Experimental Evidence for the Truth Conditional Contribution and Shifting Information Status of Appositives

15 sentence in which they appear. Here, we address this question head-on experimentally. We first investigate the information status of appositives and find that while nominal appositives (e.g. a classical violinist) and sentence-medial appositive relative clauses (e.g. who is a classical violinist) are largely not at issue, sentence-final appositive relative clauses can become at issue, as witnessed in their becoming the target of a direct rejection and 20 being associated with subsequent questions. We then investigate the truth conditional contribution of appositives to sentences in which they appear, and find that whenever an appositive is false, participants judge the entire sentence False. Reaction times complement truth value ratings to demonstrate that this decision is largely automatic. We discuss possible reasons for the difference among appositive types and sentential

[1]  J. McCawley.  Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure , 1982 .

[2]  M. Simons.  Presupposition and Accommodation: Understanding the Stalnakerian Picture , 2003 .

[3]  Robert Rodman.  SCOPE PHENOMENA, “MOVEMENT TRANSFORMATIONS,” AND RELATIVE CLAUSES , 1976 .

[4]  Hamida Demirdache.  Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives and dislocation structures , 1991 .

[5]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Meaning and grammar (2nd ed.): an introduction to semantics , 2000 .

[6]  Satoshi Tomioka.  Why questions, presuppositions, and intervention effects , 2009 .

[7]  Nicole Dehé,et al.  Clausal parentheticals, intonational phrasing, and prosodic theory1 , 2009, Journal of Linguistics.

[8]  James D. McCawley,et al.  The syntactic phenomena of English , 1988 .

[9]  Judith Tonhauser,et al.  Diagnosing (not-)at-issue content , 2011 .

[10]  Peter F. Strawson,et al.  Introduction To Logical Theory , 1954 .

[11]  Ruth Kempson,et al.  Nonrestrictive Relatives and Growth of Logical Form , 2003 .

[12]  K. Bach.  The Myth of Conventional Implicature , 1999 .

[13]  ter Meulen,et al.  Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 5 , 2004 .

[14]  Peter Lasersohn,et al.  Existence Presuppositions and Background Knowledge , 1993, J. Semant..

[15]  Francesca Del Gobbo.  Appositives and Quantification , 2003 .

[16]  K. Fintel.  Would You Believe It? The King of France is Back! (Presuppositions and Truth-Value Intuitions) , 2001 .

[17]  Shalom Lappin,et al.  当代语义理论指南 = The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory , 2015 .

[18]  Todor Koev,et al.  On the Information Status of Appositive Relative Clauses , 2011, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[19]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and syntax , 1984 .

[20]  Napoleon Katsos,et al.  Experimental investigations of the typology of presupposition triggers , 2012 .

[21]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment , 1993, The Language of Time - A Reader.

[22]  M. Vries,et al.  The Syntax of Appositive Relativization: On Specifying Coordination, False Free Relatives, and Promotion , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[23]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[24]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  Crossing the Appositive/At-issue Meaning Boundary , 2010 .

[25]  Anne Bezuidenhout,et al.  Descriptions and Beyond , 2004 .

[26]  J. Dever.  Complex Demonstratives , 2001 .

[27]  Doug Arnold,et al.  Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans , 2007 .

[28]  Philippe Schlenker.  Supplements within a Unidimensional Semantics I: Scope , 2009, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[29]  K. Haas.  Wait a minute! , 1992, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[30]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  The major syntactic structures of English , 1973 .

[31]  P. Strawson.  Identifying reference and truth‐values , 2008 .

[32]  Kim B. Bruce,et al.  On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions , 2010, J. Semant..

[33]  Emmanuel Chemla,et al.  Processing presuppositions: Dynamic semantics vs pragmatic enrichment , 2013 .

[34]  P. Sells.  Restrictive and non-restrictive modification , 1985 .

[35]  Christopher Potts.  The logic of conventional implicatures , 2004 .

[36]  P. Strawson,et al.  Introduction to Logical Theory. , 1954 .

[37]  J. Hintikka.  On denoting what? , 2005, Synthese.

[38]  Ottojespersen.  A Modern English Grammar On Historical Principles Part Vi , 1954 .

[39]  R. Nouwen.  On appositives and dynamic binding , 2007 .

[40]  Richard S. Kayne.  The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[41]  Sarah E. Murray.  Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts , 2010 .

[42]  Robert Stalnaker,et al.  Presuppositions of Compound Sentences , 2008 .

[43]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Predicting perspectival orientation for appositives , 2009 .

[44]  Christopher Gauker.  What Is a Context of Utterance? , 1998 .

[45]  Sónia Frota,et al.  Comments on Intonational Phrasing in English , 2005 .

[46]  Christopher Potts.  The expressive dimension , 2007 .

[47]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy of Projective Content , 2013 .

[48]  G. Webbe,et al.  Any Questions , 1946, The Indian medical gazette.

[49]  G. Frege.  Über Sinn und Bedeutung , 1892 .

[50]  K. Fintel.  What is Presupposition Accommodation , 2000 .

[51]  E. Allyn Smith,et al.  Review of The Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts , 2007 .

[52]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[53]  Stanley Peters,et al.  Conventional Implicature. Syntax and Semantics, Volume 11, Presupposition , 1981 .

[54]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressives , 2009 .

[55]  P. Strawson.  III.—ON REFERRING , 1950 .

[56]  P. Berckmans.  Demonstration, apposition and direct reference , 1994 .

[57]  K. Safir.  Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels , 1986 .

[58]  Paul Portner,et al.  Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , 2011 .

[59]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics , 2012 .

[60]  Alexandra Cornilescu,et al.  Non-Restrictive Relative Clauses, An Essay in Semantic Description , 1981 .

[61]  L. T. F. Gamut.  Logic, language, and meaning , 1991 .

[62]  Ira A. Noveck,et al.  Children's enrichments of conjunctive sentences in context , 2009 .

[63]  Daniel Büring,et al.  On D-Trees, Beans, And B-Accents , 2003 .

[64]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Wait a minute! What kind of discourse strategy is this? (Annotated data set) , 2008 .

[65]  K. Turner,et al.  The Border Wars: A Neo-Gricean Perspective , 2006, Where Semantics meets Pragmatics.

[66]  J. Ginzburg.  Interrogatives: questions, facts and dialogue , 1996 .

[67]  B. Russell.  Essays in analysis , 1973 .

[68]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[69]  G. Cinque.  Two Types of Nonrestrictive Relatives , 2008 .

[70]  David I. Beaver,et al.  What projects and why , 2010 .

[71]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  See Blockindiscussions, Blockinstats, Blockinand Blockinauthor Blockinprofiles Blockinfor Blockinthis Blockinpublication the Blockinsyntax-discourse Blockindivide: Processing Blockinellipsis , 2022 .

[72]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics , 1990 .

[73]  Todor K. Koev,et al.  APPOSITION AND THE STRUCTURE OF DISCOURSE , 2013 .

[74]  Christopher Potts.  Conventional implicature and expressive content , 2008 .

[75]  Ha Pearson.  A modification of the "Hey, Wait a Minute" test , 2010 .

[76]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  From discourse to logic , 1993 .

[77]  Dmitri Tymoczko.  “Hey, Wait a Minute!” , 2012 .

[78]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic predicate logic , 1991 .

[79]  Steven E. Boër,et al.  The Myth of Semantic Presupposition , 1976 .