A Uniform Technique for Flood Frequency Analysis

In 1967 the U.S. Water Resources Council (WRC) published Bulletin 15 recommending that a uniform technique be used by all Federal agencies in estimating floodflow frequencies for gaged watersheds. This uniform technique consisted of fitting the logarithms of annual peak discharges to a Pearson Type III distribution using the method of moments. The objective was to adopt a consistent approach for the estimation of floodflow frequencies that could be used in computing average annual flood losses for project evaluation. In addition, a consistent approach was needed for defining equitable flood‐hazard zones as part of the National Flood Insurance Program. In 1976 WRC published Bulletin 17 which extended and updated Bulletin 15 but still recommended the use of the “log‐Pearson Type III” method. Since 1976, two updates of Bulletin 17 (17A and 17B) have been published which clarify or improve on this base method, or do both. This paper gives a brief historical review of the development of these bulletins and the...

[1]  Gary D. Tasker,et al.  Flood frequency analysis with a generalized skew coefficient , 1978 .

[2]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  Confidence Intervals for Design Events , 1983 .

[3]  F. E. Grubbs,et al.  Extension of Sample Sizes and Percentage Points for Significance Tests of Outlying Observations , 1972 .

[4]  M. Leese,et al.  Use of censored data in the estimation of Gumbel distribution parameters for annual maximum flood series , 1973 .

[5]  Samuel O. Russell.  Flood Probability Estimation , 1982 .

[6]  Donthamsetti Veerabhadra Rao.  Log Pearson Type 3 Distribution: Method of Mixed Moments , 1980 .

[7]  R. Condie,et al.  The log Pearson type 3 distribution: The T-year event and its asymptotic standard error by maximum likelihood theory , 1977 .

[8]  G. Kuczera.  Robust Flood Frequency Models , 1982 .

[9]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[10]  N. C. Matalas,et al.  Some comparisons of flood statistics in real and log space , 1978 .

[11]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  Design events with specified flood risk , 1983 .

[12]  J. C. Houghton.  Birth of a parent: The Wakeby Distribution for modeling flood flows , 1978 .

[13]  Leo R. Beard,et al.  Probability estimates based on small normal‐distribution samples , 1960 .

[14]  Robert M. Hirsch,et al.  Investigation of trends in flooding in the Tug Fork basin of Kentucky, Virginia, and West Virginia , 1982 .

[15]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Estimation of parameters and quantiles of Wakeby Distributions: 1. Known lower bounds , 1979 .

[16]  C. H. Hardison,et al.  Generalized skew coefficients of annual floods in the United States and their application , 1974 .

[17]  Robert Condie,et al.  Flood frequency analysis with historic information , 1982 .

[18]  N. C. Matalas,et al.  Eureka! It fits a Pearson type: 3 distribution , 1973 .

[19]  John E. Costa,et al.  Holocene stratigraphy in flood frequency analysis , 1978 .

[20]  George Kuczera,et al.  A Bayesian surrogate for regional skew in flood frequency analysis , 1983 .

[21]  M. E. Jennings,et al.  Frequency Curves for Annual Flood Series with Some Zero Events or Incomplete Data , 1969 .

[22]  Larry W. Mays,et al.  REDUCING HYDROLOGIC PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY , 1981 .

[23]  M. A. Benson,et al.  Uniform Flood-Frequency Estimating Methods for Federal Agencies , 1968 .

[24]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Probability Weighted Moments: Definition and Relation to Parameters of Several Distributions Expressable in Inverse Form , 1979 .