Inhibition of Return Generated by Voluntary Saccades is Independent of Attentional Momentum

Summoning attention to a peripheral location, either by a peripheral cue with the eyes fixed or when a voluntary saccade is made to it and gaze is then returned to the centre, delays detection of subsequent targets at that location compared to a location in the opposite visual field. It has been proposed that oculomotor activation generates this inhibition of return (IOR). This account presupposes that the asymmetry in detection results from inhibition at the cued location rather than facilitation at the uncued location. This has been confirmed for exogenously generated IOR. However, it has not, heretofore, been confirmed for “IOR” generated by voluntary saccades. The current study investigated whether the asymmetry in target detection, elicited either by a peripheral flash or by an eye movement generated in response to a central arrowhead, reflects facilitation at the opposite location due to the path of attentional momentum. Reaction times at the cued location were slower than reaction times at the opposite or perpendicular locations, which did not differ. Opposite facilitation due to attentional momentum requires that opposite be faster than perpendicular, which was not obtained. The results were the same whether IOR was generated by an exogenous cue or by a saccade executed endogenously to a central arrow.

[1]  R. Klein,et al.  Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  I. Hooge,et al.  Inhibition of saccade return (ISR): spatio-temporal properties of saccade programming , 2000, Vision Research.

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[4]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Jay Pratt,et al.  The Time to Detect Targets at Inhibited and Noninhibited Locations : Preliminary Evidence for Attentional Momentum , 2004 .

[6]  R. Klein,et al.  Contribution of the Primate Superior Colliculus to Inhibition of Return , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Robert D. Rafal,et al.  Inhibitory Tagging of Locations in the Blind Field of Hemianopic Patients , 1997, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  W C Schmidt,et al.  Attentional momentum does not underlie the inhibition of return effect. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  G. Tassinari,et al.  Ipsilateral inhibition and contralateral facilitation of simple reaction time to non-foveal visual targets from non-informative visual cues. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[10]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  J. Pratt,et al.  The Spatial Distribution of Inhibition of Return , 2001, Psychological science.

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[14]  J. Pratt,et al.  The spatial relationship between cues and targets mediates inhibition of return , 1998 .

[15]  R. Rafal,et al.  Effects of inhibition of return on voluntary and visually guided saccades. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.