How can we apply theories of habitat selection to wildlife conservation and management

Habitat-selection theory can be applied to solve numerous problems in the conservation and management of wildlife. Many of the solutions involve the use of habitat isodars, graphs of densities in pairs of habitats such that expected fitness is the same in both. For single species, isodars reflect differences in habitat quality, and specify the conditions when population density will, or will not, match the abundance of resources. When two or more species co-occur, isodars can be used to assess not only whether the species compete with one another, but also differences in habitat, in habitat selection, and in the functional form of density-dependent competition. Isodars have been applied to measure scales of habitat selection, the presence or absence of edge effects, as well as the number of habitats that species recognise in heterogeneous landscapes. Merged with foraging behaviour, isodars reveal the relative roles of habitat selection, spatial structure, and environmental stochasticity on local populations. Habitat-selection models can be linked similarly with theories of patch use to assess the underlying cause of source-sink dynamics. Isodars can detect and measure Allee effects, describe human habitat selection, and use human occupation of habitat as a leading indicator of threatened biodiversity. Even so, we have only begun to reveal the potential of habitat selection, and other optimal behaviours, to solve pressing problems in conservation and management.

[1]  Michael S. Gaines,et al.  Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: Implications for the evolution of fundamental niches , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[2]  M. Rosenzweig Loss of speciation rate will impoverish future diversity , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R. Macarthur,et al.  COMPETITION, HABITAT SELECTION, AND CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  D. Boag,et al.  Ducks nesting in association with gulls—an ecological trap? , 1972 .

[5]  E. Ranta,et al.  Size of environmental grain and resource matching , 2000 .

[6]  John A. Behnke,et al.  Challenging biological problems;: Directions toward their solution , 1974 .

[7]  M. McPeek,et al.  The Evolution of Dispersal in Spatially and Temporally Varying Environments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[8]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[9]  D. Morris Habitat selection in mosaic landscapes , 1995 .

[10]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Aggregation and the `ideal free ` distribution , 1983 .

[11]  J. Hutchings Collapse and recovery of marine fishes , 2000, Nature.

[12]  T. Caro,et al.  Behavioral ecology and conservation biology , 1998 .

[13]  The cost of interspecific competition in two gerbil species , 2001 .

[14]  Environmental networks, compensating life histories and habitat selection by white-footed mice , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[15]  Population Effects of Habitat Change: A Quantitative Assessment , 1988 .

[16]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  OPTIMALLY FORAGING MICE MATCH PATCH USE WITH HABITAT DIFFERENCES IN FITNESS , 2000 .

[17]  D. Morris Temporal and Spatial Population Dynamics among Patches Connected by Habitat Selection , 1996 .

[18]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  The Shape of a Gerbil Isocline Measured Using Principles of Optimal Habitat Selection , 1991 .

[19]  J. Reed The Role of Behavior in Recent Avian Extinctions and Endangerments , 1999 .

[20]  Joel s. Brown Ngongas and ecology: on having a worldview , 2001 .

[21]  Stuart L. Pimm,et al.  Competitors and habitat use , 1981 .

[22]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  MEASURING THE ALLEE EFFECT: POSITIVE DENSITY DEPENDENCE IN SMALL MAMMALS , 2002 .

[23]  C Bernstein,et al.  The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  T. A. Hanley,et al.  Habitat evaluation: do use/availability data reflect carrying capacity? , 1990 .

[25]  Tarja Oksanen,et al.  Exploitation ecosystems in heterogeneous habitat complexes , 1990, Evolutionary Ecology.

[26]  J. Ripa,et al.  Hamilton's rule confronts ideal free habitat selection , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[28]  C. Krebs,et al.  Measuring the ghost of competition: Insights from density-dependent habitat selection on the co-existence and dynamics of lemmings , 2000 .

[29]  R. Holt Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution , 1985 .

[30]  D. Morris Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure , 1988, Evolutionary Ecology.

[31]  How can maladaptive habitat choice generate source‐sink population dynamics? , 2000 .

[32]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Population Dynamics of Exploited Fish Stocks at Low Population Levels , 1995, Science.

[33]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes , 1995, Springer Netherlands.

[34]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  A Theory of Habitat Selection , 1981 .

[35]  O. Ovadia,et al.  Density-Dependent Habitat Selection: Evaluation of the Isodar Method , 1995 .

[36]  D. Morris Fitness and Patch Selection by White-Footed Mice , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[37]  M. McPeek,et al.  A general model of site‐dependent population regulation: population‐level regulation without individual‐level interactions , 2001 .

[38]  D. Morris Habitat matching: Alternatives and implications to populations and communities , 1994, Evolutionary Ecology.

[39]  B. V. Horne,et al.  DENSITY AS A MISLEADING INDICATOR OF HABITAT QUALITY , 1983 .

[40]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  Spatial scale and the cost of density-dependent habitat selection , 1987, Evolutionary Ecology.

[41]  R. Gomulkiewicz,et al.  How Does Immigration Influence Local Adaptation? A Reexamination of a Familiar Paradigm , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[42]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Habitat Selection: A Landscape Perspective on Population Dynamics , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[43]  D. Morris Coexistence of Specialist and Generalist Rodents Via Habitat Selection , 1996 .

[44]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  The Ecology of Fear: Optimal Foraging, Game Theory, and Trophic Interactions , 1999 .

[45]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  What Is the Allee Effect , 1999 .

[46]  Stephens,et al.  Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  TESTS OF DENSITY-DEPENDENT HABITAT SELECTION IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT' , 1987 .

[48]  P. K. Anderson ECOLOGICAL STRUCTURE AND GENE FLOW IN SMALL MAMMALS , 1970 .

[49]  R. Holt,et al.  Allee Effects, Invasion Pinning, and Species’ Borders , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[50]  J. S. Brown,et al.  Patch use under predation risks. I : Models and predictions , 1992 .

[51]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[52]  J. Diffendorfer Testing models of source-sink dynamics and balanced dispersal , 1998 .

[53]  Tom Tregenza,et al.  Building on the Ideal Free Distribution , 1995 .

[54]  D. Morris Has the ghost of competition passed , 1999 .

[55]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Extension of ideal free resource use to breeding populations and metapopulations , 2000 .

[56]  J. Wolff,et al.  Anderson, P. K. Dispersal in Rodents: a Resident Fitness Hypothesis. Special Publication, American Society of Mammalogists, 9: viii + 141. Price (hardbound) $29.95 , 1991 .

[57]  Marco A. Rodríguez,et al.  Habitat-specific estimates of competition in stream salmonids: A field test of the isodar model of habitat selection , 1995, Evolutionary Ecology.

[58]  E. Tuttle,et al.  Temporal resource variability and the habitat-matching rule , 1987, Evolutionary Ecology.

[59]  H. G. Cumming,et al.  Wildlife Ecology and Management , 1985 .

[60]  P. Paton,et al.  The Effect of Edge on Avian Nest Success : How Strong Is the Evidence ? , 2001 .

[61]  D. Boukal,et al.  Linking the Allee Effect, Sexual Reproduction, and Temperature‐Dependent Sex Determination Via Spatial Dynamics , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[62]  R. Fagen,et al.  A generalized habitat matching rule , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[63]  H. Kokko,et al.  Ecological traps in changing environments: Ecological and evolutionary consequences of a behaviourally mediated Allee effect , 2001 .

[64]  M. Holyoak,et al.  Habitat Patch Arrangement and Metapopulation Persistence of Predators and Prey , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[65]  Richard T. Holmes,et al.  SITE-DEPENDENT REGULATION OF POPULATION SIZE:A NEW SYNTHESIS , 1997 .

[66]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  The Effects of Habitat Geometry on Territorial Defense Costs: Intruder Pressure in Bounded Habitats , 1987 .

[67]  D. Morris,et al.  Habitat‐dependent competition and the coexistence of Australian heathland rodents , 2000 .

[68]  Burt P. Kotler Microhabitat Utilization in Desert Rodents: A Comparison of Two Methods of Measurement , 1985 .

[69]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Responses of a small mammal community to heterogeneity along forest-old-field edges , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[70]  Steven R. Kingston,et al.  Voles looking for an edge: habitat selection across forest ecotones , 2000 .

[71]  S. Fretwell Populations in a seasonal environment. , 1973, Monographs in population biology.

[72]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  The shape of a gerbil isocline: an experimental field study , 1992 .

[73]  E. Fernández-Juricic Density‐dependent habitat selection of corridors in a fragmented landscape , 2001 .

[74]  Robert D Holt,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[75]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Habitat Selection and Population Interactions: The Search for Mechanism , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[76]  D. Morris Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[77]  Veijo Kaitala,et al.  Resource matching with limited knowledge , 1999 .

[78]  D. Morris Density-dependent habitat selection: Testing the theory with fitness data , 1989, Evolutionary Ecology.

[79]  A. Subach,et al.  Safety in numbers: sophisticated vigilance by Allenby's gerbil. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[81]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinks , 1995 .

[82]  C. Huffaker Experimental studies on predation : dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations , 1958 .

[83]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[84]  Grenfell,et al.  Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[85]  M. Gyllenberg,et al.  Exploitation ecosystems in heterogeneous habitat complexes II: Impact of small-scale heterogeneity on predator-prey dynamics , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[86]  Pacific Southwest Forest,et al.  Wildlife 2000: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates , 1987 .

[87]  A. Subach,et al.  Gerbils under threat of owl predation: Isoclines and isodars , 1997 .

[88]  D. Morris,et al.  How Many Habitats do Landscapes Contain , 1996 .

[89]  L. W. Gysel,et al.  Avian Nest Dispersion and Fledging Success in Field‐Forest Ecotones , 1978 .

[90]  Optimally Foraging Deer Mice in Prairie Mosaics: A Test of Habitat Theory and Absence of Landscape Effects , 1997 .

[91]  A. Møller,et al.  Allee effect, sexual selection and demographic stochasticity , 2001 .

[92]  D. Morris,et al.  Density‐dependent foraging effort of Deer Mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) , 2001 .

[93]  R. Gray,et al.  Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution , 1993 .

[94]  P. K. Anderson Dispersal in rodents , 1989 .

[95]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  The shape of a Gerbillus pyramidum (Rodentia: Gerbillinae) isocline: An experimental field study , 1994 .

[96]  D. Morris A Haunting Legacy from Isoclines: Mammal Coexistence and the Ghost of Competition , 1999 .

[97]  D. Boughton Empirical evidence for complex source-sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfly metapopulation , 1999 .

[98]  A. Subach,et al.  Do gerbils care more about competition or predation , 1998 .

[99]  A. Gutierrez,et al.  IN POPULATION ECOLOGY , 1980 .

[100]  Predicting future threats to biodiversity from habitat selection by humans , 2002 .