P13.08: Assessment of changes in volume and vascularity of the ovaries during the normal menstrual cycle using three‐dimensional power Doppler ultrasound

BACKGROUND Our aim was to describe changes in the volume and vascularization of both ovaries, the dominant follicle and the corpus luteum during the normal menstrual cycle using three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler ultrasound. METHODS Fourteen healthy volunteers underwent serial transvaginal 3D ultrasound examinations of both ovaries on cycle day 2, 3 or 4, then daily from cycle day 9 until follicular rupture and 1, 2, 5, 7 and 12 days after follicular rupture. The volume and vascular indices of the ovaries, the dominant follicle and the corpus luteum were calculated off-line using virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) software. RESULTS The volume of the dominant ovary increased during the follicular phase, decreased after follicular rupture and then increased again during the luteal phase. Vascular indices in the dominant ovary and the dominant follicle/corpus luteum increased during the follicular phase, the vascular flow index (VFI) in the dominant follicle being on average (median) 1.7 times higher on the day before ovulation than 4 days before ovulation (P=0.003). The vascular indices continued to rise after follicular rupture so that VFI in the corpus luteum was on average (median) 3.1 times higher 7 days after ovulation than in the follicle on the day before ovulation (P=0.0002). The volume and vascular indices in the non-dominant ovary manifested no unequivocal changes during the menstrual cycle. CONCLUSIONS Substantial changes occur in volume and vascularization of the dominant ovary during the normal menstrual cycle. 3D power Doppler ultrasound may become a useful tool for assessing pathological changes in the ovaries, for example, in subfertile patients.

[1]  N. Raine-Fenning,et al.  The interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional power Doppler data acquisition within the female pelvis , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  N. Raine-Fenning,et al.  The interobserver reliability of ovarian volume measurement is improved with three-dimensional ultrasound, but dependent upon technique. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  N. Raine-Fenning,et al.  The reliability of virtual organ computer‐aided analysis (VOCAL) for the semiquantification of ovarian, endometrial and subendometrial perfusion , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  D. Zazula,et al.  Measurement of perifollicular blood flow of the dominant preovulatory follicle using three‐dimensional power Doppler , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  M. Hammadeh,et al.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional ultrasound measurement of follicular volume: are they comparable? , 2003, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[6]  S. Campbell,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver variability of ovarian volume, gray‐scale and color flow indices obtained using transvaginal three‐dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  S. Campbell,et al.  Side of ovulation and its effects on uterine and ovarian stromal blood flow and reproductive hormones. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  S. Campbell,et al.  Three‐dimensional sonographic and power Doppler characterization of ovaries in late follicular phase , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  M. Wu,et al.  Ovarian stroma flow intensity decreases by age: a three-dimensional power doppler ultrasonographic study. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Regulation and action of angiogenic factors in the primate ovary. , 2001, Archives of medical research.

[11]  N. Pugh,et al.  Perifollicular vascularity as a potential variable affecting outcome in stimulated intrauterine insemination treatment cycles: a study using transvaginal power Doppler. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[12]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Angiogenesis in ovarian follicular and luteal development. , 2000, Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[13]  R. Jaffe,et al.  Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian physiology and pathology. , 2000, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  H. Pairleitner,et al.  Three‐dimensional power Doppler sonography: imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularization , 1999, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  C. Coulam,et al.  Colour Doppler indices of follicular blood flow as predictors of pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[16]  C. Reymundo,et al.  A quantitative study of changes in the human corpus luteum microvasculature during the menstrual cycle. , 1999, Biology of reproduction.

[17]  L. Nelson,et al.  Human follicle fluid vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations are correlated with luteinization in spontaneously developing follicles. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[18]  Takashi Suzuki,et al.  Cyclic changes of vasculature and vascular phenotypes in normal human ovaries. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[19]  Blood Flow Changes in the Ovarian and Uterine Arteries During the Normal Menstrual Cycle , 1997 .

[20]  S. Campbell,et al.  Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound: reproducibility of ovarian and endometrial volume measurements. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  W P Collins,et al.  Ultrasound derived indices of follicular blood flow before HCG administration and the prediction of oocyte recovery and preimplantation embryo quality. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[22]  T. Bourne,et al.  Ultrasound studies of vascular and morphological changes in the human corpus luteum during the menstrual cycle. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[23]  L. Valentin,et al.  Uteroplacental and luteal circulation in normal first-trimester pregnancies: Doppler ultrasonographic and morphologic study. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  F. Bonilla-musoles,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses. , 1995, Gynecologic oncology.

[25]  R. Pierson,et al.  Characteristics of follicular evacuation during human ovulation , 1994, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[26]  L. Wide,et al.  Ultrasonographical and hormonal description of the normal ovulatory menstrual cycle , 1994, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[27]  L. Valentin,et al.  Blood Flow Velocity in the Uterine and Ovarian Arteries During Menstruation , 1994, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[28]  L. Valentin,et al.  Blood flow velocity in the uterine and ovarian arteries during the normal menstrual cycle , 1993, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[29]  W. Hop,et al.  Uterine and ovarian flow velocity waveforms in the normal menstrual cycle: a transvaginal Doppler study. , 1989, Fertility and sterility.

[30]  W. G. Ritchie Sonographic evaluation of normal and induced ovulation. , 1986, Radiology.

[31]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[32]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  M. Wu,et al.  Quantification of Doppler signal in polycystic ovary syndrome using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography: a possible new marker for diagnosis. , 2002, Human reproduction.

[34]  L. Solbiati,et al.  Power Doppler sonography: general principles, clinical applications, and future prospects , 1998, European Radiology.