Asymmetric priming effects in visual processing of occlusion patterns

In three experiments, we examined the effect of temporal context in amodal completion of partly occluded nontarget figures. In a primed same—different task, test pairs were preceded by a sequence of two primes, one of which was a single, the other a composite figure. Single figures reappeared in the composite ones, which also contained a square that could be viewed, alternatively, as an occluder or as yielding a mosaic fit to the other shape. To measure context influences between single and composite figures, both of which were nontargets, we studied their combined effect as primes on the test pairs of the same—different task, expecting that congruency between both primes should lead to a superadditive priming effect on the task. We found that single figures presented first provided facilitatory context for local and global occlusion as well as for mosaic interpretations of subsequently presented composite figures. These effects occurred only when the composite figure was presented briefly (50 msec). No superadditive facilitation occurred when composite figures were presented first and single figures followed them. The restriction of the effect to short presentations and its temporal asymmetry were taken as evidence that prior context biases possible occlusion interpretations during the process of completion, rather than afterward.

[1]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[2]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[3]  N Bruno,et al.  Amodal completion of partly occluded surfaces: is there a mosaic stage? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. , 1983 .

[5]  D. Mumford,et al.  Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioral experience and higher-order perceptual saliency , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Multiple Completions Primed by Occlusion Patterns , 1995, Perception.

[7]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[8]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Perceptual Organization of Local Elements into Global Shapes in the Human Visual Cortex , 2003, Current Biology.

[9]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis , 1985 .

[10]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Coding theory of visual pattern completion. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  Amodal Completion in Visual Search , 2004, Psychological science.

[12]  T. Albright,et al.  Contextual influences on visual processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  Thomas Lachmann,et al.  Negative and positive congruence effects in letters and shapes , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Competing global and local completions in visual occlusion. , 1995 .

[15]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Amodal representation depends on the object seen before partial occlusion , 1999, Vision Research.

[16]  H. K. Beller Priming: effects of advance information on matching. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  A. Michotte,et al.  Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptives , 1964 .

[18]  W Gerbino,et al.  The effect of a modal completion on visual matching. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[19]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Early completion of occluded objects , 1998, Vision Research.

[20]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Local and Global Processes in Visual Completion , 1994 .

[21]  Chie Nakatani,et al.  Amodal Completion as Reflected by Gaze Durations , 2004, Perception.

[22]  Walter Gerbino,et al.  Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? , 1982 .

[23]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  E Leeuwenberg,et al.  Knowledge within perception: masking caused by incompatible interpretation. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[25]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Masking unveils pre-amodal completion representation in visual search , 2001, Nature.

[26]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Global yet Early Processing of Visual Surfaces , 2003 .

[27]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. , 1992 .

[28]  R. Zemel,et al.  Experience-Dependent Perceptual Grouping and Object-Based Attention , 2002 .

[29]  A B Sekuler,et al.  The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  F. Restle,et al.  Analysis of ambiguity in visual pattern completion. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  C. Leeuwen,et al.  Context influence on the perception of figures as conditional upon perceptual organization strategies , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  C. van Leeuwen,et al.  Flexibility in spatial and non-spatial feature grouping: an event-related potentials study. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  P. Kellman,et al.  Boundary Completion in Illusory Contours: Interpolation or Extrapolation? , 2003, Perception.

[34]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Acts of perceptual inquiry: problems for any stimulus-based simplicity theory. , 2003, Acta psychologica.