Lidar Strip Adjustment with Automatically Reconstructed Roof Shapes

In recent years, the performance of lidar systems has steadily improved due to an increase in the achievable point density. The main error sources affecting the quality of lidar-derived secondary products such as digital terrain models (DTMs) and digital surface models (DSMs) are the result of systematic errors coming from insufficient boresight calibration. The effects of boresight misalignments are visually recognised as discrepancies of the laser point clouds at selected objects (such as building roofs) in overlapping areas of neighbouring lidar strips. In this work, a strip adjustment method is presented that corrects the systematic errors of the laser point cloud using five strip parameters (three shifts plus two angular corrections for heading and roll). The strip adjustment procedure uses 2D and 3D tie elements and takes advantage of a new 3D measurement technique applied to building roofs. The strip adjustment method is applied to three different datasets, consisting of conventional first/last pulse and full-waveform data. The results show that systematic discrepancies are typical for datasets that have already been processed by the flight companies. These errors can be reduced by more than 70% by applying the new strip adjustment approach. Preliminary investigations indicate that a higher laser point density and the inclusion of intensity and pulse width within full-waveform lidar data lead to better results.

[1]  Sagi Filin,et al.  Analysis and implementation of a laser strip adjustment model , 2003 .

[2]  T. Schenk,et al.  QUALITY CONTROL ISSUES OF AIRBORNE LASER RANGING DATA AND ACCURACY STUDY IN AN URBAN AREA , 2000 .

[3]  G. Vosselman,et al.  ADJUSTMENT AND FILTERING OF RAW LASER ALTIMETRY DATA , 2001 .

[4]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  A QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF REPEATED AIRBORNE LASER SCANNER OBSERVATIONS , 2004 .

[5]  George Vosselman,et al.  Analysis of planimetric accuracy of airborne laser scanning surveys , 2008 .

[6]  J. Reitberger,et al.  Analysis of full waveform LIDAR data for the classification of deciduous and coniferous trees , 2008 .

[7]  H. Maas Methods for measuring height and planimetry discrepancies in airborne laserscanner data , 2002 .

[8]  G. Vosselman ON THE ESTIMATION OF PLANIMETRIC OFFSETS IN LASER ALTIMETRY DATA , 2002 .

[9]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Automatic tie elements detection for laser scanner strip adjustment , 2005 .

[10]  Ana Paula Kersting,et al.  A strip adjustment procedure to mitigate the impact of inaccurate mounting parameters in parallel lidar strips , 2009 .

[11]  George Vosselman,et al.  Adjustment of airborne laser altimetry strips , 2004 .

[12]  PRECISE QUALITY CONTROL OF LIDAR STRIPS , 2009 .

[13]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  INVESTIGATING ADJUSTMENT OF AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING STRIPS WITHOUT USAGE OF GNSS/IMU TRAJECTORY DATA , 2009 .

[14]  A. F. Habib,et al.  LIDAR STRIP ADJUSTMENT USING CONJUGATE LINEAR FEATURES IN OVERLAPPING STRIPS , 2008 .

[15]  C. Tothc,et al.  AN APPROACH TO OPTIMIZE REFERENCE GROUND CONTROL REQUIREMENTS FOR ESTIMATING LIDAR / IMU BORESIGHT MISALIGNMENT , 2008 .