Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro.

Ultrasound (US)/microbubble-mediated gene delivery is a technology with many potential advantages suited to clinical application. Previous studies have demonstrated transfection but many are unsatisfactory in respect to the exposure apparatus, lack of definition of the US field or the limitations on parameters that can be explored using clinical diagnostic US machines. We investigated individual exposure parameters using a system minimising experimental artefacts and allowing control of many parameters of the US field. Using a 1-MHz transducer we systematically varied US parameters, the duration of exposure and the microbubble and DNA concentrations to optimise gene delivery. Delivery was achieved, using lipid microbubbles (SonoVue) and clinically acceptable US exposures, to adherent cells at efficiencies of approximately 4%. The acoustic pressure amplitude (0.25 MPa peak-negative), pulse repetition frequency (1-kHz) and duration of exposure (10 s) were important in optimising gene delivery with minimal impact on cell viability. These findings support the hypothesis that varying the physical parameters of US-mediated gene delivery has an affect on both efficiency and cell viability. These data are the first in terms of their thorough exploration of the US parameter space and will be the basis for more-informed approaches to developing clinical applications of this technology.

[1]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  J F Greenleaf,et al.  Artificial cavitation nuclei significantly enhance acoustically induced cell transfection. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  D. Crossman,et al.  Ultrasound-enhanced transgene expression in vascular cells is not dependent upon cavitation-induced free radicals. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Gene transfer with echo-enhanced contrast agents: comparison between Albunex, Optison, and Levovist in mice--initial results. , 2003, Radiology.

[5]  J. Gunn,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated delivery of TIMP-3 plasmid DNA into saphenous vein leads to increased lumen size in a porcine interposition graft model , 2005, Gene Therapy.

[6]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast-agent gas bodies. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Cristina Pislaru,et al.  Optimization of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer: comparison of contrast agents and ultrasound modalities. , 2003, European heart journal.

[8]  R. Shohet,et al.  DNA-loaded albumin microbubbles enhance ultrasound-mediated transfection in vitro. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  D. Crossman,et al.  Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for vascular gene delivery , 2000, Gene Therapy.

[11]  D. Wells,et al.  Gene Therapy Progress and Prospects: Electroporation and other physical methods , 2004, Gene Therapy.

[12]  G. Haar,et al.  High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Tumors , 2001, Echocardiography.

[13]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  DNA transfer and cell killing in epidermoid cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast agent gas bodies in vitro. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  D. Escande,et al.  Polyethylenimine but Not Cationic Lipids Promotes Transgene Delivery to the Nucleus in Mammalian Cells* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  T. Partridge,et al.  Microbubble ultrasound improves the efficiency of gene transduction in skeletal muscle in vivo with reduced tissue damage , 2003, Gene Therapy.

[16]  Raffi Bekeredjian,et al.  Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction Can Repeatedly Direct Highly Specific Plasmid Expression to the Heart , 2003, Circulation.

[17]  Le-ming Fan,et al.  Ultrasound/microbubble enhances foreign gene expression in ECV304 cells and murine myocardium. , 2004, Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica.

[18]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[19]  E. Unger,et al.  Gene Delivery Using Ultrasound Contrast Agents , 2001, Echocardiography.

[20]  K. Loeb,et al.  Ultrasound enhances gene delivery of human factor IX plasmid. , 2005, Human Gene Therapy.

[21]  B Zeqiri,et al.  A new anechoic material for medical ultrasonic applications. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  J F Greenleaf,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated transfection of mammalian cells. , 1996, Human gene therapy.

[23]  P. Hwu.  Gene therapy: progress and prospects. , 1994, Contemporary urology.

[24]  D. Cumberland,et al.  Ultrasound Gene Therapy: On the Road from Concept to Reality , 2001, Echocardiography.

[25]  M. Halliwell,et al.  Optimisation of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in skeletal muscle cells. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  D. Cumberland,et al.  Ultrasound enhances reporter gene expression after transfection of vascular cells in vitro. , 1999, Circulation.

[27]  D O Cosgrove,et al.  Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.