Attention sharing during timing: Modulation by processing demands of an expected stimulus

Varying the location of a nontemporal task during a time estimation task affects temporal estimates. Previous studies have also shown that manipulating the location of a stimulus to ignore may disturb timing similarly, suggesting that the effect might be independent of the processing requirements in the nontemporal task. In Experiment 1, the location of a tone varied during a 2-sec interval production; participants were asked either to ignore the tone or to discriminate its frequency. Productions were longer when the tone was presented later, but only when it was processed. In Experiment 2, short and long tones corresponding to more or less difficult discrimination tasks were used. The location effect was stronger and remained stronger throughout the experiment when participants were tested with the short tone in the first experimental session than when they were tested with the long tone first. These results suggest that timing is influenced by relatively stable attention-sharing strategies.

[1]  B. Rakitin,et al.  The effects of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on choice time production accuracy and variability. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  D. Nitzan,et al.  The influence of task difficulty and external tempo on subjective time estimation , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  R. Block,et al.  The role of attention in time estimation processes , 1996 .

[4]  C Fortin,et al.  Expecting a break in time estimation: attentional time-sharing without concurrent processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Claudette Fortin,et al.  Attentional Time-Sharing in Interval Timing , 2003 .

[6]  S W Brown,et al.  The role of practice and automaticity in temporal and nontemporal dual-task performance , 2002, Psychological research.

[7]  Scott W. Brown.  Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Dan Zakay,et al.  Gating or switching? Gating is a better model of prospective timing (a response to ‘switching or gating?’ by Lejeune) 1 Originally published in Vol. 50, issue 1, pages 1–17; PII of the original publication: S0376-6357(00)00086-3. 1 , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[9]  Dan Zakay,et al.  Chapter 10 Subjective Time and Attentional Resource Allocation: An Integrated Model of Time Estimation , 1989 .

[10]  Robert Rousseau,et al.  An Adaptive Counter Model for Time Estimation , 1984 .

[11]  T. F. Sawyer,et al.  Contrasting task demands alter the perceived duration of brief time intervals , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  S. W. Brown,et al.  Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  F. Macar,et al.  Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[14]  M. Masson.  Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[15]  F. Macar,et al.  Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Louis Buffardi,et al.  Factors affecting the filled-duration illusion in the auditory, tactual, and visual modalities , 1971 .

[17]  Claudette Fortin,et al.  Timing during interruptions in timing. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Robert Rousseau,et al.  Interference from short-term memory processing on encoding and reproducing brief durations , 1998, Psychological research.

[19]  F. Macar.  Expectancy, controlled attention and automatic attention in prospective temporal judgments. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[20]  B Burle,et al.  Dissociation between activation and attention effects in time estimation: implications for internal clock models. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  F. Vidal,et al.  Functional Anatomy of the Attentional Modulation of Time Estimation , 2004, Science.

[22]  R M Church,et al.  Scalar Timing in Memory , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Sébastien Tremblay,et al.  Break expectancy in duration discrimination. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  R. E. Hicks,et al.  Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed. , 1976, The American journal of psychology.

[25]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  No evidence for qualitative differences in the processing of short and long temporal intervals. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[26]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Acquisition and Transfer of Skilled Performance: Are Visual Discrimination Skills Stimulus Specific? , 1996 .

[27]  C Fortin,et al.  Order information in short-term memory and time estimation , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[28]  J. Groeger,et al.  Temporal interval production and short-term memory , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.