Information systems development as situated socio-technical change: a process approach

We outline a process approach for conducting qualitative research on how contemporary information systems (IS) development is enacted in practice. The approach involves a longitudinal case study to obtain rich data from which a detailed process narrative is produced. The narrative is informed by a conceptual model of IS development as situated socio-technical change, generating a theoretical explanation that highlights the temporal, emergent and contingent nature of IS development. This approach extends prior process studies of IS development by focusing on micro-level project activities, examining change as a continuous process and theorising IS change as the outcome of a dynamic trajectory of situated and socio-technical interactions. The methodological approach developed here can be used by other researchers to inform process studies of this complex organisational phenomenon.

[1]  Libby Hemphill,et al.  Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions, 2nd ed , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Broadband and mobile opportunities: a socio-technical perspective , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Simon M. Kaplan,et al.  The co-evolutionary dynamics of IS engagement , 2006, ECIS.

[4]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[5]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Traditional, iterative, and component-based development: A social analysis of software development paradigms , 2001, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[6]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Towards a process model of information systems implementation: the case of customer relationship management (CRM) , 2006, DATB.

[7]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Sequential patterns in information systems development: an application of a social process model , 1996, TOIS.

[8]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..

[9]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[10]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[11]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change , 2005 .

[12]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Technologies, Texts and Affordances , 2001 .

[13]  A. Pettigrew.  WHAT IS A PROCESSUAL ANALYSIS. , 1997 .

[14]  GassonSusan.  A social action model of situated information systems design , 1999 .

[15]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  A market-based perspective on information systems development , 2001, CACM.

[16]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research , 2001 .

[17]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Shaping of Social Organization: Social Rule System Theory with Applications , 1987 .

[18]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[19]  A. Whittle.  Preaching and practising ‘flexibility’: Implications for theories of subjectivity at work , 2005 .

[20]  L. Suchman.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). , 2007 .

[21]  John F. Rockart,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR CORPORATE STRATEGY , 2022 .

[22]  F. Geels.  From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[23]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[24]  Stephen G. MacDonell,et al.  Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes: A survey of research , 2011, CSUR.

[25]  Susan Gasson,et al.  A genealogical study of boundary-spanning IS design , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Michael Newman,et al.  The social dynamics of software development , 2000 .

[28]  A. Stinchcombe.  Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[29]  B. Pentland.  Building Process Theory with Narrative: from Description to Explanation , 1999 .

[30]  C. Ciborra,et al.  Formative contexts and information technology: Understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations , 1994 .

[31]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Persistent problems and practices in information systems development , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[32]  Michael Newman,et al.  User Involvement as an Interaction Process: A Case Study , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  A. Pettigrew.  Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[34]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Contextual influences on technology use mediation: a comparative analysis of electronic medical record systems , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  A framework for understanding how a unique and local IS development method emerges in practice , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Susan Gasson,et al.  A social action model of situated information systems design , 1999, DATB.

[37]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Contextual dynamics during health information systems implementation: an event-based actor-network approach , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Attention Shaping and Software Risk - A Categorical Analysis of Four Classical Risk Management Approaches , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Robert Chia,et al.  On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Jacky Swan,et al.  There’s More to Information Systems Development than Structured Approaches: Information Requirements Analysis as a Socially Mediated Process , 2000, Requirements Engineering.

[42]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[43]  P. Asaro.  Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design , 2000 .

[44]  G. Ritzer.  Structuration Theory , 2007 .

[45]  W. Orlikowski.  The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[46]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Michael I. Barrett,et al.  Negotiating ICT development and use: The case of a telemedicine system in the healthcare region of Crete , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[48]  D. Knights,et al.  Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management , 1995 .

[49]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  From technical to socio-technical change: tackling the human and organizational aspects of systems development projects , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[51]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[52]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[53]  K. Mcgrath,et al.  The Golden Circle: a way of arguing and acting about technology in the London Ambulance Service , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Laurie Carina McLeod,et al.  Understanding IS development and acquisition: a process approach , 2008 .

[55]  Bongsug Chae,et al.  The surface of emergence in systems development: agency, institutions, and large-scale information systems , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[56]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[57]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[58]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A Framework for software risk management , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[60]  E. Garnsey.  Exploring a critical systems perspective , 1993 .

[61]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: a practice approach , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..