Wit and humor in discourse processing

Humor and wit are complex cognitive, social, and linguistic phenomena that are relevant to research in text comprehension, pragmatics, and discourse processing. We begin by presenting a taxonomy of jokes and wit as a useful, descriptive tool. Next, we argue that humor processing may occur in a parallel rather than serial fashion by contrasting a serial‐processing, incongruity‐resolution model with an alternative dual‐processing model. We subsequently endorse a theory of speech acts as a theoretical framework for the consideration of wit in discourse processing. Specifically, we argue that detailed analytical theories such as Allen's (1983) are needed to clarify the semantic and computational foundations of humor and wit. We present a taxonomy of the social functions of wit and argue that the consideration of wit as a plan for the fulfillment of social and discourse goals will enrich our theories of conversation.

[1]  RAYMOND W. GIBBS,et al.  Literal Meaning and Psychological Theory , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  R R Sokal,et al.  Classification: Purposes, Principles, Progress, Prospects , 1974, Science.

[3]  J. Suls.  Chapter 4 – A Two-Stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons: An Information-Processing Analysis , 1972 .

[4]  Bertram C. Bruce.  Plans and Social Actions , 1977 .

[5]  Robert R. Hoffman,et al.  Cognition and Figurative Language , 1980 .

[6]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Metaphor and Thought , 1980 .

[7]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  On the pretense theory of irony. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  M. Rothbart.  Psychological Approaches to the Study of Humour1 , 1977 .

[9]  H. H. Clark.  Responding to indirect speech acts , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  John J. La Gaipa.  The Effects of Humour on the Flow of Social Conversation1 , 1977 .

[11]  Paul E. McGhee,et al.  Children's Appreciation of Humor: A Test of the Cognitive Congruency Principle. , 1976 .

[12]  F. W. Wicker,et al.  Disparagement humor: Dispositions and resolutions. , 1980 .

[13]  T. Shultz.  A Cognitive-Developmental Analysis of Humour , 1976 .

[14]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Structures and Procedures of Implicit Knowledge , 1985 .

[15]  M. Brady,et al.  Recognizing Intentions From Natural Language Utterances , 1983 .

[16]  W. Martineau,et al.  Chapter 5 – A Model of the Social Functions of Humor , 1972 .

[17]  C. Raymond Perrault,et al.  Elements of a Plan-Based Theory of Speech Acts , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  Planning English Referring Expressions , 1985, Artif. Intell..

[19]  Victor Raskin,et al.  Semantic mechanisms of humor , 1984 .

[20]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Arousal and Reinforcement , 1967 .

[21]  P. Gildea,et al.  On understanding metaphor: the role of context , 1983 .

[22]  Karen O'Quin,et al.  Humor as a technique of social influence. , 1981 .

[23]  Thomas R. Shultz,et al.  The role of incongruity and resolution in children's appreciation of cartoon humor , 1972 .

[24]  George A. Miller,et al.  Test of the Mention Theory of Irony , 1984 .