Evaluation of a lab-scale tidal flow constructed wetland performance: Oxygen transfer capacity, organic matter and ammonium removal

Abstract Oxygen transfer capacity and removal of ammonium and organic matter were investigated in this study to evaluate the performance of a lab-scale tidal flow constructed wetland. Average oxygen supply under tidal operation (350 g m −2  d −1 ) was much higher than in conventional constructed wetlands ( −2  d −1 ), resulting in enhanced removal of BOD 5 and NH 4 + . Theoretical oxygen demand from BOD 5 removal and nitrification was approximately matched by the measured oxygen supply, which indicated aerobic consumption of BOD 5 and NH 4 + under tidal operation. When BOD 5 removal increased from 148 g m −2  d −1 to 294 g m −2  d −1 , neither exhausted oxygen from the aggregate matrix during feeding period (111 g m −2  d −1 ) nor effluent dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration (2.8 mg/L) changed significantly, demonstrating that the oxygen transfer potential of the treatment system had not been exceeded. However, even though DO had not been exhausted, inhibition of nitrification was observed under high BOD loading. The loss of nitrification was attributed to excessive heterotrophic biofilm growth believed to induce oxygen transfer limitations or oxygen competition in thickened biofilms.

[1]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[2]  P. F. Cooper,et al.  Constructed wetlands in water pollution control. , 1990 .

[3]  Paul Knowles,et al.  Clogging in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands: Occurrence and contributing factors , 2011 .

[4]  J. J. Heijnen,et al.  The sequencing batch reactor as a powerful tool for the study of slowly growing anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms , 1998, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[5]  M. Wagner,et al.  Erratum to “Nitrifying and heterotrophic population dynamics in biofilm reactors: effects of hydraulic retention time and the presence of organic carbon”: [Water Research 36 (2002) 469–481] , 2003 .

[6]  S. Okabe,et al.  Spatial microbial distributions of nitrifiers and heterotrophs in mixed‐population biofilms , 1996, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  David Austin,et al.  Influence of cation exchange capacity (CEC) in a tidal flow, flood and drain wastewater treatment wetland , 2006 .

[8]  Peter Vanrolleghem,et al.  Impact of Prior Physico-Chemical Treatment on the Clogging Process of Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands: Model-Based Evaluation , 2007 .

[9]  Jan Vymazal,et al.  Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment , 2005, Encyclopedia of Ecology.

[10]  Graham B. McBride,et al.  Effect of water level fluctuation on nitrogen removal from constructed wetland mesocosms , 1999 .

[11]  A. J. Biddlestone,et al.  Treatment of agricultural wastewater in a combined tidal flow-downflow reed bed system , 1999 .

[12]  Jan Vymazal,et al.  Natural and constructed wetlands : nutrients, metals and management , 2005 .

[13]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[14]  Hans Brix,et al.  Use of constructed wetlands in water pollution control: historical development, present status, and future perspectives , 1994 .

[15]  Graham B. McBride,et al.  Modelling biofilm nitrogen transformations in constructed wetland mesocosms with fluctuating water levels. , 1999 .

[16]  Andreas Schwager,et al.  Transport phenomena in intermittent filters , 1997 .

[17]  Jaime Nivala,et al.  Energy requirements for nitrification and biological nitrogen removal in engineered wetlands , 2009 .

[18]  G. Parkin,et al.  Treatment of landfill leachate using an aerated, horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  Yongding Liu,et al.  Effect of limited artificial aeration on constructed wetland treatment of domestic wastewater , 2010 .

[20]  Yaqian Zhao,et al.  Enhanced removal of organic matter and ammoniacal-nitrogen in a column experiment of tidal flow constructed wetland system. , 2005, Journal of biotechnology.

[21]  Miklas Scholz,et al.  Nutrient Removal in Pilot-Scale Constructed Wetlands Treating Eutrophic River Water: Assessment of Plants, Intermittent Artificial Aeration and Polyhedron Hollow Polypropylene Balls , 2009 .

[22]  Hans Brix,et al.  Gas exchange through the soil-atmosphere interphase and through dead culms of phragmites australis in a constructed reed bed receiving domestic sewage , 1990 .

[23]  A. J. Biddlestone,et al.  Treatment of Agricultural and Domestic Effluents in Constructed Downflow Reed Beds Employing Recirculation , 1998 .

[24]  Hans Brix,et al.  How ‘green’ are aquaculture, constructed wetlands and conventional wastewater treatment systems? , 1999 .

[25]  J. Wood,et al.  Efficiency of reed beds in treating dairy wastewater , 2007 .

[26]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Structure and function of a nitrifying biofilm as determined by in situ hybridization and the use of microelectrodes , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[27]  Marc Strous,et al.  Key Physiology of Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[28]  Eric Lohan,et al.  NITRIFICATION AND DENITRIFICATION IN A TIDAL VERTICAL FLOW WETLAND PILOT , 2003 .

[29]  B. Davis,et al.  Damköhler number design method to avoid clogging of subsurface flow constructed wetlands by heterotrophic biofilms. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  Songming Zhu,et al.  Effects of organic carbon on nitrification rate in fixed film biofilters , 2001 .

[31]  D. Brown,et al.  Reciprocating constructed wetlands for treating industrial, municipal and agricultural wastewater. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[32]  R. Gersberg,et al.  Nutrient removal efficiency and resource economics of vertical flow and horizontal flow constructed wetlands , 2001 .

[33]  Design recommendations for subsurface flow constructed wetlands for nitrification and denitrification , 1999 .

[34]  J. G. Kuenen,et al.  The CANON system (Completely Autotrophic Nitrogen-removal Over Nitrite) under ammonium limitation: interaction and competition between three groups of bacteria. , 2001, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[35]  D McNevin,et al.  Indicators of biofilm development and activity in constructed wetlands microcosms. , 2004, Water research.

[36]  Stephen J. Allen,et al.  Generating “Tide” in Pilot‐Scale Constructed Wetlands to Enhance Agricultural Wastewater Treatment , 2006 .

[37]  Y Q Zhao,et al.  Optimising the performance of a lab-scale tidal flow reed bed system treating agricultural wastewater. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[38]  Maja Zupančič Justin,et al.  Combined purification and reuse of landfill leachate by constructed wetland and irrigation of grass and willows , 2009 .

[39]  Mark Smith,et al.  The design and performance of a nitrifying vertical-flow reed bed treatment system , 1997 .

[40]  Y Q Zhao,et al.  Purification capacity of a highly loaded laboratory scale tidal flow reed bed system with effluent recirculation. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[41]  Stephen E Mbuligwe,et al.  Comparative treatment of dye-rich wastewater in engineered wetland systems (EWSs) vegetated with different plants. , 2005, Water research.

[42]  C. Ouyang,et al.  Nutrient removal using a combined process with activated sludge and fixed biofilm , 1996 .

[43]  T. Sun,et al.  A potential new process for improving nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands—Promoting coexistence of partial-nitrification and ANAMMOX , 2007 .