YouTube channels, uploads and views

To this date, it is difficult to find high-level statistics on YouTube that paint a fair picture of the platform in its entirety. This study attempts to provide an overall characterization of YouTube, based on a random sample of channel and video data, by showing how video provision and consumption evolved over the course of the past 10 years. It demonstrates stark contrasts between video genres in terms of channels, uploads and views, and that a vast majority of on average 85% of all views goes to a small minority of 3% of all channels. The analytical results give evidence that older channels have a significantly higher probability to garner a large viewership, but also show that there has always been a small chance for young channels to become successful quickly, depending on whether they choose their genre wisely.

[1]  Flavio Figueiredo,et al.  The tube over time: characterizing popularity growth of youtube videos , 2011, WSDM '11.

[2]  Mirjam Wattenhofer,et al.  YouTube around the world: geographic popularity of videos , 2012, WWW.

[3]  Yong-Yeol Ahn,et al.  Analyzing the Video Popularity Characteristics of Large-Scale User Generated Content Systems , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[4]  R. Lobato The cultural logic of digital intermediaries , 2016 .

[5]  Jin Kim,et al.  The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-generated content to professionally generated content , 2012 .

[6]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Dustin J. Welbourne,et al.  Science communication on YouTube: Factors that affect channel and video popularity , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[8]  S. R,et al.  Data Mining with Big Data , 2017, 2017 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO).

[9]  Niklas Carlsson,et al.  The untold story of the clones: content-agnostic factors that impact YouTube video popularity , 2012, KDD.

[10]  Zhi-Li Zhang,et al.  Counting YouTube videos via random prefix sampling , 2011, IMC '11.

[11]  Jiangchuan Liu,et al.  Statistics and Social Network of YouTube Videos , 2008, 2008 16th Interntional Workshop on Quality of Service.

[12]  Patrick Vonderau The video bubble , 2016 .

[13]  Joshua Green,et al.  The entrepreneurial vlogger: Participatory culture beyond the professional/amateur divide , 2009 .

[14]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Music on YouTube: User engagement with traditional, user-appropriated and derivative videos , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Stuart D. Cunningham,et al.  YouTube, multichannel networks and the accelerated evolution of the new screen ecology , 2016 .

[16]  Jussara M. Almeida,et al.  Using early view patterns to predict the popularity of youtube videos , 2013, WSDM.

[17]  Niklas Carlsson,et al.  Characterizing and modelling popularity of user-generated videos , 2011, Perform. Evaluation.

[18]  Jiangchuan Liu,et al.  Understanding the Characteristics of Internet Short Video Sharing: A YouTube-Based Measurement Study , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[19]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Predicting the popularity of online content , 2008, Commun. ACM.

[20]  Xianhui Che,et al.  A Survey of Current YouTube Video Characteristics , 2015, IEEE MultiMedia.

[21]  Frank Nack,et al.  Broadcast yourself on YouTube: really? , 2008, HCC '08.