Developments in Qualitative Solutions and Research (QSR software) from N3 through to NVivo have impacted not only on the convenience of using the program but also on the capacity of the researcher to undertake interpretive analysis. Perhaps reflective of changes in the broader context of social research, developments through succeeding generations of this software have also increased its capacity to contribute to integrated mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) analysis. New tools in the software have facilitated bringing quantitative (demographic, categorical and other numeric) data into a qualitative project, primarily to use for comparison of texts across subgroups. In addition, with N4 it has became possible to display tabulated data showing either the presence or absence of coding in particular documents or matrix displays (cross-tabulations) of grouped data. NVivo allows for both greater flexibility and greater specificity of quantitative output. Quantitative outputs from the qualitative database allow for graphical display or statistical manipulation of the data. Numeric output might be combined with existing statistical data to expand analytic possibilities. Interpretation of numeric data is supported throughout by the availability of the text on which such data are based, while patterns in the text can be elucidated through numeric displays. This ability to treat data both qualitatively and quantitatively, using software, can move mixed methods research beyond comparative, convergent or sequential designs toward truly integrated analysis.
[1]
Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.
Crafting mixed‐method evaluation designs
,
1997
.
[2]
Lois-ellin Datta,et al.
A pragmatic basis for mixed‐method designs
,
1997
.
[3]
T. Jick.
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
,
1979
.
[4]
Gretchen B. Rossman,et al.
Numbers and words revisited: Being “shamelessly eclectic”
,
1994
.
[5]
John W. Creswell,et al.
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
,
2010
.
[6]
Pat Bazeley,et al.
The Bricoleur with a Computer: Piecing Together Qualitative and Quantitative Data
,
1999
.
[7]
Sally Sieloff Magnan,et al.
Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
,
1997
.
[8]
Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.
Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed‐method evaluation
,
1997
.
[9]
M. Patton,et al.
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
,
1992
.
[10]
J M Morse,et al.
Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation.
,
1991,
Nursing research.
[11]
D L Morgan,et al.
Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research
,
1998,
Qualitative health research.