Generalisation between opposing visuomotor rotations when each is associated with visual targets and movements of different amplitude

Previous studies have attempted to identify sources of contextual information which can facilitate dual adaptation to two variants of a novel environment, which are normally prone to interference. The type of contextual information previously used can be grouped into two broad categories: that which is arbitrary to the motor system, such as a colour cue, and that which is based on an internal property of the motor system, such as a change in movement effector. The experiments reported here examined whether associating visuomotor rotations to visual targets and movements of different amplitude would serve as an appropriate source of contextual information to enable dual adaptation. The results indicated that visual target and movement amplitude is not a suitable source of contextual information to enable dual adaptation in our task. Interference was observed in groups who were exposed to opposing visuomotor rotations, or a visuomotor rotation and no rotation, both when the onset of the visuomotor rotations was sudden, or occurred gradually over the course of training. Furthermore, the pattern of interference indicated that the inability to dual adapt was a result of the generalisation of learning between the two visuomotor mappings associated with each of the visual target and movement amplitudes.

[1]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Generalization of Motor Learning Depends on the History of Prior Action , 2006, PLoS biology.

[2]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Concurrent adaptations of left and right arms to opposite visual distortions , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 1987, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  R. Shadmehr Generalization as a behavioral window to the neural mechanisms of learning internal models. , 2004, Human movement science.

[6]  P. Viviani,et al.  Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  O. Bock,et al.  Motor control prior to movement onset: preparatory mechanisms for pointing at visual targets , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Jinsung Wang,et al.  Adaptation to Visuomotor Rotations Remaps Movement Vectors, Not Final Positions , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  S. Riek,et al.  Dual adaptation to two opposing visuomotor rotations when each is associated with different regions of workspace , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Felice L. Bedford,et al.  Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions , 1989 .

[12]  Stephan Riek,et al.  Neuromuscular adaptation during skill acquisition on a two degree-of-freedom target-acquisition task: isometric torque production. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Learning to move amid uncertainty. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  M. Latash,et al.  Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of Visuomotor Transformations for Vectorial Planning of Reaching Trajectories , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Failure to Consolidate the Consolidation Theory of Learning for Sensorimotor Adaptation Tasks , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Ghez,et al.  Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  M. Kawato,et al.  Internal representations of the motor apparatus: implications from generalization in visuomotor learning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Simultaneous adaptation and switching for two viscous force fields , 2006 .

[22]  Martin Burghoff,et al.  Visuo-motor adaptation: evidence for a distributed amplitude control system , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  Y Burnod,et al.  Learning a new visuomotor transformation: error correction and generalization. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Quantifying Generalization from Trial-by-Trial Behavior of Adaptive Systems that Learn with Basis Functions: Theory and Experiments in Human Motor Control , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Stephan Riek,et al.  The interference effects of non-rotated versus counter-rotated trials in visuomotor adaptation , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  M. Kawato,et al.  Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Yasmin L. Hashambhoy,et al.  Neural Correlates of Reach Errors , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 1987, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  J. Ashe,et al.  Lack of adaptation to random conflicting force fields of variable magnitude. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  L Proteau,et al.  Determining movement onsets from temporal series. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[33]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[34]  H. Cunningham Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  R. C. Miall,et al.  Concurrent adaptation to opposing visual displacements during an alternating movement , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  J. Gordon,et al.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  M. Kawato,et al.  Explicit contextual information selectively contributes to predictive switching of internal models , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  R. Miall,et al.  Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  M. Kawato,et al.  A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.