation and dose per image. A rule of thumb was established to determine the optimum NRP value to be used. This practical application was illustrated by a clinical example in which the saturation of the aSi EPID was avoided by NRP optimization. Moreover, an additional study showed that image quality was relatively insensitive to this parameter. PACS numbers: 87.53.Oq; 87.59.Jq

[1]  A G Visser,et al.  Quality assurance using portal imaging: the accuracy of patient positioning in irradiation of breast cancer. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Catharine H Clark,et al.  The use of electronic portal imaging to verify patient position during intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivered by the dynamic MLC technique. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Michael G. Herman,et al.  Guide to clinical use of electronic portal imaging , 2000, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[4]  P. Munro,et al.  Clinical use of electronic portal imaging: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 58. , 2001, Medical physics.

[5]  J Yorkston,et al.  Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation. , 1997, Medical physics.

[6]  Tom Depuydt,et al.  The use of an aSi-based EPID for routine absolute dosimetric pre-treatment verification of dynamic IMRT fields. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  B G Fallone,et al.  Dosimetric IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  T. Frenzel,et al.  Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements. , 2004, Medical physics.

[9]  P. Manser,et al.  Introduction of a novel dose saving acquisition mode for the PortalVision aS500 EPID to facilitate on-line patient setup verification. , 2004, Medical physics.

[10]  L. Antonuk Electronic portal imaging devices: a review and historical perspective of contemporary technologies and research. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Technical aspects of daily online positioning of the prostate for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using an electronic portal imaging device. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  P. Munro,et al.  X-ray quantum limited portal imaging using amorphous silicon flat-panel arrays. , 1998, Medical physics.

[13]  K. Langmack Review article: Portal imaging , 2001 .

[14]  David L Wilson,et al.  Quantitative image quality evaluation of pixel-binning in a flat-panel detector for x-ray fluoroscopy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[15]  J. Kinsman,et al.  Portal imaging. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.