Multi-Objective Sensitivity Analysis of a Fully Distributed Hydrologic Model WetSpa

The application of fully distributed watershed models has the advantage of providing location-specific outputs. However, the calibration of these models is very challenging due to over-parameterization. A typical strategy is to aggregate parameters and screen out insensitive parameters in order to decrease the dimension of the problem for calibration. To ensure the validity of calibration, it is important to identify important physical processes and parameter interactions, and examine how different model setups affect model simulation. In this paper, a two-step multi-objective sensitivity analysis approach is applied to a distributed hydrologic model, the WetSpa (Water and Energy Transfer between Soil, Plant and Atmosphere), with case studies in the Chaohe Basin in China and the Margecany Basin in Slovakia respectively. This two-step global sensitivity analysis technique, incorporating the Morris method and the SDP (State Dependent Parameter) method, has proved to be effective in the two case studies. The results of two case studies show that (i) a warm-up period is essential for minimizing the impact of initial state variables to the model simulation, (ii) different objective functions lead to different sensitivity results, (iii) evapotranspiration is the most sensitive process to the model result in the two study watersheds followed by the groundwater and soil water process, and (iv) the sensitivity of snowmelt process is case dependent.

[1]  Okke Batelaan,et al.  Estimating the effects of climate change on groundwater recharge and baseflow in the upper Ssezibwa catchment, Uganda , 2009 .

[2]  A. Bahremand,et al.  WetSpa Model Application for Assessing Reforestation Impacts on Floods in Margecany–Hornad Watershed, Slovakia , 2007 .

[3]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[4]  A. Bahremand,et al.  Distributed Hydrological Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis in Torysa Watershed, Slovakia , 2008 .

[5]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Uncertainty , sensitivity analysis and the role of data based mechanistic modeling in hydrology , 2006 .

[6]  M. Beran,et al.  Hydrograph Prediction - How much skill? , 1999 .

[7]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations Revisited, Rebutted , 1982 .

[8]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Can global sensitivity analysis steer the implementation of models for environmental assessments and decision-making? , 2002 .

[9]  Alireza R. Safari,et al.  WetSpa model application in the Distributed Model Intercomparison Project (DMIP2) , 2012 .

[10]  A. Rao,et al.  Analysis of objective functions used in urban runoff models , 1987 .

[11]  L. Pfister,et al.  A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modeling , 2003 .

[12]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[13]  Abdolreza Bahremand,et al.  Predictive Analysis and Simulation Uncertainty of a Distributed Hydrological Model , 2010 .

[14]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[15]  Peter C. Young,et al.  State Dependent Parameter metamodelling and sensitivity analysis , 2007, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[16]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[17]  A. Saltelli,et al.  On the Relative Importance of Input Factors in Mathematical Models , 2002 .

[18]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[19]  H. Jia,et al.  Spatial and dynamic simulation for Miyun Reservoir waters in Beijing. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Calibration of watershed models , 2003 .

[21]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[22]  Jing Yang,et al.  Convergence and uncertainty analyses in Monte-Carlo based sensitivity analysis , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Developments in Time Series Analysis , 1993 .

[24]  P. Young,et al.  Time variable and state dependent modelling of non-stationary and nonlinear time series , 1993 .

[25]  F. De Smedt,et al.  Hydrological Modeling of Snow Accumulation and Melting on River Basin Scale , 2009 .

[26]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[27]  A. Bahremand,et al.  Application of a geographical information system (GIS) based hydrological model for flow prediction in Gorganrood river basin, Iran , 2011 .

[28]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[29]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Identification and Evaluation of Watershed Models , 2013 .

[30]  M. H. Diskin,et al.  A procedure for the selection of objective functions for hydrologic simulation models , 1977 .

[31]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Multiobjective Parameter Estimation For Hydrologic Models - Weighting Of Errors , 1991 .

[32]  P. Reichert,et al.  Hydrological modelling of the Chaohe Basin in China: Statistical model formulation and Bayesian inference , 2007 .

[33]  Mahyar Shafii,et al.  Multi-objective calibration of a distributed hydrological model (WetSpa) using a genetic algorithm , 2009 .

[34]  R. Freeze,et al.  Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response model , 1969 .

[35]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[36]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output , 1999 .