Rank-related partner choice in the fission–fusion society of the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta)

When social partners vary in their relative value, individuals should theoretically initiate partnerships with conspecifics of the highest value. Here, we tested this prediction in a wild population of spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). Crocuta live in complex, fission–fusion societies structured by dominance hierarchies in which individuals vary greatly in their value as social companions. Because patterns of association among Crocuta reflect social preferences, we calculated association indices (AIs) to examine how social rank influences intrasexual partner choice among unrelated adults of both sexes. The highest-ranking individuals were generally most gregarious in both sexes. Females associated most often with dominant and adjacent-ranking females. Females joined subgroups based on the presence of particular conspecifics such that subordinates joined focal females at higher rates than did dominants. Dominants benefit from associations with subordinates by enjoying priority of access to resources obtained and defended by multiple group members, but the benefits of these associations to subordinates are unknown. To investigate this, we tested three hypotheses suggesting how subordinates might benefit from rank-related partner choice among unrelated females. We found that subordinates who initiated group formation benefited by gaining social and feeding tolerance from dominants. However, rates at which dominants provided coalitionary support to subordinates did not vary with AIs. Overall, our data resemble those documenting patterns of association among cercopithecine primates. We consider our results in light of optimal reproductive skew theory, Seyfarth’s rank attractiveness model, and biological market theory. Our data are more consistent with the predictions of Seyfarth’s model and of biological market theory than with those of skew theory.

[1]  Steven J. Schwager,et al.  A comparison of association indices , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  K. Holekamp,et al.  INDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN SPACE USE BY FEMALE SPOTTED HYENAS , 2003 .

[3]  P. Villiers,et al.  Home range, association and related aspects of elephants in the eastern Transvaal Lowveld , 1997 .

[4]  L. Frank,et al.  Social organization of the spotted hyaena Crocuta crocuta. II. Dominance and reproduction , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Kin discrimination in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta): nepotism among siblings , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  Paul A. Garber,et al.  On the move : how and why animals travel in groups , 2000 .

[7]  D. Gaynor,et al.  Effect of resource competition on the long-term allocation of grooming by female baboons: evaluating Seyfarth's model , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Sandra L. Vehrencamp,et al.  A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Sexually Dimorphic Dispersal in Mammals: Patterns, Causes, and Consequences , 1997 .

[10]  Hans Kruuk,et al.  The Spotted Hyena: A Study of Predation and Social Behavior , 1972 .

[11]  JULIA FISCHER,et al.  Use of statistical programs for nonparametric tests of small samples often leads to incorrectPvalues: examples fromAnimal Behaviour , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Association patterns among male and female spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) reflect male mate choice , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  I. Hamilton.  Recruiters and Joiners: Using Optimal Skew Theory to Predict Group Size and the Division of Resources within Groups of Social Foragers , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Game Theory and Animal Behavior , 2000 .

[15]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Competition and cooperation between litter-mates in the spotted hyaena, Crocuta crocuta , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  Disentangling association patterns in fission–fusion societies using African buffalo as an example , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  Kay E. Holekamp,et al.  Patterns of alliance formation and postconflict aggression indicate spotted hyaenas recognize third-party relationships , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  R. Wrangham.  An Ecological Model of Female-Bonded Primate Groups , 1980 .

[19]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Placental mammal diversification and the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Peter Arcese,et al.  Serengeti II : dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem , 1996 .

[21]  Peter L. Tyack,et al.  Animal social complexity : intelligence, culture, and individualized societies , 2003 .

[22]  M. Appleby.  Competition in a red deer stag social group: Rank, age and relatedness of opponents , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[24]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Faecal androgen concentrations in adult male spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta, reflect interactions with socially dominant females , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Truman P. Young,et al.  Ecological models of female social relationships in primates: similarities, disparities, and some directions for future clarity , 2002 .

[26]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Patterns of Association among Female Spotted Hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) , 1997 .

[27]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  Behavioral Ecology: Social Organization in Fission–Fusion Societies , 2006, Current Biology.

[28]  T. Clutton‐Brock.  Reproductive skew, concessions and limited control. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  Gabriele Schino,et al.  Grooming, competition and social rank among female primates: a meta-analysis , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  R. Noë,et al.  Economics in Nature: Biological markets: partner choice as the driving force behind the evolution of mutualisms , 2001 .

[31]  Kay E. Holekamp,et al.  Mechanisms of maternal rank ‘inheritance’ in the spotted hyaena, Crocuta crocuta , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Ontogeny of dominance in free-living spotted hyaenas: juvenile rank relations with adult females and immigrant males , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Reconciliation in the Spotted Hyena (Crocuta crocuta) , 2001 .

[34]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Social relationships and social cognition in nonhuman primates. , 1986, Science.

[35]  S. Glickman,et al.  Hormonal correlates of 'masculinization' in female spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta). 1. Infancy to sexual maturity. , 1992, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[36]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Rank and reproduction in the female spotted hyaena. , 1996, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[37]  S. Peter Henzi,et al.  Economics in Nature: The utility of grooming in baboon troops , 2001 .

[38]  H. Reeve.  A Transactional Theory of Within‐Group Conflict , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[39]  L. Barrett,et al.  Infants as a commodity in a baboon market , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  Joan B. Silk,et al.  On the Move. How and Why Animals Travel in Groups. , 2000 .

[42]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Ontogeny of dominance in free-living spotted hyaenas: juvenile rank relations with other immature individuals , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  Ronald Noë.  Cooperation experiments: coordination through communication versus acting apart together , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  L. Frank,et al.  The social complexity of spotted hyenas. , 2003 .

[45]  H. Hofer,et al.  The erect ‘penis’ is a flag of submission in a female-dominated society: greetings in Serengeti spotted hyenas , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[46]  Susan Perry,et al.  Time-matched grooming in female primates? New analyses from two species , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  S. Glickman,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta) , 1990 .

[48]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Behavioural structuring of relatedness in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) suggests direct fitness benefits of clan‐level cooperation , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[49]  P. Hammerstein,et al.  Biological markets. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  H. Hofer,et al.  Male spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) queue for status in social groups dominated by females , 2001 .

[51]  R. A. Hill,et al.  Market forces predict grooming reciprocity in female baboons , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  W. Murphy,et al.  Molecular evidence for major placental clades , 2005 .

[53]  Kay E. Holekamp,et al.  Group travel in social carnivores , 2000 .

[54]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  K. Holekamp,et al.  AGE ESTIMATION AND DISPERSAL IN THE SPOTTED HYENA (CROCUTA CROCUTA) , 2003 .

[56]  M. Mills.  Kalahari Hyaenas: Comparative Behavioural Ecology of Two Species , 1990 .

[57]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[58]  Susan M. Cooper,et al.  Optimal hunting group size: the need for lions to defend their kills against loss to spotted hyaenas , 1991 .

[59]  Kay E. Holekamp,et al.  Sex Differences in Territorial Behavior Exhibited by the Spotted Hyena (Hyaenidae, Crocuta crocuta) , 2001 .

[60]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes , 1992 .

[61]  P. Hammerstein,et al.  Economics in nature : social dilemmas, mate choice and biological markets , 2001 .

[62]  P. Hammerstein,et al.  Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[63]  Carel P. van Schaik,et al.  The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[64]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[65]  L. Keller,et al.  Reproductive sharing in animal societies: reproductive incentives or incomplete control by dominant breeders? , 1998 .

[66]  Kay E. Holekamp,et al.  Hunting rates and hunting success in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) , 1997 .

[67]  Jeanne Altmann,et al.  Social Bonds of Female Baboons Enhance Infant Survival , 2003, Science.