Rules Versus Discretion: The Productivity Consequences of Flexible Regulation

Using data from electric utilities, this study shows that spending on well-designed regulations has a positive productivity impact but that spending on less well-designed regulations has a negative effect. Better-designed regulations are flexible and grant firms latitude on how to meet goals, allow them time to deploy new means to meet goals, and set ambitious goals that stretch them beyond current practices.

[1]  R. Percival.  Environmental Regulation: Law, Science, and Policy , 2003 .

[2]  Alfred Marcus,et al.  The dialectics of competency acquisition: Pollution prevention in electric generation , 1998 .

[3]  S. Majumdar.  On the utilization of resources: perspectives from the U.S. telecommunications industry , 1998 .

[4]  Sumit K. Majumdar,et al.  Incentive Regulation and Productive Efficiency in the U.S. Telecommunications Industry , 1997 .

[5]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING CHANGES IN STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[6]  Christine R. Vogan.  Pollution abatement and control expenditures , 1996 .

[7]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study , 1996, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[8]  P. Shrivastava.  The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability , 1995 .

[9]  S. Hart,et al.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[10]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Estimation and inference in econometrics , 1994 .

[11]  K. Salvanes,et al.  Productivity differences in multiple output industries: An empirical application to electricity distribution , 1994 .

[12]  G. Gellert,et al.  Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit , 1994 .

[13]  D. Kamerschen,et al.  Nuclear and Fossil Fuel Steam Generation of Electricity: Differences and Similarities* , 1993 .

[14]  John W. Mayo,et al.  The Measurement of Vertical Economies and the Efficient Structure of the Electric Utility Industry , 1991 .

[15]  R. Nelson.  On the Measurement of Capacity Utilization , 1989 .

[16]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Productivity Puzzles and R&D: Another Nonexplanation , 1988 .

[17]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  Implementing Externally Induced Innovations: A Comparison of Rule-Bound and Autonomous Approaches , 1988 .

[18]  P. Strebel.  Organizing for innovation over an industry cycle , 1987 .

[19]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest , 1986 .

[20]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Communication and Innovation Implementation , 1984 .

[21]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[22]  Louis T. Wells,et al.  Technology crossing borders , 1984 .

[23]  David R. Brodwin,et al.  Strategic implementation: Five approaches to an elusive phenomenon , 1984 .

[24]  N. Frohlich,et al.  Beyond Economic Man , 1984 .

[25]  Adam Rose,et al.  Modeling the macroeconomic impact of air-pollution abatement , 1983 .

[26]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-fueled Electric Power Generation , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  J. M. Beyer,et al.  Implementing Change: Alcoholism Policies in Work Organizations. , 1980 .

[28]  G. Yohe.  The backward incidence of pollution control--some comparative statics in general equilibrium , 1979 .

[29]  Robert D. Thomas.  Implementing Federal Programs at the Local Level , 1979 .

[30]  M. Jones-Lee,et al.  Beyond Economic Man. , 1977 .

[31]  R. Pethig.  Pollution, welfare, and environmental policy in the theory of Comparative Advantage , 1976 .

[32]  Carl E. Van Horn,et al.  The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework , 1975 .

[33]  M. Weitzman.  Prices vs. Quantities , 1974 .

[34]  W. Siffin.  Bureaucracy , 1971 .

[35]  H. Kelman.  PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGE , 1961 .

[36]  Margaret Hall,et al.  The Ambiguous Notion of Efficiency , 1959 .

[37]  I. Siegel,et al.  The Measurement of Capacity Utilization , 1942 .

[38]  Michael Schwarz,et al.  American Economic Association , 1891 .

[39]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[40]  Sumit K. Majumdar,et al.  Sluggish giants, sticky cultures, and dynamic capability transformation , 2000 .

[41]  P. Portney,et al.  Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U . S . Manufacturing : What Does the Evidence Tell Us ? , 1999 .

[42]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U , 1995 .

[43]  R. Bies,et al.  The Legalistic organization , 1994 .

[44]  A. Marcus.  Business & society: Ethics, government, and the world economy , 1993 .

[45]  G. Parkinson,et al.  Reducing wastes can be cost-effective , 1990 .

[46]  G. King,et al.  Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference , 1989 .

[47]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics , 1989 .

[48]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[49]  Wayne B. Gray,et al.  The Cost of Regulation: OSHA, EPA and the Productivity Slowdown , 1987 .

[50]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Communication and Innovation Implementation : Academy of Management Review , 1987 .

[51]  Louis T. Wells.  Economic man and engineering man : choice of technology in a low wage country , 1973 .

[52]  Lawrence R. Klein,et al.  The Measurement of Capacity , 1958 .