Challenges to cervical screening in a developing country: The case of Malaysia.

OBJECTIVES Many developing countries, including Malaysia, will need to continue relying on cervical screening because they will not be able to cover their entire female adolescent populations with HPV vaccination. The aim of this paper was to establish the extent of the health care, informational, financial and psychosocial barriers to cervical screening in Malaysia. METHODS A literature search was made for reports on implementation, perceptions and reception of cervical screening in Malaysia published between January 2000 and September 2008. RESULTS Despite offering Pap smears for free since 1995, only 47.3% of Malaysian women have been screened. Several factors may have contributed to this. No national call-recall system has been established. Women are informed about cervical screening primarily through mass media rather than being individually invited. Smears are free of charge if taken in public hospitals and clinics, but the waiting times are often long. The health care system is unequally dense, with rural states being underserved compared to their urban counterparts. If the screening coverage was to increase, a shortage of smear-readers would become increasingly apparent. CONCLUSIONS Improving screening coverage will remain an important strategy for combating cervical cancer in Malaysia. The focus should be on the policy-making context, improving awareness and the screening infrastructure, and making the service better accessible to women.

[1]  O NorHayati,et al.  Cancer of the Cervix – From Bleak Past to Bright Future; a Review, with an Emphasis on Cancer of the Cervix in Malaysia , 2003 .

[2]  J. Kaur,et al.  Premarital sexual intercourse among adolescents in Malaysia: a cross-sectional Malaysian school survey. , 2006, Singapore medical journal.

[3]  A. Seow,et al.  Fatalism Reconceptualized: A Concept to Predict Health Screening Behavior , 1998 .

[4]  Stephen S Raab,et al.  Systems analysis of real-world obstacles to successful cervical cancer prevention in developing countries. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[5]  G. Jayaram,et al.  Cytopathology in Malaysia , 2002, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[6]  Jeannette Lee,et al.  Improving Adherence to Regular Pap Smear Screening among Asian Women: A Population-Based Study in Singapore , 2002, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[7]  K. Suwanrungruang,et al.  The coverage of cervical cancer screening in Khon Kaen, northeast Thailand. , 2003, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[8]  L. Looi,et al.  Carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a review of its pathology and commentary on the problem in Malaysians. , 1999, The Malaysian journal of pathology.

[9]  Clinical oncology in Malaysia: 1914 to present , 2006, Biomedical imaging and intervention journal.

[10]  E. Domingo,et al.  Epidemiology and prevention of cervical cancer in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. , 2008, Vaccine.

[11]  C. Ngelangel,et al.  Cancer and the Philippine Cancer Control Program. , 2002, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[12]  K. S. Beng,et al.  Cultural health beliefs in a rural family practice: a Malaysian perspective. , 2006, The Australian journal of rural health.

[13]  G. Lim,et al.  Overview of cancer in Malaysia. , 2002, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[14]  E. Khoo,et al.  Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer and screening among Malaysian women who have never had a Pap smear: a qualitative study. , 2009, Singapore medical journal.

[15]  M. Festin,et al.  Acetic‐acid guided visual inspection vs. cytology‐based screening for cervical cancer in the Philippines , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[16]  B. Chumworathayi,et al.  Why Thai women do not have cervical carcinoma screening test , 2007 .

[17]  Z. Obermeyer,et al.  Coverage of Cervical Cancer Screening in 57 Countries: Low Average Levels and Large Inequalities , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[18]  J. Bamford,et al.  An analysis of the costs of implementing the National Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in England , 2006, Journal of medical screening.

[19]  C. Boonpongmanee,et al.  Predictors of Papanicolaou Testing in Working Women in Bangkok, Thailand , 2007, Cancer nursing.

[20]  M. van Ballegooijen,et al.  Monitoring a national cancer prevention program: Successful changes in cervical cancer screening in the netherlands , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[21]  A. Seow,et al.  Beliefs and attitudes as determinants of cervical cancer screening: a community-based study in Singapore. , 1995, Preventive medicine.

[22]  L. Gaffikin,et al.  Safety, acceptability, and feasibility of a single-visit approach to cervical-cancer prevention in rural Thailand: a demonstration project , 2003, The Lancet.

[23]  Supriya Mukherjee,et al.  Women's perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India. , 2006, Cancer detection and prevention.