Human Detection and Discrimination of Tactile Repeatability, Mechanical Backlash, and Temporal Delay in a Combined Tactile-Kinesthetic Haptic Display System

Many of the devices used in haptics research are over-engineered for the task and are designed with capabilities that go far beyond human perception levels. Designing devices that more closely match the limits of human perception will make them smaller, less expensive, and more useful. However, many device-centric perception thresholds have yet to be evaluated. To this end, three experiments were conducted, using one degree-of-freedom contact location feedback device in combination with a kinesthetic display, to provide a more explicit set of specifications for similar tactile-kinesthetic haptic devices. The first of these experiments evaluated the ability of humans to repeatedly localize tactile cues across the fingerpad. Subjects could localize cues to within 1.3 mm and showed bias toward the center of the fingerpad. The second experiment evaluated the minimum perceptible difference of backlash at the tactile element. Subjects were able to discriminate device backlash in excess of 0.46 mm on low-curvature models and 0.93 mm on high-curvature models. The last experiment evaluated the minimum perceptible difference of system delay between user action and device reaction. Subjects were able to discriminate delays in excess of 61 ms. The results from these studies can serve as the maximum (i.e., most demanding) device specifications for most tactile-kinesthetic haptic systems.

[1]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Manual discrimination and identification of length by the finger-span method , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Martin Buss,et al.  Integration of Kinesthetic and Tactile Display: A Modular Design Concept , 2006 .

[4]  T. L. Brooks,et al.  Telerobotic response requirements , 1990, 1990 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings.

[5]  Antonio Frisoli,et al.  A Fingertip Haptic Display for Improving Curvature Discrimination , 2008, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[6]  Durand R. Begault,et al.  Sensitivity to haptic-audio asynchrony , 2003, ICMI '03.

[7]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Deriving haptic design guidelines from human physiological, psychophysical, and neurological foundations , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[8]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Claudio Pacchierotti,et al.  A three DoFs wearable tactile display for exploration and manipulation of virtual objects , 2012, 2012 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS).

[10]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Remote Manipulative Control with Transmission Delay , 1963 .

[11]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Trajectory of contact region on the fingerpad gives the illusion of haptic shape , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Human Psychophysics for Teletaction System Design , 2000 .

[13]  Lynette A. Jones,et al.  Tactile Displays: Guidance for Their Design and Application , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Antonio Frisoli,et al.  Evaluation of Multipoint Contact Interfaces in Haptic Perception of Shapes , 2005, Multi-point Interaction with Real and Virtual Objects.

[15]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  What you can't feel won't hurt you: Evaluating haptic hardware using a haptic contrast sensitivity function , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[16]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  A novel two-dimensional tactile slip display: design, kinematics and perceptual experiments , 2005, TAP.

[17]  J M Loomis,et al.  An investigation of tactile hyperacuity. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[18]  Caroline Jay,et al.  Delayed visual and haptic feedback in a reciprocal tapping task , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[19]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Contact Location Display for Haptic Perception of Curvature and Object Motion , 2005, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[20]  William R. Provancher,et al.  Perception of Direction for Applied Tangential Skin Displacement: Effects of Speed, Displacement, and Repetition , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[21]  K O Johnson,et al.  The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans , 1994, Neurology.

[22]  Martin Buss,et al.  First evaluation of a novel tactile display exerting shear force via lateral displacement , 2005, TAP.

[23]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  An experiment on tracking surface features with the sensation of slip , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[24]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Extracting object properties through haptic exploration. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[25]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Force and Contact Location Shading Methods for Use Within Two- and Three-Dimensional Polygonal Environments , 2011, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[26]  Hiroo Iwata,et al.  Haptic interfaces , 2002 .

[27]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Perceptual sensitivity to head tracking latency in virtual environments with varying degrees of scene complexity , 2004, APGV '04.

[28]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A High Performance Tactile Feedback Display and Its Integration in Teleoperation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[29]  J. Loomis,et al.  Sensitivity to shifts of a point stimulus: An instance of tactile hyperacuity , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.