Adaptive, template moderated, spatially varying statistical classification

A novel image segmentation algorithm was developed to allow the automatic segmentation of both normal and abnormal anatomy from medical images. The new algorithm is a form of spatially varying statistical classification, in which an explicit anatomical template is used to moderate the segmentation obtained by statistical classification. The algorithm consists of an iterated sequence of spatially varying classification and nonlinear registration, which forms an adaptive, template moderated (ATM), spatially varying statistical classification (SVC). Classification methods and nonlinear registration methods are often complementary, both in the tasks where they succeed and in the tasks where they fail. By integrating these approaches the new algorithm avoids many of the disadvantages of each approach alone while exploiting the combination. The ATM SVC algorithm was applied to several segmentation problems, involving different image contrast mechanisms and different locations in the body. Segmentation and validation experiments were carried out for problems involving the quantification of normal anatomy (MRI of brains of neonates) and pathology of various types (MRI of patients with multiple sclerosis, MRI of patients with brain tumors, MRI of patients with damaged knee cartilage). In each case, the ATM SVC algorithm provided a better segmentation than statistical classification or elastic matching alone.

[1]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Laboratory Investigation:Automatic Identification of Gray Matter Structures from MRI to Improve the Segmentation of White Matter Lesions , 1995 .

[3]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Nonlinear anisotropic filtering of MRI data , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  R. Rabbitt,et al.  3D brain mapping using a deformable neuroanatomy. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[6]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Estimation by the nearest neighbor rule , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Three-dimensional segmentation of MR images of the head using probability and connectivity. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  R Kikinis,et al.  Automatic identification of gray matter structures from MRI to improve the segmentation of white matter lesions. , 1995, Journal of image guided surgery.

[9]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain development in premature and mature newborns , 1998, Annals of neurology.

[10]  R. L. Butterfield,et al.  Multispectral analysis of magnetic resonance images. , 1985, Radiology.

[11]  Gary J. Balas,et al.  Optical flow: a curve evolution approach , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[12]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  Simon Warfield,et al.  CORTICAL BRAIN DEVELOPMENT IN PRETERM AND FULLTERM INFANTS: SURFACE AND VOLUME CHANGES MEASURED BY 3D-MRI • 1733 , 1997, Pediatric Research.

[14]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of Brain Tissues and MR Bias Field Correction Using a Cigital Brain Atlas , 1998, MICCAI.

[15]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Nonlinear Registration and Template-Driven Segmentation , 1999 .

[16]  Joachim Dengler,et al.  THE DYNAMIC PYRAMID—A MODEL FOR MOTION ANALYSIS WITH CONTROLLED CONTINUITY , 1988 .

[17]  C J Taylor,et al.  The use of active shape models for making thickness measurements of articular cartilage from MR images , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  David Metcalf,et al.  A Digital Brain Atlas for Surgical Planning, Model-Driven Segmentation, and Teaching , 1996, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[19]  R. Kikinis,et al.  The evolution of multiple sclerosis lesions on serial MR. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Routine quantitative analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid spaces with MR imaging , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Gary J. Balas,et al.  Optical flow: a curve evolution approach , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[22]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Fast k-NN classification for multichannel image data , 1996, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[23]  R P Velthuizen,et al.  MRI: stability of three supervised segmentation techniques. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Multiresolution elastic matching , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[25]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  A High Performance Computing Approach to the Registration of Medical Imaging Data , 1998, Parallel Comput..

[26]  Forest Baskett,et al.  An Algorithm for Finding Nearest Neighbors , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[27]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data , 1995, CVRMed.

[28]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Model-based 3-D segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in dual-echo MRI data , 1992, Other Conferences.