Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.

This article investigates how people's metacognitive judgments influence subsequent study-time-allocation strategies. The authors present a comprehensive literature review indicating that people allocate more study time to judged-difficult than to judged-easy items--consistent with extant models of study-time allocation. However, typically, the materials were short, and participants had ample time for study. In contrast, in Experiment 1, when participants had insufficient time to study, they allocated more time to the judged-easy items than to the judged-difficult items, especially when expecting a test. In Experiment 2, when the materials were shorter, people allocated more study time to the judged-difficult materials. In Experiment 3, under high time pressure, people preferred studying judged-easy sonnets; under moderate time pressure, they showed no preference. These results provide new evidence against extant theories of study-time allocation.

[1]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  Judgments of knowing: The influence of retrieval practice. , 1980 .

[2]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[3]  Gregg T. Vesonder,et al.  Knowledge of one's own responding and the relation of such knowledge to learning: A developmental study☆ , 1978 .

[4]  D. Berlyne.  Curiosity and learning , 1978 .

[5]  Marcia K. Johnson.  Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach. , 1988 .

[6]  J. Jenkins,et al.  The effects of cued orienting tasks on the free recall of words , 1973 .

[7]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. , 1999 .

[8]  B. Underwood.  Individual and group predictions of item difficulty for free learning. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Effects of incentive-set on relevant and irrelevant (incidental) learning in children. , 1963, Child development.

[10]  L. Reder,et al.  What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer , 1992 .

[11]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[12]  T. S. Hyde,et al.  Recall for words as a function of semantic, graphic, and syntactic orienting tasks. , 1973 .

[13]  A. Koriat.  Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning , 1997 .

[14]  D. Kausler,et al.  Effects of Incentive-Set and Task Variables on Relevant and Irrelevant Learning in Serial Verbal Learning , 1962 .

[15]  Annette Dufresne,et al.  Children's spontaneous allocation of study time: Differential and sufficient aspects , 1989 .

[16]  C. Heriza.  Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition , 1979 .

[17]  Annette Dufresne,et al.  Developmental Differences in Children's Spontaneous Allocation of Study Time , 1988 .

[18]  George Kellas,et al.  Effect of response requirement and type of material on acquisition and retention performance in short-term memory , 1971 .

[19]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. , 1999, Psychological review.

[20]  Ralph E. Reynolds,et al.  Effect of Interest on Attention and Learning , 1988 .

[21]  T. S. Hyde,et al.  Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. , 1969 .

[22]  Lola L. Cuddy,et al.  Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation , 1969 .

[23]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  TOTimals : a controlled experimental method for studying tip-of-the-tongue states , 1991 .

[24]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Two More Incidental Tasks That Differentially Affect Associative Clustering in Recall. , 1971 .

[25]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  When People's Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are Extremely Accurate at Predicting Subsequent Recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect” , 1991 .

[26]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Training Programs to Improve Learning in Later Adulthood: Helping Older Adults Educate Themselves , 1998 .

[27]  L. Reder.  Strategy selection in question answering , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  John H. Flavell,et al.  Developmental changes in apportionment of study time among items in a multitrial free recall task , 1973 .

[29]  J Metcalfe.  Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: implications for Korsakoff amnesia. , 1993, Psychological review.

[30]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The role of metacognitive processes in the regulation of memory performance. , 1998 .

[31]  William L. Cull,et al.  The learning ability paradox in adult metamemory research: Where are the metamemory differences between good and poor learners? , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[32]  L. Groninger.  Predicting Recall: The "Feeling-That-I-Will-Know" Phenomenon , 1979 .

[33]  S. M. Smith,et al.  Feeling-of-knowing judgments from the subject's perspective. , 1996, The American journal of psychology.

[34]  Steven R. Asher,et al.  Influence of Topic Interest on Children's Reading Comprehensiona , 1978 .

[35]  A Koriat,et al.  Phonetic symbolism and feeling of knowing , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[36]  T. O. Nelson.  Predictive accuracy of the feeling of knowing across different criterion tasks and across different subject populations and individuals. , 1988 .

[37]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The Effects of Test Expectancy on Processing and Memory of Prose. , 1994 .

[38]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory? , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Delaying students' metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance. , 1994 .

[40]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Overlearning and the Feeling of Knowing , 1982 .

[41]  L. Postman.  Short-Term Memory and Incidental Learning , 1964 .

[42]  A. Koriat.  How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. , 1993 .

[43]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Older and younger adults use a functionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multitrial learning. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[44]  J. Flavell.  Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[45]  Gregg T. Vesonder,et al.  On the ability to predict one's own responses while learning , 1985 .

[46]  T. Vecchi,et al.  Remembering the Grocery Shopping List: a Study on Metacognitive Biases , 1997 .

[47]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  The effects of demand characteristics on the reporting of tip-of-the-tongue and feeling-of-knowing states , 1996 .

[48]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of three predictors of an individual's memory performance: the individual's feeling of knowing versus the normative feeling of knowing versus base-rate item difficulty. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  How Shall We Explain the Delayed-Judgment-Of-Learning Effect? , 1992 .

[50]  R. Atkinson.  Optimizing the Learning of a Second-Language Vocabulary. , 1972 .

[51]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[52]  Bennett L. Schwartz,et al.  Methodological problems and pitfalls in the study of human metacognition. , 1994 .

[53]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Why investigate metacognition , 1994 .

[54]  F. Craik,et al.  The role of rehearsal in short-term memory , 1973 .

[55]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Does the Sensitivity of Judgments of Learning (JOLs) to the Effects of Various Study Activities Depend on When the JOLs Occur , 1994 .

[56]  Steven R. Asher,et al.  Influence of Topic Interest on Black Children's and White Children's Reading Comprehension. , 1979 .

[57]  J. Metcalfe.  Premonitions of insight predict impending error. , 1986 .

[58]  Similarity between the Cue for Judgments of Learning (JOL) and the Cue for Test Is Not the Primary Determinant of JOL Accuracy , 1997 .

[59]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[61]  C. Dweck,et al.  A goal analysis of personality and personality coherence. , 1999 .

[62]  J. Metcalfe.  Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. , 1986 .

[63]  Richard C. Anderson.  Allocation of Attention during Reading. , 1982 .

[64]  J. Ebeling,et al.  Monitoring and control , 1994 .

[65]  John M. Gardiner,et al.  Memory for remembered events: An assessment of output monitoring in free recall , 1976 .

[66]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective? , 1993 .

[67]  T. S. Hyde.  Differential effects of effort and type of orienting task on recall and organization of highly associated words. , 1973 .

[68]  A. Kobasigawa,et al.  Spontaneous Allocation of Study Time by First- and Third-Grade Children in a Simple Memory Task , 1993 .

[69]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Dissociating Knowing and the Feeling of Knowing : Further Evidence for the Accessibility Model , 2005 .

[70]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[71]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[72]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Goal Effects on Action and Cognition , 1996 .

[73]  Michael A. Becker.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[74]  M. Gruneberg,et al.  ‘Feeling of knowing’ and cued recall ☆ , 1974 .

[75]  E. Lovelace.  Metamemory: Monitoring Future Recallability During Study , 1984 .

[76]  I. Erev,et al.  LEARNING STRATEGIES , 2010 .

[77]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[78]  Ann L. Brown.  Knowing When, Where, and How to Remember: A Problem of Metacognition. Technical Report No. 47. , 1977 .

[79]  G Mazzoni,et al.  Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation? , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[80]  J. Metcalfe.  Metamemory: Theory and data. , 2000 .

[81]  James J. Jenkins,et al.  Effects of orienting tasks on free recall in incidental learning: “difficulty,” “effort,” and “process” explanations , 1973 .

[82]  R. Zacks.  Invariance of total learning time under different conditions of practice. , 1969 .

[83]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy , 1996 .

[84]  Steven R. Asher,et al.  Sex Differences in Comprehension of High-and Low-Interest Reading Material. , 1974 .

[85]  C. Dweck.  Capturing the Dynamic Nature of Personality , 1996 .

[86]  K. Thiede.  The Relative Importance of Anticipated Test Format and Anticipated Test Difficulty on Performance , 1996 .

[87]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[88]  J. Hart,et al.  Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.

[89]  Guy Denhière,et al.  Regulation of study-time and interstimulus similarity in self-paced learning conditions , 1972 .

[90]  T. O. Nelson.  Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[91]  S. Wolk.  The influence of meaningfulness upon intentional and incidental learning of verbal material , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[92]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  The Retrieval of Related Information Influences Tip-of-the-Tongue States , 1997 .

[93]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. , 1971 .

[94]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study During Multitrial Learning , 1994 .