Does b1000–b0 Mismatch Challenge Diffusion-Weighted Imaging–Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch in Stroke?

Background and Purpose— Our aim was to explore whether the mismatch in lesion visibility between b1000 and b0 images is an alternative to mismatch between diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging as a surrogate marker of stroke age. Methods— We analyzed patients from the European multicenter I-KNOW database. Independent readers assessed the visibility of ischemic lesions of the anterior circulation on b0 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging images. The signal-intensity ratio for b0 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging images was also measured from the segmented stroke lesion volume on b1000 images. Results— This study included 112 patients (68 men; mean age, 67.4 years) with stroke onset within (n=85) or longer than (n=27) 4.5 hours. b1000–b0 mismatch identified patients within 4.5 hours of stroke onset with moderate sensitivity (72.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 63.5–82.4) and specificity (70.4%; 95% CI, 53.2–87.6), high positive predictive value (88.6%; 95% CI, 81.1–96.0), and low negative predictive value (45.2%; 95% CI, 30.2–60.3). Global comparison of b1000–b0 mismatch with diffusion-weighted imaging–fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging mismatch (considered the imaging gold standard) indicated high sensitivity (85.9%; 95% CI, 78.2–93.6), specificity (91.2%; 95% CI, 76.3–98.1), and positive predictive value (96.7%; 95% CI, 88.0–99.1) and moderate negative predictive value (73.8%; 95% CI, 60.5–87.1) of this new approach. b0 signal-intensity ratio (r=0.251; 95% CI, 0.069–0.417; P=0.008) was significantly although weakly correlated with delay between stroke onset and magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusions— b1000–b0 mismatch may identify patients with ischemic stroke of the within 4.5 hours of onset with high positive predictive value, perhaps constituting an alternative imaging tissue clock.

[1]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  Color-Coded Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Images Improve Inter-Rater Reliability of Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Signal Changes Within Acute Diffusion-Weighted Image Lesions , 2014, Stroke.

[2]  P. Dupont,et al.  Wake-Up Stroke and Stroke of Unknown Onset: A Critical Review , 2014, Front. Neurol..

[3]  Ivana Galinovic,et al.  A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Test Efficacy and Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-up Stroke (WAKE-UP) , 2014, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[4]  S. Pedraza,et al.  Visual and Region of Interest–Based Inter-Rater Agreement in the Assessment of the Diffusion-Weighted Imaging– Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch , 2014, Stroke.

[5]  J. Fiebach,et al.  DWI Intensity Values Predict FLAIR Lesions in Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Bastian Cheng,et al.  Quantitative Measurements of Relative Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) Signal Intensities in Acute Stroke for the Prediction of Time from Symptom Onset , 2013, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[7]  CatherineOppenheim,et al.  Can Diffusion-Weighted Imaging–Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch (Positive Diffusion-Weighted Imaging/Negative Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery) at 3 Tesla Identify Patients With Stroke at <4.5 Hours? , 2013 .

[8]  M. Luby,et al.  A Pragmatic Approach Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Treat Ischemic Strokes of Unknown Onset Time in a Thrombolytic Trial , 2012, Stroke.

[9]  Ivana Galinovic,et al.  DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study , 2011, The Lancet Neurology.

[10]  C. Oppenheim,et al.  MR imaging helps predict time from symptom onset in patients with acute stroke: implications for patients with unknown onset time. , 2010, Radiology.

[11]  M. Endres,et al.  Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Evolution Within 12 Hours From Stroke Onset: A Reliable Tissue Clock? , 2010, Stroke.

[12]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Negative fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery imaging identifies acute ischemic stroke at 3 hours or less , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[13]  Kim Mouridsen,et al.  Quantitative t2 values predict time from symptom onset in acute stroke patients. , 2009, Stroke.

[14]  M. Kaste,et al.  Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  O Almkvist,et al.  Visual Rating of Age-Related White Matter Changes on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Scale Comparison, Interrater Agreement, and Correlations With Quantitative Measurements , 2003, Stroke.