Reliable operation in a deregulated environment and under conditions of uncertainty requires that loads be considered adjustable. This paper assumes that participation in demand management programs is entirely voluntary, and the compensation for participation is an integral part of any demand management program. Another consideration is simplicity: demand management programs must be simple to understand, simple to use and reliable in their response. This paper considers and describes a variety of voluntary demand management programs, including full interruption, equipment specific partial interruptions, limits in use of current and/or power, and programs that guarantee a certain “relief performance”. It also considers a random mix of provider characteristics and demand characteristics. The paper illustrates that optimality (or nearoptimality) requires not one but a small portfolio of incentive programs. It further illustrates that regulatory incentives may be required to “line up” utility optimality with customer optimality.
[1]
Claudio A. Canizares,et al.
Point of collapse and continuation methods for large AC/DC systems
,
1993
.
[2]
Michael Beenstock,et al.
Generators and the cost of electricity outages
,
1991
.
[3]
Douglas W. Caves,et al.
The Cost of Electric Power Interruptions in the Industrial Sector: Estimates Derived from Interruptible Service Programs
,
1992
.
[4]
J. Herriges,et al.
Customer response to interruptible and curtailable rates: Volume 1, Methodology and results: Final report
,
1988
.
[5]
Fernando L. Alvarado,et al.
Sensitivity of the loading margin to voltage collapse with respect to arbitrary parameters
,
1997
.
[6]
F. Alvarado,et al.
Computation of closest bifurcations in power systems
,
1994
.