The Bikini Approach is Safe and Effective for Direct Anterior Approach THA

Abstract Conventional incision orientation for direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is longitudinal, paralleling fibers of the tensor fascia latae. Alternatively, a “bikini” incision can be oriented along Langer's lines. We sought to determine if there were any differences in surgical site complications (SSCs), mechanical complications, or reoperation between longitudinal and bikini DAA. We retrospectively reviewed 420 consecutive primary DAA THA by a single surgeon over a 2-year period. The surgeon was experienced with both incision orientations. Complications were recorded by chart review. Chi-square tests were used to examine for differences between categorical variables and t -tests for continuous variables. Longitudinal incisions were used in 320 patients (76.2%) while bikini incisions were used in 100 patients (23.8%). Women were significantly more likely to have a bikini incision (39.1% vs. 5.8%; p  < 0.00001). Across the entire cohort, patients undergoing THA through either longitudinal or bikini incision had comparable rates of SSCs (4.7% vs. 5.0%; p  = 0.90). With longitudinal incisions, SSCs were more likely to occur in obese patients compared with nonobese patients (8.3% vs. 3.1%; p  = 0.04). With bikini incisions, there was no difference in the rate of SSCs between obese and nonobese patients (4.0% vs. 5.3%; p  = 0.79). There were no differences in mechanical complications or rates of reoperation (0.3% vs. 0.0%; p  = 0.58). Both longitudinal and bikini incisions are safe and effective ways to perform the DAA for primary THA, with no differences in rates of SSCs, mechanical complications, or reoperation. For obese patients in this series, the bikini incision was associated with a lower rate of SSCs but requires future study due to dissimilar study groups.

[1]  P. Beaulé,et al.  The safety and efficacy of the anterior approach total hip arthroplasty as per body mass index. , 2022, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  José A. Rodriguez,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Incisional Negative Pressure following High-Risk Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Investigation performed in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY. , 2022, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  D. Dabirrahmani,et al.  Bikini anterior hip replacements in obese patients are not associated with an increased risk of complication , 2021, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[4]  Qiuru Wang,et al.  Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Traditional Longitudinal Incision and Bikini Incision in Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  W. Hozack,et al.  Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Bikini Incision Can Be Safely Performed in Obese Patients. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  J. Fritz,et al.  Short-term functional recovery after total joint arthroplasty is unaffected by bundled payment participation , 2018, Arthroplasty today.

[7]  H. Rüdiger,et al.  Skin crease ‘bikini’ incision for the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: A TWO‐ TO FOUR‐YEAR COMPARATIVE STUDY IN 964 PATIENTS , 2018, The bone & joint journal.

[8]  M. Alexiades,et al.  In-Hospital Morbidity and Postoperative Revisions After Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  F. Haddad,et al.  The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 2017, The bone & joint journal.

[10]  José A. Rodriguez,et al.  Risk Factors for Wound Complications After Direct Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  Tharun Karthikeyan,et al.  Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  W. Hozack,et al.  Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Indications, Technique, and Results , 2014, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[13]  A. Ranawat,et al.  Does the Direct Anterior Approach in THA Offer Faster Rehabilitation and Comparable Safety to the Posterior Approach? , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  W. P. Barrett,et al.  Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  M. Leunig,et al.  Skin Crease ‘Bikini’ Incision for Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique and Preliminary Results , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  U. Nöth,et al.  Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[17]  B. Jewett,et al.  High Complication Rate With Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasties on a Fracture Table , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  T. Lovell Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  Khaled Saleh,et al.  Predictors of wound infection in hip and knee joint replacement: results from a 20 year surveillance program , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  W. Harmsen,et al.  Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study. , 1998, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.