Perceptual segregation of a harmonic from a vowel by interaural time difference in conjunction with mistuning and onset asynchrony.

The two experiments reported here examine how an inter-aural time difference (ITD) interacts with two other cues, mistuning and onset asynchrony, in reducing the contribution of a single frequency component to the perception of a vowel's identity. Previous experiments have shown that although ITD is generally rather ineffective at segregating a simultaneous harmonic frequency component from a vowel, it can produce some segregation when listeners have already been exposed to the isolated segregated component. A difference in ITD increases segregation overall in experiment 1 where the to-be-segregated component can also have a different onset time from the remainder of the vowel, and experiment 2 shows a similar result when the to-be-segregated component is mistuned. However, segregation by ITD is present just as strongly on trials when there is neither mistuning nor a difference in onset-time as on trials where these additional cues are present. Segregation on trials when there is neither mistuning nor a difference in onset-time is however larger in the present experiment which mixed all conditions together than in similar trials in an earlier experiment that had a blocked design [C.J. Darwin and R.W. Hukin, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2316-2324 (1997)]. The results show that segregation by ITD increases when other more potent cues are present in the experiment.

[1]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[2]  C. Darwin Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: constraints on formant perception. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  R B Gardner,et al.  Mistuning a harmonic of a vowel: grouping and phase effects on vowel quality. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Lateralization of bands of noise: effects of bandwidth and differences of interaural time and phase. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R P Carlyon Detecting mistuning in the presence of synchronous and asynchronous interfering sounds. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  C. Darwin,et al.  Effect of coherent frequency modulation on grouping the harmonics of a vowel , 1994 .

[7]  J. Culling,et al.  Perceptual separation of concurrent speech sounds: absence of across-frequency grouping by common interaural delay. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Charles Darwin,et al.  Effects of contralateral presentation and of interaural time differences in segregating a harmonic from a vowel , 1995 .

[9]  C. Darwin,et al.  Lateralization of a perturbed harmonic: effects of onset asynchrony and mistuning. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  N. I. Hill,et al.  Profile analysis with an asynchronous target: evidence for auditory grouping. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. W. Hukin,et al.  Perceptual segregation of a harmonic from a vowel by interaural time difference and frequency proximity. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.