Comparison of chemometric methods for the screening of comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatographic analysis of wine.

Two chemometric methods are compared for the rapid screening of comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatographic (LC×LC) analysis of wine. The similarity index and Fisher ratio methods were both found to be able to distinguish geographical variability and to determine potentially significant peaks for further quantitative and qualitative study. An experimental data set consisting of five different wine samples and multiple simulated data sets were analyzed in the investigation of the screening methods. Several statistical analyses are employed in the understanding and verification of the results from the similarity index and Fisher ratio methods. The sum rank difference (SRD) method was used to compare the rankings of the two different methods as applied to the different data sets and to determine the amount of variability associated with the ranking of the peak differences. The major advantage the similarity index method offers is that it is an unsupervised method; no a priori knowledge of the samples (i.e., class identification) is required, while the Fisher ratio method is supervised. Both methods are rapid and require little user intervention other than the determination of a threshold for inclusion/exclusion of compounds from further analysis.

[1]  S. Rutan,et al.  Chemometric Resolution and Quantification of Four-Way Data Arising from Comprehensive 2D-LC-DAD Analysis of Human Urine. , 2011, Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society.

[2]  Johanna Smeyers-Verbeke,et al.  Multivariate determination of the geographical origin of wines from four different countries , 2007 .

[3]  J. Câmara,et al.  Effectiveness of high-throughput miniaturized sorbent- and solid phase microextraction techniques combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis for a rapid screening of volatile and semi-volatile composition of wines--a comparative study. , 2012, Talanta.

[4]  I. Košir,et al.  Use of modern nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in wine analysis: determination of minor compounds , 2002 .

[5]  K. Héberger,et al.  Sum of ranking differences for method discrimination and its validation: comparison of ranks with random numbers , 2011 .

[6]  B. W. Wright,et al.  Fisher ratio method applied to third-order separation data to identify significant chemical components of metabolite extracts. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  M. Ortega-Heras,et al.  Comparative study of artificial neural network and multivariate methods to classify Spanish DO rose wines. , 2004, Talanta.

[8]  Lothar Willmitzer,et al.  Discrimination of wine attributes by metabolome analysis. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  Giselle Limentani,et al.  Beyond the t-test: statistical equivalence testing. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  Peter W Carr,et al.  Factors that affect quantification of diode array data in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography using chemometric data analysis. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  J. Braga,et al.  Determination of pesticides and metabolites in wine by high performance liquid chromatography and second-order calibration methods. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[12]  K. Héberger Sum of ranking differences compares methods or models fairly , 2010 .

[13]  S. Reichenbach,et al.  Smart templates for peak pattern matching with comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[14]  Stamatina Kallithraka,et al.  Differentiation of young red wines based on cultivar and geographical origin with application of chemometrics of principal polyphenolic constituents. , 2006, Talanta.

[15]  Willem Windig,et al.  The use of the Durbin-Watson criterion for noise and background reduction of complex liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry data and a new algorithm to determine sample differences , 2005 .

[16]  Ioannis S. Arvanitoyannis,et al.  Application of quality control methods for assessing wine authenticity : Use of multivariate analysis (chemometrics) , 1999 .

[17]  Dwight R Stoll,et al.  Fast, comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[18]  Neil Salkind,et al.  Encyclopedia of research design , 2010 .