Glare susceptibility test results correlate with temporal safety margin when executing turns across approaching vehicles in simulated low‐sun conditions

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of a laboratory glare susceptibility test with the execution of turns at an intersection (turns that required the driver to cross a lane containing approaching traffic). We measured glare susceptibility by means of low and high‐contrast letter charts with and without a glare source. Driving performance in the absence and presence of simulated low sun was assessed using a simulator. In particular, we measured the difference between the time taken to complete a turn across the path of an approaching vehicle and the time to collision (TTC) with the approaching vehicle (the safety margin). The presence of glare resulted in a significant reduction in the safety margin used by drivers (by 0.65 s on average) and the mean number of collisions was significantly higher in the glare conditions than in the non‐glare conditions. The effect of glare was larger for low‐contrast than for high‐contrast oncoming vehicles. Older drivers (45–60 years) had a significantly greater reduction in safety margin than younger drivers (19–29 years), though there was a large inter‐individual variability in both age groups. We suggest that the reduction in retinal image contrast caused by low‐sun caused drivers to overestimate the TTC with approaching vehicles.

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[3]  J. J. Vos.  On the cause of disability glare and its dependence on glare angle, age and ocular pigmentation , 2003, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[4]  L. Paulsson,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in the presence of a glare light. Theoretical concepts and preliminary clinical studies. , 1980, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  K. Ball,et al.  A Preliminary Assessment of the Medical and Functional Factors Associated with Vehicle Crashes by Older Adults , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[6]  Michael Perel,et al.  Relation Between Glare and Driving Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[7]  M. Babizhayev.  Glare Disability and Driving Safety , 2003, Ophthalmic Research.

[8]  D. A. Owens,et al.  Standard Measures of Visual Acuity Do Not Predict Drivers’ Recognition Performance Under Day or Night Conditions , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  A. Hart,et al.  PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT , 2007 .

[10]  D. Regan,et al.  Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: Different neural mechanisms? , 1979, Vision Research.

[11]  J. J. Vos,et al.  Light profiles of the foveal image of a point source , 1976, Vision Research.

[12]  Rob Gray,et al.  Perceptual Processes Used by Drivers During Overtaking in a Driving Simulator , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[13]  T. J. T. P. Van Den Berg,et al.  Importance of pathological intraocular light scatter for visual disability , 1986, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[14]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[15]  Christopher Nowakowski.  A Preliminary Evaluation of a Driver-Infrastructure Interface for a Left-Turn Warning , 2006 .

[16]  C. Sánchez-Ramos,et al.  Mesopic contrast sensitivity in the presence or absence of glare in a large driver population , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[17]  T. J. T. P. van den Berg,et al.  The intraocular straylight function in 129 healthy volunteers; Dependence on angle, age and pigmentation , 1990, Vision Research.

[18]  Myron L. Wolbarsht.  Tests for glare sensitivity and peripheral vision in driver applicants. , 1977 .

[19]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion , 1993, Vision Research.

[20]  D Regan,et al.  Risky driving behavior: a consequence of motion adaptation for visually guided motor action. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  D Regan,et al.  Adapting to expansion increases perceived time-to-collision , 1999, Vision Research.

[22]  Lotte Larsen,et al.  Multidisciplinary in-depth investigations of head-on and left-turn road collisions. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  M. Marmor,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and glare testing in the evaluation of anterior segment disease , 1990 .

[24]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[25]  J. J. Vos,et al.  Ocular scattered light and visual performance as a function of age. , 1967, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[26]  M. Bullimore,et al.  A New Test for the Evaluation of Disability Glare , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  George B. Benedek,et al.  Intraocular light Scattering , 1973 .

[29]  K. Ball,et al.  Exploratory study of incident vehicle crashes among older drivers. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[30]  Fred Sir Hoyle,et al.  The Black Cloud , 1957 .

[31]  Robert Gray,et al.  Risky driving behavior: a consequence of motion adaptation for visually guided motor action. , 2000 .

[32]  D. Regan,et al.  Cyclopean motion perception produced by Oscillations of size, disparity and location , 1996, Vision Research.

[33]  D. Regan,et al.  Measurement of glare sensitivity in cataract patients using low‐contrast letter charts * , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[34]  D. Regan,et al.  Estimating the time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object , 2000, Vision Research.

[35]  J. Holladay,et al.  Brightness acuity test and outdoor visual acuity in cataract patients , 1987, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[36]  D Regan,et al.  Visually guided locomotion: psychophysical evidence for a neural mechanism sensitive to flow patterns. , 1979, Science.

[37]  The Charles F. Prentice Award Lecture 1990: specific tests and specific blindnesses: keys, locks, and parallel processing. , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[38]  Beth T. Stalvey,et al.  Visual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[39]  J. Wood,et al.  Predicting Components of Closed Road Driving Performance From Vision Tests , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[40]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Confirmation of the validity of the psychophysical light scattering factor. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[41]  David W. Miller,et al.  Glare and Contrast Sensitivity for Clinicians , 1990, Springer New York.

[42]  D. Regan,et al.  Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage , 1979, Vision Research.