A hierarchical stepwise approach to evaluate nasal patency after virtual surgery for nasal airway obstruction☆

Background: Despite advances in medicine and expenditures associated in treatment of nasal airway obstruction, 25–50% of patients undergoing nasal surgeries complain of persistent obstructive symptoms. Our objective is to develop a “stepwise virtual surgery” method that optimizes surgical outcomes for treatment of nasal airway obstruction. Methods: Pre‐surgery radiographic images of two subjects with nasal airway obstruction were imported into Mimics imaging software package for three‐dimension reconstruction of the airway. A hierarchical stepwise approach was used to create seven virtual surgery nasal models comprising individual (inferior turbinectomy or septoplasty) procedures and combined inferior turbinectomy and septoplasty procedures via digital modifications of each subject's pre‐surgery nasal model. To evaluate the effects of these procedures on nasal patency, computational fluid dynamics modeling was used to perform steady‐state laminar inspiratory airflow and heat transfer simulations in every model, at resting breathing. Airflow‐related variables were calculated for virtual surgery models and compared with dataset containing results of healthy subjects with no symptoms of nasal obstruction. Findings: For Subject 1, nasal models with virtual septoplasty only and virtual septoplasty plus inferior turbinectomy on less obstructed side were within the healthy reference thresholds on both sides of the nasal cavity and across all three computed variables. For Subject 2, virtual septoplasty plus inferior turbinectomy on less obstructed side model produced the best result. Interpretation: The hierarchical stepwise approach implemented in this preliminary report demonstrates computational fluid dynamics modeling ability to evaluate the efficiency of different surgical procedures for nasal obstruction in restoring nasal patency to normative level. HighlightsA “stepwise virtual surgery” method for treatment of nasal obstruction was developed.Virtual surgery approach identified patient‐specific optimal treatment options.Nasal virtual‐surgery brings computed measure of nasal patency to normative ranges.

[1]  S. Pawar,et al.  Computed nasal resistance compared with patient-reported symptoms in surgically treated nasal airway passages: A preliminary report. , 2012, American journal of rhinology & allergy.

[2]  David Wexler,et al.  Aerodynamic effects of inferior turbinate reduction: computational fluid dynamics simulation. , 2005, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[3]  Michael G. Stewart,et al.  Development and Validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale1 , 2004, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[4]  G. Garcia,et al.  Impact of Middle versus Inferior Total Turbinectomy on Nasal Aerodynamics , 2016, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[5]  E. Inada,et al.  Improvement of nasal airway ventilation after rapid maxillary expansion evaluated with computational fluid dynamics. , 2012, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  P. Dalton,et al.  Regional peak mucosal cooling predicts the perception of nasal patency , 2014, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  H. Lee,et al.  Assessment of septal deviation effects on nasal air flow: A computational fluid dynamics model , 2009, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  G. Garcia,et al.  Identifying patients who may benefit from inferior turbinate reduction using computer simulations , 2015, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  Cuneyt Sert,et al.  Numerical Study of the Aerodynamic Effects of Septoplasty and Partial Lateral Turbinectomy , 2008, The Laryngoscope.

[10]  Guilherme J M Garcia,et al.  Objective measures in aesthetic and functional nasal surgery: perspectives on nasal form and function. , 2010, Facial plastic surgery : FPS.

[11]  Petr Šidlof,et al.  Computational aeroacoustics of human phonation , 2013 .

[12]  Purushottam W. Laud,et al.  Changes in nasal airflow and heat transfer correlate with symptom improvement after surgery for nasal obstruction. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  H. Kunst,et al.  Sub-alar batten grafts as treatment for nasal valve incompetence; description of technique and functional evaluation. , 2006, Rhinology.

[14]  D. J. Taylor,et al.  Decomposition and Description of the Nasal Cavity Form , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Julia S Kimbell,et al.  Role of virtual surgery in preoperative planning: assessing the individual components of functional nasal airway surgery. , 2012, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[16]  Heow Pueh Lee,et al.  Inspirational airflow patterns in deviated noses: a numerical study , 2013, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[17]  Timothy L. Smith,et al.  Outcomes after Nasal Septoplasty: Results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) Study , 2004, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[18]  Yang Na,et al.  Patient specific CFD models of nasal airflow: overview of methods and challenges. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Jeffry D Schroeter,et al.  Influence of Mesh Density on Airflow and Particle Deposition in Sinonasal Airway Modeling. , 2016, Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery.

[20]  K. Graamans,et al.  Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence , 2009, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[21]  Guilherme J M Garcia,et al.  Atrophic rhinitis: a CFD study of air conditioning in the nasal cavity. , 2007, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  O Frank-ItoDennis,et al.  Influence of Mesh Density on Airflow and Particle Deposition in Sinonasal Airway Modeling , 2016 .

[23]  Guilherme J M Garcia,et al.  Perception of Better Nasal Patency Correlates with Increased Mucosal Cooling after Surgery for Nasal Obstruction , 2014, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[24]  E. Matida,et al.  Creation of a standardized geometry of the human nasal cavity. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  Jeffry D. Schroeter,et al.  Dosimetry of nasal uptake of water-soluble and reactive gases: A first study of interhuman variability , 2009, Inhalation toxicology.

[26]  A. Maloney,et al.  The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. , 1992, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[27]  Kevin J. Choi,et al.  Characterizing Airflow Profile in the Postoperative Maxillary Sinus by Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling: A Pilot Study , 2016, American journal of rhinology & allergy.

[28]  P. Clement,et al.  Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. , 2005, Rhinology.

[29]  Purushottam W. Laud,et al.  Predicting Postsurgery Nasal Physiology with Computational Modeling , 2014, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[30]  H P Lee,et al.  Aerodynamic effects of inferior turbinate surgery on nasal airflow--a computational fluid dynamics model. , 2010, Rhinology.

[31]  Seung-Kyu Chung,et al.  Effects of partial middle turbinectomy with varying resection volume and location on nasal functions and airflow characteristics by CFD , 2016, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[32]  Gerhard Rettinger,et al.  Numerical simulation of intranasal airflow after radical sinus surgery. , 2005, American journal of otolaryngology.

[33]  R. Chandra,et al.  Diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction. , 2009, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[34]  H. Dommerby,et al.  Long-term results of septoplastic operations. , 1985, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[35]  J. Kimbell,et al.  Septal deviation and nasal resistance: an investigation using virtual surgery and computational fluid dynamics. , 2010, American journal of rhinology & allergy.

[36]  Timothy L. Smith,et al.  Quality of Life Assessment in Nasal Airway Obstruction , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[37]  P. Illum.  Septoplasty and compensatory inferior turbinate hypertrophy: long-term results after randomized turbinoplasty , 2006, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[38]  G. Kenyon,et al.  Is there objective evidence that septal surgery improves nasal airflow? , 2006, The Journal of laryngology and otology.

[39]  C. Kimmelman.  The problem of nasal obstruction. , 1989, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[40]  Heow Pueh Lee,et al.  Numerical Simulation of the Effects of Inferior Turbinate Surgery on Nasal Airway Heating Capacity , 2010, American journal of rhinology & allergy.

[41]  P. Cole.  Nasal Airflow Resistance: A Survey of 2500 Assessments , 1997, American journal of rhinology.

[42]  Demin Han,et al.  Effects of septal deviation on the airflow characteristics: Using computational fluid dynamics models , 2012, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[43]  Peihua Wang,et al.  Investigation on the Structure of Nasal Cavity and Its Airflow Field in Crouzon Syndrome , 2011, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[44]  S. Plontke,et al.  Investigating the Nasal Cycle Using Endoscopy, Rhinoresistometry, and Acoustic Rhinometry , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[45]  Yingxi Liu,et al.  Aerodynamic investigation of the correlation between nasal septal deviation and Chronic rhinosinusitis , 2012, The Laryngoscope.

[46]  N. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Ambulatory sinus and nasal surgery in the United States: Demographics and perioperative outcomes , 2010, The Laryngoscope.

[47]  Guilherme J M Garcia,et al.  Toward personalized nasal surgery using computational fluid dynamics. , 2011, Archives of facial plastic surgery.