Use of computerized clinical support systems in medical settings: United States, 2001-03.

OBJECTIVES This report presents information on the use of electronic clinical systems to support patient care in physician offices and hospital emergency and outpatient settings. Percentages of hospital emergency and outpatient departments with electronic patient medical records and automated drug dispensing systems are presented by selected hospital characteristics for 2001-02. Percentages of physicians using electronic patient billing records, electronic patient medical records, and computerized prescription order entry systems are presented by selected physician characteristics for 2003. METHODS Data are from provider induction interviews from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), the ambulatory care component of the National Health Care Survey (NHCS). The NHCS is a family of provider-based surveys that collect information on the care provided in various medical care settings. RESULTS During 2001-03, electronic medical records were used less often in physician offices (17 percent) than in hospital emergency (31 percent) and outpatient departments (29 percent). In physician offices, information technology was more frequently used for billing patients (73 percent) than for maintaining medical records electronically (17 percent) or ordering prescriptions electronically (8 percent). Automated drug dispensing systems were available in hospital emergency departments (40 percent) more frequently than in outpatient departments (18 percent).

[1]  G J Kuperman,et al.  A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests. , 1999, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  David W. Bates,et al.  Position Paper: A Proposal for Electronic Medical Records in U.S. Primary Care , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  G. A. Loomis,et al.  If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them? , 2002, The Journal of family practice.

[4]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[5]  E. B. Steen,et al.  The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  L. McCaig,et al.  Plan and operation of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Survey. Series 1: programs and collection procedures. , 1994, Vital and health statistics. Ser. 1, Programs and collection procedures.

[7]  D. Cherry,et al.  National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 summary. , 2004, Advance data.

[8]  E A Balas,et al.  Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  D. Bates,et al.  Computerized physician order entry systems in hospitals: mandates and incentives. , 2002, Health affairs.

[10]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Federal health information policy: a case of arrested development. , 2003, Health affairs.

[11]  Dick Rs,et al.  The Computer-Based Patient Record: Revised Edition: An Essential Technology for Health Care , 1997 .

[12]  J. Feldman,et al.  Sample design, sampling variance, and estimation procedures for the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. , 1988, Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research.

[13]  B Barnwell,et al.  SUDAAN User's Manual, Release 7.5, , 1997 .

[14]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. , 1998, JAMA.

[16]  Michael Witt,et al.  SUDAAN User's Manual, Release 9.0 , 2002 .