A Global Head Neck Torso Model for Whiplash Injury Criteria Investigation

The development of new protective systems must be performed on tools reliable and representative of alive human. In an earlier study, a simplified but realistic modeling of the head-neck-torso system under moderate rear impact was performed. This model of minimum complexity (MC-HNT model) but able to reproduce the 5 first experimental vibration modes was validated in the frequency domain in terms of natural frequencies and damping as well as mode shapes. The human model was then coupled to a car seat-head rest complex on Madymo Code in order to give real body behaviors and accurate T1 accelerations. The hypothesis of linear behavior was used for the torso being subjected to small deformations. The present study shows in detail the methodology carried out for real-world rear impact accident reconstruction in order to establish more accurate neck injury criteria as well as associated tolerance limits. In order to proceed to that, 87 accident cases were simulated using our MC-HNT human body model coupled to 3 Toyota seats under Madymo code. Several injury criteria, such as Neck Fx, Neck Fz, T1 acceleration, NICmax, Nkm and NDC, were calculated in order to correlate the risk of AIS1 neck injury using MCHNT. A similar work has then been done with the BioRID II model. Then a comparison between the predictive risk curves obtained by analyzing the MC-HNT model and the BioRID II model has been performed. This comparison was expressed in terms of Nagelkerke R-square values obtained with these analyses. It appears that the MC-HNT model gives a higher correlation than the BioRID II one for all parameter, and that the lower neck axial force is shown as the best candidate to correlate with the neck injury. The full text of this paper may be found at: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/esv/esv21/09-0412.pdf For the covering abstract see ITRD E145407.

[1]  D. Viano,et al.  Neck Displacements of Volunteers, BioRID P3 and Hybrid III in Rear Impacts: Implications to Whiplash Assessment by a Neck Displacement Criterion (NDC) , 2002 .

[2]  Priya Prasad,et al.  BIOFIDELITY OF ANTHROPOMORPHIC TEST DEVICES FOR REAR IMPACT , 1997 .

[3]  A Kullgren,et al.  Crash pulse recorder--validation in full scale crash tests. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  D. R. Cox,et al.  The analysis of binary data , 1971 .

[5]  J. Hess,et al.  Theoretical investigations of dynamic response of man to high vertical accelerations. , 1958, The Journal of aviation medicine.

[6]  Calyampudi Radhakrishna Rao,et al.  Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications , 1967 .

[7]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  CRASH PULSE RECORDER (CPR) - DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A LOW COST DEVICE FOR MEASURING CRASH PULSE AND DELTA-V IN REAL LIFE ACCIDENTS , 1991 .

[8]  R Fredriksson,et al.  Comparison of car seats in low speed rear-end impacts using the BioRID dummy and the new neck injury criterion (NIC). , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  F. N. David,et al.  LINEAR STATISTICAL INFERENCE AND ITS APPLICATION , 1967 .

[10]  A I King,et al.  Effects of bending on the vertebral column during +Gz acceleration. , 1970, Aerospace medicine.

[11]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination , 1991 .

[12]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Influence of Crash Severity on Various Whiplash Injury Symptoms: A Study Based on Real-Life Rear-End Crashes with Recorded Crash Pulses , 2005 .

[13]  H. Hansson,et al.  A NEW NECK INJURY CRITERION CANDIDATE-BASED ON INJURY FINDINGS IN THE CERVICAL SPINAL GANGLIA AFTER EXPERIMENTAL NECK EXTENSION TRAUMA , 1996 .

[14]  O. Boström,et al.  VALIDATION OF NECK INJURY CRITERIA USING RECONSTRUCTED REAL-LIFE REAR-END CRASHES WITH RECORDED CRASH PULSES , 2003 .

[15]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Influence of Seat Geometry and Seating Posture on NICmax Long-Term AIS 1 Neck Injury Predictability , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[16]  M. J. Wolanin,et al.  HYBRID III - A BIOMECHANICALLY-BASED CRASH TEST DUMMY , 1977 .

[17]  J B Welcher,et al.  Influence of Seat Foam and Geometrical Properties on BioRID P3 Kinematic Response to Rear Impacts , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[18]  David R. Cox The analysis of binary data , 1970 .

[19]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  Analysis of different head and neck responses in rear-end car collisions using a new humanlike mathematical model , 1994 .

[20]  Jac Wismans,et al.  Development and evaluation of a new rear-impact crash dummy: the RID2 , 2001 .

[21]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  A COMPARISON BETWEEN VOLUNTEER, BIORID P3 AND HYBRID III PERFORMANCE IN REAR IMPACTS , 1999 .

[22]  Anders Lie,et al.  Crash pulse recorder (CPR): validation in full scale crash tests , 1993 .

[23]  N. Bourdet,et al.  NEW METHOD FOR BIOFIDELITY EVALUATION OF DUMMY NECK , 2003 .

[24]  G. Siegmund,et al.  Kinetic and Kinematic Responses of the RID2a, Hybrid III and Human Volunteers in Low-Speed Rear-End Collisions. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[25]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Human Body-Car Seat Coupling Under Rear Impact , 2005 .

[26]  T. Szabo,et al.  Human Subject Kinematics and Electromyographic Activity During Low Speed Rear Impacts , 1996 .

[27]  Felix H. Walz,et al.  N km --A Proposal for a Neck Protection Criterion for Low-Speed Rear-End Impacts , 2002 .