Shear Rate Effects on the Post-peak Shear Behaviour and Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Artificially Split Granite Joints

Rock joints may be sheared at different rates under quasi-static or dynamic loading. Understanding the mechanical response of rock joints at different shear rates is of great importance for the mitigation of dynamic geo-hazards such as earthquakes, fault slip rockbursts and landslides. In this study, direct shear tests at various shear rates (0.001–0.1 mm/s) under different normal stresses (3–40 MPa) are conducted on split granite joints, and the influences of shear rates on the shear strength, post-peak shear behaviour and acoustic emission (AE) characteristics are analysed and discussed. The research findings suggest that both peak and residual shear strengths tend to decrease with increasing shear rate. Stick–slip occurs on all the joints, during which stress drop values increase with increasing shear displacement and normal stress. The stress drop magnitudes during stick–slip decrease with shear rate, while the time intervals between stress drops during stick–slip increase with shear rate. Further, the energy rate tends to increase while the AE events decrease with increasing shear rate, which is caused by the time-dependent deformation behaviour. The AE b value decreases linearly with the shear rate on a logarithmic scale, and the influence is more significant under high normal stress conditions. The variations in the b value can reflect the evolution process (first loading at lower and then higher shear rates) of dynamic geo-hazards and can be used as an effective indicator to predict the dynamic shear failure of granite joints in a temporal sequence. The results of this study will encourage better understanding of the rate-dependent shear behaviour of rough granite joints, particularly under high normal stress, and will provide some references for the monitoring and prediction of dynamic geo-hazards with respect to the AE (or micro-seismic) technique.

[1]  Mahdi Moosavi,et al.  The Influence of Shearing Velocity on Shear Behavior of Artificial Joints , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[2]  Danijel Schorlemmer,et al.  Acoustic emissions document stress changes over many seismic cycles in stick‐slip experiments , 2013 .

[3]  Giovanni Grasselli,et al.  ISRM Suggested Method for Laboratory Determination of the Shear Strength of Rock Joints: Revised Version , 2013, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[4]  H. Schneider Influence of machine stiffness and shear rate on the friction behaviour of rock joints , 1975 .

[5]  Chang-Woo Hong,et al.  Influence of Shear Load on the Characteristics of Acoustic Emission of Rock-Concrete Interface , 2004 .

[6]  A. M. Crawford Rate-dependent behaviour of rock joints : Ph D thesis, Dept of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 1980, 194P , 1981 .

[7]  D. Cruden,et al.  ESTIMATING JOINT ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS , 1979 .

[8]  Louis Ngai Yuen Wong,et al.  Influences of Normal Loading Rate and Shear Velocity on the Shear Behavior of Artificial Rock Joints , 2016, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[9]  Xia-Ting Feng,et al.  Reverse modelling of natural rock joints using 3D scanning and 3D printing , 2016 .

[10]  Gang Wang,et al.  Rate-dependent mechanical behavior of rough rock joints , 2016 .

[11]  Shaojun Li,et al.  Characteristics of Asperity Damage and Its Influence on the Shear Behavior of Granite Joints , 2018, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[12]  Liu Bo STUDY ON STRENGTH BEHAVIORS OF ROCK JOINTS UNDER DIFFERENT SHEARING DEFORMATION VELOCITIES , 2006 .

[13]  C. Scholz The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes , 1968 .

[14]  Kun Lin,et al.  Effects of shear rate on cyclic behavior of dry stack masonry joint , 2017 .

[15]  J. H. Curran,et al.  The influence of shear velocity on the frictional resistance of rock discontinuities , 1981 .

[16]  M. Wyss,et al.  Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes , 2005, Nature.

[17]  Hui Zhou,et al.  Investigation of the acoustic emission characteristics of artificial saw-tooth joints under shearing condition , 2016 .

[18]  Hui Zhou,et al.  Shear Behaviour and Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Different Joints Under Various Stress Levels , 2016, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[19]  Shaojun Li,et al.  Experimental study on the prediction of rockburst hazards induced by dynamic structural plane shearing in deeply buried hard rock tunnels , 2016 .

[20]  Ali Mirzaghorbanali,et al.  Effects of Shear Rate on Cyclic Loading Shear Behaviour of Rock Joints Under Constant Normal Stiffness Conditions , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[21]  B. Gutenberg,et al.  Frequency of Earthquakes in California , 1944, Nature.

[22]  A. Ghazvinian,et al.  Brittleness Effect on Rock Fatigue Damage Evolution , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[23]  Shaojun Li,et al.  Influences of Shear History and Infilling on the Mechanical Characteristics and Acoustic Emissions of Joints , 2017, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[24]  BallivyG.,et al.  Application of acoustic emission for monitoring shear behavior of bonded concrete–rock joints under direct shear test , 2012 .

[25]  J. Curran,et al.  The influence of rate- and displacement-dependent shear resistance on the response of rock slopes to seismic loads , 1982 .

[26]  Michael Forde,et al.  Assessing Damage of Reinforced Concrete Beam using b -value Analysis of Acoustic Emission Signals , 2003 .

[27]  Chung-In Lee,et al.  Effect of boundary conditions on shear behaviour of rock joints around tunnel , 2006 .

[28]  L. Wong,et al.  Comparative study on dynamic shear behavior and failure mechanism of two types of granite joint , 2018, Engineering Geology.

[29]  J. Curran,et al.  Rate-dependent Behaviour of Rock Joints Black Quartz Syenite , 1981 .

[30]  Gérard Ballivy,et al.  Evaluating damage during shear tests of rock joints using acoustic emissions , 2010 .

[31]  P. Rivard,et al.  Correlating acoustic emission sources with damaged zones during direct shear test of rock joints , 2012 .

[32]  T. Ishida,et al.  Source distribution of acoustic emissions during an in-situ direct shear test: Implications for an analog model of seismogenic faulting in an inhomogeneous rock mass , 2010 .

[33]  H. Schneider The time dependence of friction of rock joints , 1977 .

[34]  D. Deb,et al.  LABORATORY MODELLING OF ROCK JOINTS UNDER SHEAR AND CONSTANT NORMAL LOADING , 2014 .